The Crime of Incitement to Suicide and Its Penalty (TCK 84)

---

What is Incitement to Suicide (TCK 84)?

Incitement to suicide, is a type of crime that occurs when one person influences another in a manner that drives them to commit suicide or facilitates the occurrence of suicide. In the Turkish Penal Code, TCK 84 is governed by.

The primary purpose of this offense is to protect the right to life of individuals. The legislature stipulates that even if a person's suicide is their own "act"; intentional and effective interventions by third parties are subject to separate penalties.

An important distinction: In practice and ECtHR judgments (regarding Turkish cases), parallel to the approach of the Court of Cassation, "simple provocation/incitement" is often not deemed sufficient for Article 84 of the TCK. The evaluation is made based on the specific circumstances of the case; the intent of the perpetrator and whether the act seriously facilitates the suicide play a critical role.

---

What is Incitement to Suicide?

Incitement to suicide, in an individual whose thought or decision to commit suicide is not yet clear, the decision to commit suicide in a manner that will cause the formation of to make suggestions and direct.

• In "instigation", the perpetrator is generally the person who initiates or distinctly gives rise to the victim's idea of suicide person.
• The scope of the act may materialize through behaviors such as messaging, conversations, directing, and having a plan made.

In practice, when evaluating instigation, the following questions generally come to the forefront:

• Did the victim already have the decision to commit suicide beforehand?
• Were the perpetrator's words and actions decisive in the formation of the decision?
• Did the perpetrator have the requisite intent (intentional guidance)?

---

What is Incitement to Suicide of Another?

Incitement to suicide, encouraging a person to commit suicide encouraging/inciting can be evaluated as increasing through behaviors; attempting to portray suicide as a "solution".

Encouragement may appear more "general" in certain incidents compared to instigation; however, the key point regarding criminal liability remains as follows:

• Is the speech or behavior effective in the process leading to suicidal behavior in the specific incident?
• Did the perpetrator intentionally do this?

According to the approach adopted in ECtHR jurisprudence, behaviors qualifying as "simple provocation," such as harsh words uttered merely during an argument, may not always meet the standard of TCK Article 84; intent with the purpose of significantly facilitating the suicidal act of function is required.

---

What is Reinforcing the Decision to Commit Suicide?

Article 84 of the TCK also includes "reinforcing another person's decision to commit suicide" as an alternative act. This occurs when the victim has already decided to commit suicide, and the perpetrator reinforces this decision through pressure or persuasion processes such as:

• "Do it, it would be for the best"
• "You have no other choice anyway"
• "If you don't do it..." stronger, more definitive making it so.

In this case, it is not a matter of instigating (azmettirme) the formation of a decision; rather, it is a matter of reinforcing the existing decision.

---

What is Aiding Another's Suicide?

One of the most critical areas within the scope of TCK Article 84 is "aiding suicide". Aiding can be any behavior that materially facilitates the occurrence of the suicide.

Sample categories (may vary depending on the specific case):

• Providing the instrument to be used (medication, weapon, etc.)
• Preparing the location/environment
• Explaining the method of suicide and directing
• Facilitating the execution by assisting during the act

As emphasized in the ECtHR jurisprudence, in the evaluation of "aid" and "incitement", the perpetrator's financial facilitation and intent its elements are important.

---

Penalty for the Crime of Incitement to Suicide (TCK Article 84 Penalty)

TCK 84 determines the sentencing range based on the consequences of the act and the manner of its commission:

• TCK 84/1: Instigation, encouragement, reinforcing the decision, or assistance
  → Imprisonment from 2 to 5 years
• TCK 84/2: If the suicide takes place
  → imprisonment from 4 to 10 years
• TCK 84/3: to encourage others to commit suicide publicly incitement
  → Imprisonment from 3 to 8 years

Here, "publicly" may refer to situations where the act is committed in a manner accessible to an indefinite number of persons (e.g., crowded environments, internet broadcasts, publicly accessible shares). Whether the specific incident meets the "publicity" requirement is evaluated separately.

---

What is the Crime of Publicly Inciting Suicide (TCK Art. 84/3)?

Publicly inciting suicideencompasses making statements that encourage suicide directed at society or an indefinite number of persons, rather than a specific individual.

This heading may particularly arise in mediums such as:

• Social media content
• Video broadcasts
• Forum posts
• Guidance in publicly accessible groups

Additionally, there may be another distinct legal risk in the field of content production/communication: Regarding publications that constitute "encouraging suicide" in terms of press law Press Law Art. 20 sanctions may also come to the agenda (this constitutes a framework separate from TCK 84).

---

Compelling Suicide Through Coercion or Threat: Liability for Intentional Killing (TCK 84/4)

TCK 84/4 introduces a very crucial threshold: In certain cases, the act is no longer deemed "inciting suicide," but directly intentional homicide may be evaluated within the scope of.

The Article specifically enumerates two main situations:

1. Inciting individuals whose cognitive capacity is undeveloped or impaired to commit suicide
2. Compelling a person to commit suicide by using coercion or threats

In this case, the law explicitly states: “shall be held liable for the offense of intentional homicide”. In other words, criminal liability may escalate to a much more severe level.

---

Intent (Mens Rea) and Evidence in the Offense of Incitement to Suicide

TCK 84 bakımından uygulamadaki en kritik tartışma alanları şunlardır:

1) Proof of Intent

Failin, mağdurun intiharına yönelik süreci knowingly and intentionally whether it had an impact can be assessed through message contents, witness testimonies, prior incidents, and expert evaluations.

As also emphasized in ECHR jurisprudence, mere phenomena such as “offensive language, quarrels, or hurtful expressions” do not automatically lead to the application of Article 84 of the TCK in every case; intent and material facilitation criteria such as these are crucial.

2) Causation (The Link Between the Act and the Result)

In the event of suicide, the following questions specifically arise:

• What is the extent of the perpetrator's influence on the formation of the decision to commit suicide?
• Is there a strong causal link between the suicide act and the perpetrator's act?
• Are there the victim's independent free will, other contributing causes, or psychiatric processes?

This assessment is always dependent on the specific circumstances of the case.

---

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

• What is the crime of instigating or aiding suicide (TCK Art. 84)?

According to TCK Art. 84, the crime of instigating or aiding suicide is committed through the acts of instigating a person to commit suicide,, the restoration of the victim's liberty, is a more severe judicial measure that results in reinforcing their decision to commit suicide, or assisting their suicide in any way. The law increases the penalty depending on whether the suicide is actually carried out or not.

• What is the prison sentence under TCK Art. 84?

The penalty ranges under TCK Article 84 are briefly as follows:- TCK 84/1: Imprisonment from 2 to 5 years

• TCK 84/2 (if suicide occurs): imprisonment from 4 to 10 years
• TCK 84/3 (public incitement): Imprisonment from 3 to 8 years

The penalty amount is determined based on the specific circumstances of the case (intent, evidentiary status, severity of the act, publicity, etc.).

• Is saying "commit suicide" a crime?

Whether a single sentence constitutes a crime on its own depends on the specific circumstances of the case . What is critical in practice is whether this statement intentionally in a manner that seriously affects the victim's suicide process and the suicide to a significant extent facilitating whether it bears the character of. In ECtHR jurisprudence, with reference to the case law of the Court of Cassation, “simple provocation/incitement” approach is observed, indicating that it may not always be sufficient.

• What is the difference between encouraging suicide and instigating suicide?

In general terms:- Instigation: Planting the idea/decision of suicide in the victim to constitute directing in such a manner.- Incentive: An existing trend reinforcement/encouragement, attempting to portray suicide as an “exit.” Both may fall within the scope of TCK 84; the distinction arises from when and how the victim's decision was formed and the degree of the perpetrator's influence.

• What does “reinforcing the decision to commit suicide” mean?

It refers to the perpetrator making the victim's pre-existing suicide ideation/decision more definitive and stronger through their words and actions. For example, effects such as pushing the person to the point of “I must do it” and eliminating the possibility of hesitation may be evaluated in the specific case.

• Which behaviors are covered by aiding suicide (TCK 84)?

The concept of “aid” is broad and may encompass behaviors materially facilitates facilitating suicide. Examples include (depending on the case): - Providing the instrument to be used in the suicide

• Providing guidance on the method/location/plan
• Providing an environment or immediate support in a way that facilitates the act

Here too, intent and must be a causal nexus (the effect of the assistance on the suicide) is important.

• Is a penalty still imposed if the suicide does not take place?

Yes. TCK Article 84/1 does not make the occurrence of suicide a condition. Even if the suicide has not taken place, acts of instigation/encouragement/reinforcement/assistance if proven, the imposition of a penalty may come into question.

• What is publicly inciting suicide (TCK Art. 84/3)?

"Public incitement" refers to encouraging suicide directed at an indefinite number of persons (e.g., publicly accessible posts, open communities, public settings) in an encouraging manner. Here, the target does not have to be a single person; what matters is that the act is publicly accessible nature and incentive content.

• Is it a crime to post content on social media that praises or encourages suicide?

An assessment may be made within the scope of Article 84/3 of the TCK, taking into account the content, language, context, target audience, and the condition of "openness." In particular, content that "depicts suicide as a solution" and is capable of encouraging it carries legal risks. The assessment in each case is specific to the circumstances; the limits of freedom of expression and the element of intent are also debated.

• Can an access block be imposed on content promoting suicide on the internet?

Regarding content on the internet that falls within the scope of Article 84 of the TCK, blocking of access there are regulations indicating that the process may come into question. In secondary legislation concerning internet broadcasts, among the crimes that may be the subject of an access blocking decision, TCK 84 (Incitement to suicide) is also enumerated.

Applicable Legal Steps (For Relatives of Victims / Persons Who May File a Complaint)

1. Preserve the evidence: Messages, emails, social media screenshots, links, witness contact information.
2. Prepare a criminal complaint for the Prosecutor's Office: The sequence of events must be explained chronologically and with concrete evidence.
3. Access logs / platform data: If necessary, it may be requested that the prosecutor's office issue writs to the relevant platforms.
4. Expert examinations: Issues such as the psychiatric process, the vulnerability of the victim, and the impact of the events may require expert evaluation.
5. Legal qualification debate: Will the incident constitute an offense under TCK Article 84, or will it evolve into premeditated murder due to TCK Article 84/4? This distinction directly affects the strategy.

---

Conclusion / Summary

• TCK 84 (Incitement to suicide); driving a person to suicide instigation, incitement, reinforcing the decision or aiding suicide punishes these acts.- Penal range: – Basic form: 2–5 years of imprisonment (TCK 84/1)
• If suicide occurs: 4 to 10 years imprisonment (TCK 84/2)
• Public incitement: 3 to 8 years imprisonment (TCK 84/3)
• Compelling someone to commit suicide by force or threats or inducing a person lacking the capacity of perception to commit suicide in the event of such acts, the perpetrator for intentional homicide may be held liable (TCK 84/4).- In ECHR jurisprudence, referencing the approach of the Court of Cassation, simple provocation is not always deemed sufficient; criteria such as the perpetrator intentionally and significantly facilitating the suicide come to the forefront.

For more information https://batinyilmaz.av.tr/iletisim/ via our contact address and 0532 669 34 90 you can reach us at our phone number.

Atty. Batın YILMAZ