{"id":3819,"date":"2026-10-20T23:21:48","date_gmt":"2026-10-20T20:21:48","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/?p=3819"},"modified":"2026-10-20T23:21:51","modified_gmt":"2026-10-20T20:21:51","slug":"g-87-tahdit-kodu-iptal-mahkeme-karari","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/g-87-tahdit-kodu-iptal-mahkeme-karari\/","title":{"rendered":"Annulment of G-87 Restriction Code Extended for 15 Years: Ankara 26th Administrative Court Ruling"},"content":{"rendered":"<div id=\"ez-toc-container\" class=\"ez-toc-v2_0_88 counter-hierarchy ez-toc-counter ez-toc-grey ez-toc-container-direction\">\n<div class=\"ez-toc-title-container\">\n<p class=\"ez-toc-title\" style=\"cursor:inherit\">Ba\u015fl\u0131klar<\/p>\n<span class=\"ez-toc-title-toggle\"><a href=\"#\" class=\"ez-toc-pull-right ez-toc-btn ez-toc-btn-xs ez-toc-btn-default ez-toc-toggle\" aria-label=\"Toggle Table of Content\"><span class=\"ez-toc-js-icon-con\"><span class=\"\"><span class=\"eztoc-hide\" style=\"display:none;\">Toggle<\/span><span class=\"ez-toc-icon-toggle-span\"><svg style=\"fill: #999;color:#999\" xmlns=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg\" class=\"list-377408\" width=\"20px\" height=\"20px\" viewBox=\"0 0 24 24\" fill=\"none\"><path d=\"M6 6H4v2h2V6zm14 0H8v2h12V6zM4 11h2v2H4v-2zm16 0H8v2h12v-2zM4 16h2v2H4v-2zm16 0H8v2h12v-2z\" fill=\"currentColor\"><\/path><\/svg><svg style=\"fill: #999;color:#999\" class=\"arrow-unsorted-368013\" xmlns=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg\" width=\"10px\" height=\"10px\" viewBox=\"0 0 24 24\" version=\"1.2\" baseProfile=\"tiny\"><path d=\"M18.2 9.3l-6.2-6.3-6.2 6.3c-.2.2-.3.4-.3.7s.1.5.3.7c.2.2.4.3.7.3h11c.3 0 .5-.1.7-.3.2-.2.3-.5.3-.7s-.1-.5-.3-.7zM5.8 14.7l6.2 6.3 6.2-6.3c.2-.2.3-.5.3-.7s-.1-.5-.3-.7c-.2-.2-.4-.3-.7-.3h-11c-.3 0-.5.1-.7.3-.2.2-.3.5-.3.7s.1.5.3.7z\"\/><\/svg><\/span><\/span><\/span><\/a><\/span><\/div>\n<nav><ul class='ez-toc-list ez-toc-list-level-1 ' ><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-1\" href=\"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/g-87-tahdit-kodu-iptal-mahkeme-karari\/#Kararin_Kisa_Ozeti\" >Karar\u0131n K\u0131sa \u00d6zeti<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-2\" href=\"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/g-87-tahdit-kodu-iptal-mahkeme-karari\/#Uyusmazligin_Baslangici_2012_Yilinda_Konulan_G-87_Tahdit_Kodu\" >Uyu\u015fmazl\u0131\u011f\u0131n Ba\u015flang\u0131c\u0131: 2012 Y\u0131l\u0131nda Konulan G-87 Tahdit Kodu<\/a><ul class='ez-toc-list-level-3' ><li class='ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-3\" href=\"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/g-87-tahdit-kodu-iptal-mahkeme-karari\/#Dava_Surecinin_Kronolojisi\" >Dava S\u00fcrecinin Kronolojisi<\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-4\" href=\"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/g-87-tahdit-kodu-iptal-mahkeme-karari\/#Bu_Dosyada_G-87_Tahdit_Kodu_Hangi_Isleme_Dayanak_Olusturdu\" >Bu Dosyada G-87 Tahdit Kodu Hangi \u0130\u015fleme Dayanak Olu\u015fturdu?<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-5\" href=\"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/g-87-tahdit-kodu-iptal-mahkeme-karari\/#15_Yillik_Uzatma_Neden_Ayrica_Onemliydi\" >15 Y\u0131ll\u0131k Uzatma Neden Ayr\u0131ca \u00d6nemliydi?<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-6\" href=\"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/g-87-tahdit-kodu-iptal-mahkeme-karari\/#Idarenin_Savunmasi_ile_Davaci_Tarafin_Iddialari_Neden_Birbirinden_Ayriliyordu\" >\u0130darenin Savunmas\u0131 ile Davac\u0131 Taraf\u0131n \u0130ddialar\u0131 Neden Birbirinden Ayr\u0131l\u0131yordu?<\/a><ul class='ez-toc-list-level-3' ><li class='ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-7\" href=\"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/g-87-tahdit-kodu-iptal-mahkeme-karari\/#Dava_Dilekcesinde_Tartisilan_Iki_Ayri_Islem\" >Dava Dilek\u00e7esinde Tart\u0131\u015f\u0131lan \u0130ki Ayr\u0131 \u0130\u015flem<\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-8\" href=\"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/g-87-tahdit-kodu-iptal-mahkeme-karari\/#Mahkeme_Hangi_Kurumlardan_Bilgi_ve_Belge_Istedi\" >Mahkeme Hangi Kurumlardan Bilgi ve Belge \u0130stedi?<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-9\" href=\"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/g-87-tahdit-kodu-iptal-mahkeme-karari\/#2_Nisan_2026_Tarihli_Ara_Kararin_Hukuki_Onemi_Resen_Arastirma_Ilkesi\" >2 Nisan 2026 Tarihli Ara Karar\u0131n Hukuki \u00d6nemi: Resen Ara\u015ft\u0131rma \u0130lkesi<\/a><ul class='ez-toc-list-level-3' ><li class='ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-10\" href=\"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/g-87-tahdit-kodu-iptal-mahkeme-karari\/#Hangi_Kurumdan_Neden_Bilgi_Istenmesi_Onemlidir\" >Hangi Kurumdan Neden Bilgi \u0130stenmesi \u00d6nemlidir?<\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-11\" href=\"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/g-87-tahdit-kodu-iptal-mahkeme-karari\/#Ankara_26_Idare_Mahkemesinin_Iptal_Gerekcesi\" >Ankara 26. \u0130dare Mahkemesinin \u0130ptal Gerek\u00e7esi<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-12\" href=\"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/g-87-tahdit-kodu-iptal-mahkeme-karari\/#Mahkemenin_Uc_Ayri_Tespiti_Nasil_Bir_Hukuki_Sonuca_Ulasti\" >Mahkemenin \u00dc\u00e7 Ayr\u0131 Tespiti Nas\u0131l Bir Hukuki Sonuca Ula\u015ft\u0131?<\/a><ul class='ez-toc-list-level-3' ><li class='ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-13\" href=\"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/g-87-tahdit-kodu-iptal-mahkeme-karari\/#Somut_Bilgi_ve_Belge_Denildiginde_Ne_Anlasilmalidir\" >Somut Bilgi ve Belge Denildi\u011finde Ne Anla\u015f\u0131lmal\u0131d\u0131r?<\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-14\" href=\"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/g-87-tahdit-kodu-iptal-mahkeme-karari\/#%E2%80%9CKamu_Guvenligi%E2%80%9D_Ifadesi_Neden_Tek_Basina_Yeterli_Degildir\" >\u201cKamu G\u00fcvenli\u011fi\u201d \u0130fadesi Neden Tek Ba\u015f\u0131na Yeterli De\u011fildir?<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-15\" href=\"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/g-87-tahdit-kodu-iptal-mahkeme-karari\/#Danistay_ve_Anayasa_Mahkemesi_Kararlariyla_Birlikte_Nasil_Degerlendirilebilir\" >Dan\u0131\u015ftay ve Anayasa Mahkemesi Kararlar\u0131yla Birlikte Nas\u0131l De\u011ferlendirilebilir?<\/a><ul class='ez-toc-list-level-3' ><li class='ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-16\" href=\"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/g-87-tahdit-kodu-iptal-mahkeme-karari\/#Danistay_10_Dairesinin_2024_Tarihli_G-87_Karari\" >Dan\u0131\u015ftay 10. Dairesinin 2024 Tarihli G-87 Karar\u0131<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-17\" href=\"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/g-87-tahdit-kodu-iptal-mahkeme-karari\/#Anayasa_Mahkemesinin_NO_Basvurusu\" >Anayasa Mahkemesinin N.O. Ba\u015fvurusu<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-18\" href=\"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/g-87-tahdit-kodu-iptal-mahkeme-karari\/#Her_Guvenlik_Kaydinda_Sonuc_Ayni_Olmaz\" >Her G\u00fcvenlik Kayd\u0131nda Sonu\u00e7 Ayn\u0131 Olmaz<\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-19\" href=\"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/g-87-tahdit-kodu-iptal-mahkeme-karari\/#G-87_Tahdit_Kodunun_Iptali_Ne_Sonuc_Dogurur\" >G-87 Tahdit Kodunun \u0130ptali Ne Sonu\u00e7 Do\u011furur?<\/a><ul class='ez-toc-list-level-3' ><li class='ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-20\" href=\"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/g-87-tahdit-kodu-iptal-mahkeme-karari\/#Bu_Karar_Yabancinin_Turkiyeye_Girisini_Otomatik_Olarak_Saglar_mi\" >Bu Karar Yabanc\u0131n\u0131n T\u00fcrkiye\u2019ye Giri\u015fini Otomatik Olarak Sa\u011flar m\u0131?<\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-21\" href=\"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/g-87-tahdit-kodu-iptal-mahkeme-karari\/#Mahkeme_Karari_Sonrasinda_Idari_Kayitlarin_Guncellenmesi_Neden_Ayri_Bir_Konudur\" >Mahkeme Karar\u0131 Sonras\u0131nda \u0130dari Kay\u0131tlar\u0131n G\u00fcncellenmesi Neden Ayr\u0131 Bir Konudur?<\/a><ul class='ez-toc-list-level-3' ><li class='ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-22\" href=\"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/g-87-tahdit-kodu-iptal-mahkeme-karari\/#Giris_Yasagi_ile_Sinir_Disi_Etme_Karari_Ayni_Sey_Degildir\" >Giri\u015f Yasa\u011f\u0131 ile S\u0131n\u0131r D\u0131\u015f\u0131 Etme Karar\u0131 Ayn\u0131 \u015eey De\u011fildir<\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-23\" href=\"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/g-87-tahdit-kodu-iptal-mahkeme-karari\/#Kararin_Diger_Tahdit_Kodu_Davalari_Acisindan_Onemi\" >Karar\u0131n Di\u011fer Tahdit Kodu Davalar\u0131 A\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan \u00d6nemi<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-24\" href=\"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/g-87-tahdit-kodu-iptal-mahkeme-karari\/#C-149_ve_V-69_Kararlarindan_Farki_Ayni_Delil_Sorunu_Farkli_Islemler\" >\u00c7-149 ve V-69 Kararlar\u0131ndan Fark\u0131: Ayn\u0131 Delil Sorunu, Farkl\u0131 \u0130\u015flemler<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-25\" href=\"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/g-87-tahdit-kodu-iptal-mahkeme-karari\/#Benzer_Bir_Giris_Yasagi_Dosyasinda_Hangi_Hususlar_Incelenmelidir\" >Benzer Bir Giri\u015f Yasa\u011f\u0131 Dosyas\u0131nda Hangi Hususlar \u0130ncelenmelidir?<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-26\" href=\"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/g-87-tahdit-kodu-iptal-mahkeme-karari\/#Davaci_Vekilinin_Hukuki_Degerlendirmesi_Dosyayi_Onemli_Kilan_Nedir\" >Davac\u0131 Vekilinin Hukuki De\u011ferlendirmesi: Dosyay\u0131 \u00d6nemli K\u0131lan Nedir?<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-27\" href=\"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/g-87-tahdit-kodu-iptal-mahkeme-karari\/#Sik_Sorulan_Sorular\" >S\u0131k Sorulan Sorular<\/a><ul class='ez-toc-list-level-3' ><li class='ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-28\" href=\"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/g-87-tahdit-kodu-iptal-mahkeme-karari\/#Ankara_26_Idare_Mahkemesinin_G-87_Dosyasinda_Hangi_Islem_Iptal_Edildi\" >Ankara 26. \u0130dare Mahkemesinin G-87 Dosyas\u0131nda Hangi \u0130\u015flem \u0130ptal Edildi?<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-29\" href=\"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/g-87-tahdit-kodu-iptal-mahkeme-karari\/#Bu_Dosyada_15_Yillik_Yasagin_Kaldirilmasinin_Hukuki_Dayanagi_Neydi\" >Bu Dosyada 15 Y\u0131ll\u0131k Yasa\u011f\u0131n Kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n Hukuki Dayana\u011f\u0131 Neydi?<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-30\" href=\"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/g-87-tahdit-kodu-iptal-mahkeme-karari\/#Ilk_G-87_Giris_Yasagi_2012_Yilinda_mi_Konulmustu\" >\u0130lk G-87 Giri\u015f Yasa\u011f\u0131 2012 Y\u0131l\u0131nda m\u0131 Konulmu\u015ftu?<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-31\" href=\"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/g-87-tahdit-kodu-iptal-mahkeme-karari\/#Mahkeme_Hangi_Kurumlardan_Bilgi_ve_Belge_Istedi-2\" >Mahkeme Hangi Kurumlardan Bilgi ve Belge \u0130stedi?<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-32\" href=\"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/g-87-tahdit-kodu-iptal-mahkeme-karari\/#Bu_Kararda_G-87_Icin_Mutlaka_Ceza_Mahkumiyeti_Gerektigi_mi_Soylendi\" >Bu Kararda G-87 \u0130\u00e7in Mutlaka Ceza Mahk\u00fbmiyeti Gerekti\u011fi mi S\u00f6ylendi?<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-33\" href=\"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/g-87-tahdit-kodu-iptal-mahkeme-karari\/#Bes_Yillik_Giris_Yasaginin_15_Yil_Uzatilmasi_ile_Kanundaki_On_Yillik_Ek_Sure_Ayni_Sey_midir\" >Be\u015f Y\u0131ll\u0131k Giri\u015f Yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n 15 Y\u0131l Uzat\u0131lmas\u0131 ile Kanundaki On Y\u0131ll\u0131k Ek S\u00fcre Ayn\u0131 \u015eey midir?<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-34\" href=\"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/g-87-tahdit-kodu-iptal-mahkeme-karari\/#Bu_Kararin_Verilmesi_Giris_Yasagi_Kaydinin_Sistemden_Silindigini_Kanitlar_mi\" >Bu Karar\u0131n Verilmesi Giri\u015f Yasa\u011f\u0131 Kayd\u0131n\u0131n Sistemden Silindi\u011fini Kan\u0131tlar m\u0131?<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-35\" href=\"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/g-87-tahdit-kodu-iptal-mahkeme-karari\/#Bu_Karar_Diger_G-87_Giris_Yasagi_Davalarinda_Kullanilabilir_mi\" >Bu Karar Di\u011fer G-87 Giri\u015f Yasa\u011f\u0131 Davalar\u0131nda Kullan\u0131labilir mi?<\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-36\" href=\"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/g-87-tahdit-kodu-iptal-mahkeme-karari\/#Sonuc_Uzun_Suren_Giris_Yasaginin_Dayanagi_Yargisal_Denetimde_Ortaya_Konulamadi\" >Sonu\u00e7: Uzun S\u00fcren Giri\u015f Yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n Dayana\u011f\u0131 Yarg\u0131sal Denetimde Ortaya Konulamad\u0131<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-37\" href=\"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/g-87-tahdit-kodu-iptal-mahkeme-karari\/#Hukuki_Kaynaklar_ve_Ilgili_Incelemeler\" >Hukuki Kaynaklar ve \u0130lgili \u0130ncelemeler<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-38\" href=\"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/g-87-tahdit-kodu-iptal-mahkeme-karari\/#Yazar_ve_Hukuki_Bilgilendirme\" >Yazar ve Hukuki Bilgilendirme<\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/nav><\/div>\n<article>\n<p><strong>Ankara 26. \u0130dare Mahkemesi, 2012 y\u0131l\u0131nda hakk\u0131nda be\u015f y\u0131l s\u00fcreli G-87 tahdit kodu olu\u015fturulan ve T\u00fcrkiye\u2019ye giri\u015f yasa\u011f\u0131 daha sonra 15 y\u0131l uzat\u0131lan yabanc\u0131 hakk\u0131nda tesis edilen i\u015flemi iptal etti.<\/strong> 29 Eyl\u00fcl 2026 tarihli karar\u0131n belirleyici gerek\u00e7esi, kamu d\u00fczeni ve kamu g\u00fcvenli\u011fi bak\u0131m\u0131ndan ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclen tehdidi destekleyen somut bir bilgi veya belgenin, hatta istihbari nitelikte bir bilginin dahi dosyada bulunmamas\u0131yd\u0131.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Karar\u0131n \u00f6ne \u00e7\u0131kan bulgusu:<\/strong> Mahkeme, 02.04.2026 tarihli ara karar\u0131yla G\u00f6\u00e7 \u0130daresi Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131, Mill\u00ee \u0130stihbarat Te\u015fkil\u00e2t\u0131 Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve emniyet birimlerinden tahdit kodunun dayanaklar\u0131n\u0131 ara\u015ft\u0131rd\u0131. Karar metnine g\u00f6re ilgili kurumlardan bu kayd\u0131 destekleyecek somut belge sunulamad\u0131\u011f\u0131 gibi istihbari nitelikte bir bilgi de ortaya konulamad\u0131. <strong>2012\u2019de ba\u015flayan ve 15 y\u0131l ek s\u00fcreyle uzat\u0131lan k\u0131s\u0131tlamay\u0131 konu alan davada iptal h\u00fckm\u00fc verildi.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Av. Bat\u0131n Y\u0131lmaz taraf\u0131ndan davac\u0131 vekili s\u0131fat\u0131yla a\u00e7\u0131lan ve takip edilen davada, Ankara 26. \u0130dare Mahkemesi yaln\u0131zca idarenin savunmas\u0131n\u0131 de\u011ferlendirmekle yetinmedi; G\u00f6\u00e7 \u0130daresi Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve ilgili g\u00fcvenlik birimlerinden tahdit kodunun dayana\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkin kay\u0131tlar\u0131 da istedi. Ara karar\u0131n ard\u0131ndan ortaya \u00e7\u0131kan tablo, uzun s\u00fcre devam eden bir giri\u015f yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n hangi \u015fartlarda yarg\u0131sal denetimden ge\u00e7ebilece\u011fi bak\u0131m\u0131ndan \u00f6nem ta\u015f\u0131yor.<\/p>\n<p><strong>\u00d6nemli ayr\u0131m:<\/strong> Kararda, 2012 y\u0131l\u0131nda verilen <strong>be\u015f y\u0131ll\u0131k ilk giri\u015f yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n 15 y\u0131l daha uzat\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131<\/strong> belirtiliyor. Buradaki \u201c15 y\u0131l\u201d, ilk yasak karar\u0131ndan bug\u00fcne kadar kesin olarak ge\u00e7en s\u00fcreyi de\u011fil, kararda s\u00f6z\u00fc edilen <strong>ek uzatma s\u00fcresini<\/strong> ifade ediyor. Bu yaz\u0131, karar\u0131n bu ayr\u0131m\u0131n\u0131 esas al\u0131yor.<\/p>\n<h2><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Kararin_Kisa_Ozeti\"><\/span>Karar\u0131n K\u0131sa \u00d6zeti<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n<table>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<th scope=\"row\">Mahkeme<\/th>\n<td>Ankara 26. \u0130dare Mahkemesi<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<th scope=\"row\">Esas numaras\u0131<\/th>\n<td>2025\/3244<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<th scope=\"row\">Karar numaras\u0131<\/th>\n<td>2026\/2355<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<th scope=\"row\">Karar tarihi<\/th>\n<td>29.09.2026<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<th scope=\"row\">Duru\u015fma tarihi<\/th>\n<td>24.09.2026<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<th scope=\"row\">Dava konusu<\/th>\n<td>G-87 tahdit kodu, giri\u015f yasa\u011f\u0131 ve bu yasa\u011f\u0131n 15 y\u0131l uzat\u0131lmas\u0131na ili\u015fkin i\u015flem<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<th scope=\"row\">\u0130lk i\u015flem<\/th>\n<td>29.11.2012 tarih ve 217335 say\u0131l\u0131 i\u015flem<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<th scope=\"row\">Daval\u0131 idareler<\/th>\n<td>G\u00f6\u00e7 \u0130daresi Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve Emniyet Genel M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<th scope=\"row\">Davac\u0131 vekili<\/th>\n<td>Av. Bat\u0131n Y\u0131lmaz<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<th scope=\"row\">Sonu\u00e7<\/th>\n<td>Dava konusu i\u015flemin iptali<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<h2><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Uyusmazligin_Baslangici_2012_Yilinda_Konulan_G-87_Tahdit_Kodu\"><\/span>Uyu\u015fmazl\u0131\u011f\u0131n Ba\u015flang\u0131c\u0131: 2012 Y\u0131l\u0131nda Konulan G-87 Tahdit Kodu<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n<p>Dava dosyas\u0131nda yer alan bilgilere g\u00f6re yabanc\u0131 hakk\u0131nda 2012 y\u0131l\u0131nda <strong>be\u015f y\u0131l s\u00fcreli G-87 tahdit kodu<\/strong> tesis edildi. Daha sonraki s\u00fcre\u00e7te bu yasa\u011f\u0131n s\u00fcresi 15 y\u0131l daha uzat\u0131ld\u0131. B\u00f6ylece 2012\u2019de ba\u015flayan idari k\u0131s\u0131tlaman\u0131n etkileri \u00e7ok uzun bir d\u00f6neme yay\u0131ld\u0131.<\/p>\n<p>\u0130ncelenen davada uyu\u015fmazl\u0131k, yaln\u0131zca veri taban\u0131nda bir kod bulunmas\u0131yla s\u0131n\u0131rl\u0131 de\u011fildi. Davac\u0131 hakk\u0131nda T\u00fcrkiye\u2019ye giri\u015f yasa\u011f\u0131 sonucunu do\u011furan ilk i\u015flem ve bu yasa\u011f\u0131n uzat\u0131lmas\u0131na ili\u015fkin idari tasarruf yarg\u0131 \u00f6n\u00fcne ta\u015f\u0131nd\u0131. Davac\u0131 taraf, gerek ilk tedbirin gerekse uzatma i\u015fleminin ki\u015fiye \u00f6zg\u00fc, do\u011frulanabilir bir gerek\u00e7eye dayanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ileri s\u00fcrd\u00fc.<\/p>\n<p>Bu noktada \u00f6nemli olan husus, kamu g\u00fcvenli\u011fi gerek\u00e7esinin idare taraf\u0131ndan ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclm\u00fc\u015f olmas\u0131 de\u011fil, <strong>bu gerek\u00e7enin davac\u0131n\u0131n \u015fahsi durumuyla ili\u015fkilendirilerek hukuken denetlenebilir \u015fekilde a\u00e7\u0131klan\u0131p a\u00e7\u0131klanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131d\u0131r.<\/strong><\/p>\n<h3><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Dava_Surecinin_Kronolojisi\"><\/span>Dava S\u00fcrecinin Kronolojisi<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Tarih<\/th>\n<th>Geli\u015fme<\/th>\n<th>Hukuki \u00f6nemi<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>29.11.2012<\/td>\n<td>G-87 tahdit koduna ili\u015fkin ilk i\u015flem tesis edildi.<\/td>\n<td>Be\u015f y\u0131ll\u0131k giri\u015f yasa\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkin ba\u015flang\u0131\u00e7 i\u015flemi.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Sonraki s\u00fcre\u00e7<\/td>\n<td>\u0130lk giri\u015f yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n s\u00fcresi 15 y\u0131l daha uzat\u0131ld\u0131.<\/td>\n<td>Davada ayr\u0131ca incelenen uzatma tasarrufu.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>2025<\/td>\n<td>Ankara 26. \u0130dare Mahkemesinin 2025\/3244 esas say\u0131l\u0131 dosyas\u0131nda dava g\u00f6r\u00fcld\u00fc.<\/td>\n<td>\u0130lk i\u015flem ve uzatma yarg\u0131sal denetime ta\u015f\u0131nd\u0131.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>02.04.2026<\/td>\n<td>Mahkeme, ilgili idare ve g\u00fcvenlik birimlerine ara karar g\u00f6nderdi.<\/td>\n<td>Tahdit kayd\u0131n\u0131n maddi dayana\u011f\u0131 ara\u015ft\u0131r\u0131ld\u0131.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>24.09.2026<\/td>\n<td>Davac\u0131 vekili Av. Bat\u0131n Y\u0131lmaz&#8217;\u0131n da kat\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 duru\u015fma yap\u0131ld\u0131.<\/td>\n<td>Taraflar\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131klamalar\u0131 dinlendi.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>29.09.2026<\/td>\n<td>Mahkeme dava konusu i\u015flemin iptaline oybirli\u011fiyle karar verdi.<\/td>\n<td>\u0130lk derece yarg\u0131lamas\u0131nda iptal h\u00fckm\u00fc kuruldu.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p><em>Not: Uzatma i\u015fleminin kesin tesis tarihi, incelenen gerek\u00e7eli karar metninde ayr\u0131ca belirtilmedi\u011fi i\u00e7in kronolojide varsay\u0131msal bir tarih kullan\u0131lmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/em><\/p>\n<h2><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Bu_Dosyada_G-87_Tahdit_Kodu_Hangi_Isleme_Dayanak_Olusturdu\"><\/span>Bu Dosyada G-87 Tahdit Kodu Hangi \u0130\u015fleme Dayanak Olu\u015fturdu?<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n<p>G-87 kodu, g\u00f6\u00e7 idaresi uygulamas\u0131nda kamu d\u00fczeni ve kamu g\u00fcvenli\u011fi de\u011ferlendirmeleriyle ba\u011flant\u0131l\u0131 kullan\u0131lan idari kay\u0131tlar aras\u0131ndad\u0131r. Ancak bu karar incelemesinin konusu kodun b\u00fct\u00fcn y\u00f6nleriyle anlat\u0131lmas\u0131 de\u011fil, <strong>2012 tarihli ilk G-87 i\u015flemi ile sonradan tesis edilen uzatman\u0131n Ankara 26. \u0130dare Mahkemesinde nas\u0131l denetlendi\u011fidir.<\/strong> G-87 kayd\u0131n\u0131n varl\u0131\u011f\u0131 tek ba\u015f\u0131na belirli bir su\u00e7un i\u015flendi\u011fi ya da ceza mahk\u00fbmiyeti bulundu\u011fu anlam\u0131na gelmez.<\/p>\n<p>Kodun anlam\u0131, idari sorgulama yollar\u0131, dava a\u00e7ma ko\u015fullar\u0131 ve di\u011fer tahdit t\u00fcrleriyle ili\u015fkisi i\u00e7in <a href=\"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/g-87-tahdit-kodu-nedir-nasil-kaldirilir-2026-guncel-rehber\/\">G-87 tahdit kodu ana rehberimize<\/a> bakabilirsiniz. B\u00fct\u00fcn kodlar\u0131n ortak hukuki \u00e7er\u00e7evesini ise <a href=\"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/tahdit-kodu-nedir-nasil-kaldirilir\/\">tahdit kodlar\u0131 rehberimizde<\/a> a\u00e7\u0131kl\u0131yoruz. Burada tekrara girmek yerine, uyu\u015fmazl\u0131\u011f\u0131n ay\u0131rt edici y\u00f6nlerine odaklan\u0131yoruz.<\/p>\n<h2><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"15_Yillik_Uzatma_Neden_Ayrica_Onemliydi\"><\/span>15 Y\u0131ll\u0131k Uzatma Neden Ayr\u0131ca \u00d6nemliydi?<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n<p>Giri\u015f yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n yaln\u0131zca varl\u0131\u011f\u0131 de\u011fil, <strong>s\u00fcresi ve uzat\u0131lma gerek\u00e7esi<\/strong> de hukuki denetimin konusudur. Bu dosyada 2012 y\u0131l\u0131nda be\u015f y\u0131l i\u00e7in tesis edilen bir G-87 kayd\u0131n\u0131n 15 y\u0131l daha uzat\u0131lmas\u0131, yasa\u011f\u0131n s\u00fcre bak\u0131m\u0131ndan ola\u011fan idari tedbirlerden \u00e7ok daha a\u011f\u0131r sonu\u00e7lar do\u011furmas\u0131 anlam\u0131na geliyordu.<\/p>\n<p>6458 say\u0131l\u0131 Yabanc\u0131lar ve Uluslararas\u0131 Koruma Kanunu&#8217;nun 9. maddesinin \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc f\u0131kras\u0131na g\u00f6re giri\u015f yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n s\u00fcresi kural olarak en fazla be\u015f y\u0131ld\u0131r. Kamu d\u00fczeni veya kamu g\u00fcvenli\u011fi a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan ciddi tehdit bulunmas\u0131 h\u00e2linde bu s\u00fcre en fazla on y\u0131l daha art\u0131r\u0131labilir. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla mevzuat, uzatmay\u0131 s\u00fcre ve gerek\u00e7e y\u00f6n\u00fcnden s\u0131n\u0131rland\u0131rmaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p>Burada iki noktay\u0131 birbirinden ay\u0131rmak gerekir. <strong>Birincisi,<\/strong> 2012 tarihli ilk i\u015flem tesis edildi\u011finde y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckte bulunan mevzuat ile sonradan y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe giren 6458 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun&#8217;un zamansal uygulamas\u0131 ayr\u0131ca de\u011ferlendirilmelidir. <strong>\u0130kincisi,<\/strong> bu dosyada mahkemenin a\u00e7\u0131k iptal gerek\u00e7esi yaln\u0131zca s\u00fcrenin uzunlu\u011fu veya yasal azami s\u00fcrenin a\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131 de\u011fildir. Mahkeme, <strong>tahdit kayd\u0131n\u0131 hakl\u0131 g\u00f6sterecek somut bilgi, belge ve istihbari verinin bulunmamas\u0131<\/strong> \u00fczerinde durarak iptal sonucuna ula\u015fm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p>Bu nedenle karar, \u201cuzun giri\u015f yasaklar\u0131 her durumda kendili\u011finden ge\u00e7ersizdir\u201d \u015feklinde yorumlanamaz. Ancak y\u0131llar boyunca etkisini s\u00fcrd\u00fcren a\u011f\u0131r idari tedbirlerin, yeterli dayanak olmaks\u0131z\u0131n korunamayaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 g\u00f6stermesi bak\u0131m\u0131ndan dikkat \u00e7ekicidir.<\/p>\n<h2><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Idarenin_Savunmasi_ile_Davaci_Tarafin_Iddialari_Neden_Birbirinden_Ayriliyordu\"><\/span>\u0130darenin Savunmas\u0131 ile Davac\u0131 Taraf\u0131n \u0130ddialar\u0131 Neden Birbirinden Ayr\u0131l\u0131yordu?<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n<p>Davan\u0131n taraflar\u0131 aras\u0131nda esasl\u0131 bir g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f ayr\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 vard\u0131. Davac\u0131 taraf, be\u015f y\u0131ll\u0131k ilk giri\u015f yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n <strong>gerek\u00e7esiz ve somut delile dayand\u0131r\u0131lmadan 15 y\u0131l daha uzat\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131<\/strong> ileri s\u00fcrd\u00fc. Buradaki itiraz, yaln\u0131zca s\u00fcrenin uzunlu\u011fundan ibaret de\u011fildi. Davac\u0131, kendisi hakk\u0131nda a\u011f\u0131r sonu\u00e7 do\u011furan G-87 kayd\u0131n\u0131n hangi davran\u0131\u015f, olay veya g\u00fcvenlik bilgisi nedeniyle korundu\u011funun ortaya konulmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 savundu.<\/p>\n<p>G\u00f6\u00e7 \u0130daresi Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 ise davac\u0131n\u0131n kamu d\u00fczeni ve kamu g\u00fcvenli\u011fi bak\u0131m\u0131ndan tehdit olu\u015fturdu\u011funu, i\u015flemin mevzuata uygun oldu\u011funu belirterek davan\u0131n reddini istedi. Emniyet Genel M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc, dava konusu i\u015flem bak\u0131m\u0131ndan esas yetkili makam\u0131n G\u00f6\u00e7 \u0130daresi Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 oldu\u011fu g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fc bildirdi; ayr\u0131ca i\u015flemin hukuk ve usule uygun oldu\u011funu savundu. B\u00f6ylece mahkeme \u00f6n\u00fcndeki hukuki tart\u0131\u015fma, bir tarafta kamu g\u00fcvenli\u011fini sa\u011flama yetkisi, di\u011fer tarafta bu yetkinin <strong>hangi ki\u015fisel bilgi ve belgelerle gerek\u00e7elendirildi\u011fi<\/strong> noktas\u0131nda yo\u011funla\u015ft\u0131.<\/p>\n<p>Burada dikkat edilmesi gereken nokta \u015fudur: Bir idarenin \u201ckamu g\u00fcvenli\u011fi y\u00f6n\u00fcnden tehdit\u201d savunmas\u0131 yapmas\u0131, bu de\u011ferlendirmeyi destekleyen olaylar\u0131n yarg\u0131lamada bulundu\u011fu anlam\u0131na gelmez. \u0130dari makam\u0131n takdirini kullanabilmesi ile takdirin olgusal dayana\u011f\u0131n\u0131n mahkemece ara\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 iki ayr\u0131 a\u015famad\u0131r. Ankara 26. \u0130dare Mahkemesi bu ayr\u0131m\u0131 ortaya \u00e7\u0131karmak i\u00e7in yaln\u0131zca savunma dilek\u00e7eleriyle yetinmedi; ara kararla dosyan\u0131n maddi temelini de ara\u015ft\u0131rd\u0131.<\/p>\n<h3><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Dava_Dilekcesinde_Tartisilan_Iki_Ayri_Islem\"><\/span>Dava Dilek\u00e7esinde Tart\u0131\u015f\u0131lan \u0130ki Ayr\u0131 \u0130\u015flem<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n<p>Mahkeme karar\u0131n\u0131n \u201cDavan\u0131n \u00d6zeti\u201d b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcne g\u00f6re iptali istenen i\u015flemler, <strong>29.11.2012 tarih ve 217335 say\u0131l\u0131 G-87 i\u015flemi<\/strong> ile buna ili\u015fkin uzatma i\u015flemidir. Bu ifade \u00f6nemlidir; \u00e7\u00fcnk\u00fc bir giri\u015f yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ilk tesis edilmesi ile daha sonraki tarihte uzat\u0131lmas\u0131, ayn\u0131 ki\u015fi bak\u0131m\u0131ndan birbirine ba\u011fl\u0131 olsa bile gerek\u00e7e, yetki, s\u00fcre ve i\u015flem tarihi a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan ayr\u0131 incelemeler gerektirebilir.<\/p>\n<p>\u0130lk i\u015flem tarihinin 2012 olmas\u0131, dosyaya ayr\u0131ca zamansal bir boyut kazand\u0131rmaktad\u0131r. 6458 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun 2013 y\u0131l\u0131nda kabul edilmi\u015f oldu\u011fundan, 2012 tarihli i\u015flemin tesisinde uygulanm\u0131\u015f mevzuat ile daha sonra verilen uzatma karar\u0131n\u0131n hukuki \u00e7er\u00e7evesinin birbirinden ayr\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekir. Ancak incelenen kararda mahkeme, <strong>\u201c15 y\u0131ll\u0131k uzatma kanundaki \u00fcst s\u0131n\u0131r\u0131 a\u015ft\u0131\u011f\u0131 i\u00e7in iptal\u201d<\/strong> bi\u00e7iminde ayr\u0131 bir gerek\u00e7e kurmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. \u0130ptal sonucunu dayanak somut bilgi, belge ve istihbari bilgi yoklu\u011fu \u00fczerinden temellendirmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<h2><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Mahkeme_Hangi_Kurumlardan_Bilgi_ve_Belge_Istedi\"><\/span>Mahkeme Hangi Kurumlardan Bilgi ve Belge \u0130stedi?<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n<p>Yarg\u0131laman\u0131n en \u00f6nemli a\u015famas\u0131, Ankara 26. \u0130dare Mahkemesinin <strong>2 Nisan 2026 tarihli ara karar\u0131d\u0131r.<\/strong> Mahkeme, G-87 kodunun neden olu\u015fturuldu\u011funu ve hangi verilere dayand\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131kl\u0131\u011fa kavu\u015fturmak amac\u0131yla a\u015fa\u011f\u0131daki kurumlardan bilgi ve belge istedi:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>G\u00f6\u00e7 \u0130daresi Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131,<\/li>\n<li>Mill\u00ee \u0130stihbarat Te\u015fkil\u00e2t\u0131 Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131,<\/li>\n<li>Emniyet Genel M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc \u0130stihbarat Daire Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131,<\/li>\n<li>Emniyet Genel M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Mahkeme bu kurumlara yaln\u0131zca genel bir g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f sormad\u0131; <strong>davac\u0131ya uygulanan tahdit kodunun dayana\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkin somut tespitleri<\/strong> ara\u015ft\u0131rd\u0131. \u0130lgili idarelerin cevaplar\u0131nda ise tahdit kodunu hakl\u0131 g\u00f6sterebilecek herhangi bir somut bilgi ve belge sunulmad\u0131.<\/p>\n<p>Karardaki tespit bunun da \u00f6tesine ge\u00e7iyor. Mahkeme, davac\u0131 hakk\u0131nda tahdit kayd\u0131n\u0131n olu\u015fturulmas\u0131n\u0131 gerektiren <strong>istihbari nitelikte bilginin de bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131<\/strong> belirtiyor. B\u00f6ylece soyut g\u00fcvenlik savunmas\u0131 ile ki\u015fiye \u00f6zg\u00fc dayana\u011f\u0131n varl\u0131\u011f\u0131 aras\u0131ndaki fark, uyu\u015fmazl\u0131\u011f\u0131n sonucunu belirledi.<\/p>\n<h2><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"2_Nisan_2026_Tarihli_Ara_Kararin_Hukuki_Onemi_Resen_Arastirma_Ilkesi\"><\/span>2 Nisan 2026 Tarihli Ara Karar\u0131n Hukuki \u00d6nemi: Resen Ara\u015ft\u0131rma \u0130lkesi<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n<p>\u0130dari yarg\u0131lamada mahkeme, uyu\u015fmazl\u0131\u011f\u0131 yaln\u0131zca taraflar\u0131n getirdi\u011fi s\u0131n\u0131rl\u0131 belgeler \u00fczerinden de\u011ferlendirmek zorunda de\u011fildir. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.mevzuat.gov.tr\/MevzuatMetin\/1.5.2577.pdf\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">2577 say\u0131l\u0131 \u0130dari Yarg\u0131lama Usul\u00fc Kanunu&#8217;nun 20. maddesi<\/a> uyar\u0131nca mahkemeler bakmakta olduklar\u0131 davalarla ilgili gerekli incelemeyi kendili\u011finden yapabilir ve ihtiya\u00e7 duyduklar\u0131 bilgi ile belgeleri ilgili kurumlardan isteyebilir. Bu, \u00f6zellikle i\u015flemin dayana\u011f\u0131n\u0131n a\u011f\u0131rl\u0131kl\u0131 olarak idarenin kay\u0131tlar\u0131nda bulundu\u011fu uyu\u015fmazl\u0131klarda \u00f6nem ta\u015f\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p>Somut davada G-87 kayd\u0131na yol a\u00e7t\u0131\u011f\u0131 ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclen g\u00fcvenlik de\u011ferlendirmesinin temel belgeleri, davac\u0131n\u0131n do\u011frudan eri\u015febilece\u011fi nitelikte olmayabilir. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla yaln\u0131zca \u201cdavac\u0131 idarenin ileri s\u00fcrd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc tehdidin mevcut olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 kan\u0131tlayamad\u0131\u201d bi\u00e7iminde bir yakla\u015f\u0131m benimsenmesi, idarenin elindeki bilginin ger\u00e7ekli\u011fini ara\u015ft\u0131rma ihtiyac\u0131n\u0131 ortadan kald\u0131rmaz. Mahkemenin 02.04.2026 tarihli ara karar\u0131yla <strong>daval\u0131 idareden ve ilgili g\u00fcvenlik kurumlar\u0131ndan somut tespit istemesi<\/strong>, uyu\u015fmazl\u0131\u011f\u0131n esas\u0131n\u0131 ortaya \u00e7\u0131karan a\u015fama olmu\u015ftur.<\/p>\n<h3><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Hangi_Kurumdan_Neden_Bilgi_Istenmesi_Onemlidir\"><\/span>Hangi Kurumdan Neden Bilgi \u0130stenmesi \u00d6nemlidir?<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n<p>G\u00f6\u00e7 \u0130daresi Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 dava konusu yabanc\u0131lar hukuku i\u015fleminin idari boyutuyla ilgiliyken, Emniyet Genel M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc ve \u0130stihbarat Daire Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00fcvenlik de\u011ferlendirmesinin dayana\u011f\u0131n\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131klayabilecek kurumlardand\u0131r. Mill\u00ee \u0130stihbarat Te\u015fkil\u00e2t\u0131 Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan da bilgi istenmi\u015f olmas\u0131, mahkemenin kay\u0131tlar\u0131n kayna\u011f\u0131n\u0131 \u00e7ok y\u00f6nl\u00fc ara\u015ft\u0131rma yolunu tercih etti\u011fini g\u00f6sterir. Ancak ara kararda bir kurumun ad\u0131n\u0131n yer almas\u0131, o kurumun davac\u0131 hakk\u0131nda mutlaka olumsuz bir rapor d\u00fczenledi\u011fi anlam\u0131na gelmez.<\/p>\n<p>Mahkeme karar\u0131ndaki sonu\u00e7 a\u00e7\u0131k bi\u00e7imde \u015fudur: \u0130lgili idareler, tahdit kodunun olu\u015fturulmas\u0131na dayanak olabilecek somut bilgi veya belge ibraz etmemi\u015ftir. Mahkemenin ayr\u0131ca istihbari nitelikte bilgi de bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 kaydetmesi, bu davay\u0131 sadece \u201cevrak eksikli\u011fi\u201d tart\u0131\u015fmas\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6tesine ta\u015f\u0131maktad\u0131r. Bu belirleme karar metninde yer alan mahkeme tespitidir; b\u00fct\u00fcn g\u00fcvenlik birimlerinin ar\u015fivlerinde hi\u00e7bir kay\u0131t bulunamayaca\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkin genel ve s\u0131n\u0131rs\u0131z bir iddia olarak okunmamal\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n<h2><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Ankara_26_Idare_Mahkemesinin_Iptal_Gerekcesi\"><\/span>Ankara 26. \u0130dare Mahkemesinin \u0130ptal Gerek\u00e7esi<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n<p>Mahkemenin gerek\u00e7esi \u00fc\u00e7 temel tespit \u00fczerinde \u015fekillendi:<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>Davac\u0131 hakk\u0131nda tahdit kodunu destekleyen bir <strong>adli veya idari i\u015flemin<\/strong> bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 de\u011ferlendirildi.<\/li>\n<li>Tahdit kodunun tesis edilmesine dayanak olu\u015fturacak <strong>somut bir bilgi veya belge<\/strong> ortaya konulamad\u0131.<\/li>\n<li>Davac\u0131 hakk\u0131nda kayd\u0131 hakl\u0131 g\u00f6sterecek <strong>istihbari nitelikte bilgi<\/strong> de bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 tespit edildi.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<blockquote>\n<p>\u201cDavac\u0131 hakk\u0131nda tesis edilen dava konusu i\u015flemde hukuka uyarl\u0131k bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 sonucuna var\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p><em>Bu ifade, Ankara 26. \u0130dare Mahkemesinin 29.09.2026 tarihli, E.2025\/3244, K.2026\/2355 say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131n\u0131n gerek\u00e7e b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcnden al\u0131nm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/em><\/p>\n<p>Sonu\u00e7 olarak mahkeme, G-87 tahdit koduyla ba\u011flant\u0131l\u0131 dava konusu i\u015flemin <strong>iptaline oybirli\u011fiyle<\/strong> karar verdi. Ayr\u0131ca 1.824,30 TL yarg\u0131lama gideri ile karar tarihinde y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckteki tarifeye g\u00f6re belirlenen 40.000 TL vek\u00e2let \u00fccretinin daval\u0131 idarelerden al\u0131narak davac\u0131ya verilmesine h\u00fckmetti.<\/p>\n<h2><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Mahkemenin_Uc_Ayri_Tespiti_Nasil_Bir_Hukuki_Sonuca_Ulasti\"><\/span>Mahkemenin \u00dc\u00e7 Ayr\u0131 Tespiti Nas\u0131l Bir Hukuki Sonuca Ula\u015ft\u0131?<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n<p>Karar metni dikkatle okundu\u011funda mahkemenin gerek\u00e7esinin tek c\u00fcmlelik \u201cdelil yoklu\u011fu\u201d de\u011ferlendirmesinden olu\u015fmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fcl\u00fcr. Mahkeme, davac\u0131 hakk\u0131nda <strong>herhangi bir adli veya idari i\u015flem tesis edilmemi\u015f olmas\u0131n\u0131<\/strong>, tahdit kodunun dayana\u011f\u0131 <strong>somut belge bulunmamas\u0131n\u0131<\/strong> ve <strong>istihbari nitelikte bilgi de bulunmamas\u0131n\u0131<\/strong> birlikte de\u011ferlendirmi\u015ftir. Bu \u00fc\u00e7 unsur, davac\u0131n\u0131n kamu d\u00fczeni veya g\u00fcvenli\u011fi bak\u0131m\u0131ndan tehdit olu\u015fturdu\u011fu y\u00f6n\u00fcndeki savunma ile idari dosyada ortaya konulan maddi i\u00e7erik aras\u0131nda ba\u011flant\u0131 kurulamad\u0131\u011f\u0131 sonucuna g\u00f6t\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr.<\/p>\n<p>Buradaki ilk tespit, her G-87 kayd\u0131n\u0131n mutlaka bir ceza soru\u015fturmas\u0131na dayanmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi anlam\u0131na gelmez. \u0130darenin kamu g\u00fcvenli\u011fi bak\u0131m\u0131ndan yapaca\u011f\u0131 de\u011ferlendirme, baz\u0131 durumlarda ceza mahk\u00fbmiyetinden ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z olabilir. \u0130kinci tespit ise somut olaya ili\u015fkin belge bulunup bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na odaklan\u0131r. \u00dc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc tespit, g\u00fcvenlik tahditlerinde ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclebilecek istihbari temelin de bu uyu\u015fmazl\u0131kta g\u00f6sterilememi\u015f oldu\u011funu anlat\u0131r. Sonu\u00e7, <strong>mahkemenin dava konusu G-87 i\u015flemini iptal etmesidir.<\/strong><\/p>\n<h3><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Somut_Bilgi_ve_Belge_Denildiginde_Ne_Anlasilmalidir\"><\/span>Somut Bilgi ve Belge Denildi\u011finde Ne Anla\u015f\u0131lmal\u0131d\u0131r?<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n<p>\u0130\u015flem dosyas\u0131n\u0131n niteli\u011fine g\u00f6re resm\u00ee yaz\u0131\u015fmalar, olay tutanaklar\u0131, adli kay\u0131tlar, s\u0131n\u0131r ge\u00e7i\u015f kay\u0131tlar\u0131, kurumlar aras\u0131 bilgi talepleri, tarih ve kaynak bilgisi bulunan g\u00fcvenlik de\u011ferlendirmeleri veya ki\u015fiye \u00f6zg\u00fc ba\u015fka tespitler tart\u0131\u015fma konusu olabilir. Ancak bunlardan hangisinin yeterli oldu\u011fu, i\u00e7eri\u011fi ve hukuka uygun \u015fekilde elde edilmesi ayr\u0131ca de\u011ferlendirilmeden belirlenemez. \u0130darenin \u201columsuz istihbarat vard\u0131r\u201d y\u00f6n\u00fcndeki ifadesi ile bu iddian\u0131n ki\u015fi, zaman ve olay ba\u011flant\u0131s\u0131n\u0131n kurulabilmesi farkl\u0131 \u015feylerdir.<\/p>\n<p>\u0130ncelenen davada \u00f6nemli olan, davac\u0131 taraf\u0131n belirli bir belgeyi \u00e7\u00fcr\u00fctm\u00fc\u015f olmas\u0131 de\u011fil; mahkeme ilgili kaynaklardan ara\u015ft\u0131rma yapt\u0131rd\u0131\u011f\u0131 h\u00e2lde <strong>i\u015fleme esas al\u0131nabilecek belgenin veya istihbari bilginin ortaya konulamamas\u0131d\u0131r.<\/strong> Bu nedenle karar\u0131n as\u0131l \u00f6zg\u00fcnl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc, yaln\u0131zca uzun s\u00fcreli yasa\u011f\u0131n iptali de\u011fil, iptal gerek\u00e7esinin ara\u015ft\u0131rma y\u00f6ntemiyle a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a ba\u011flant\u0131l\u0131 olmas\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n<h2><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"%E2%80%9CKamu_Guvenligi%E2%80%9D_Ifadesi_Neden_Tek_Basina_Yeterli_Degildir\"><\/span>\u201cKamu G\u00fcvenli\u011fi\u201d \u0130fadesi Neden Tek Ba\u015f\u0131na Yeterli De\u011fildir?<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n<p>Devletin, yabanc\u0131lar\u0131n \u00fclkeye kabul\u00fcne ili\u015fkin olarak kamu d\u00fczenini ve kamu g\u00fcvenli\u011fini koruma yetkisi bulunmaktad\u0131r. Ancak idareye verilen takdir yetkisi, tesis edilen i\u015flemlerin yarg\u0131sal denetim d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda kald\u0131\u011f\u0131 anlam\u0131na gelmez.<\/p>\n<p>\u0130dari i\u015flemin sebep unsurunun denetlenebilmesi i\u00e7in, i\u015flemin hangi maddi olgularla ba\u011flant\u0131l\u0131 oldu\u011funun ortaya konulabilmesi gerekir. Baz\u0131 g\u00fcvenlik bilgilerinin niteli\u011fi gere\u011fi gizli olmas\u0131 m\u00fcmk\u00fcnd\u00fcr; bununla birlikte gizlilik, i\u015flemin hi\u00e7bir dayana\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6sterilmeden s\u00fcrd\u00fcr\u00fclmesini kendili\u011finden hakl\u0131 k\u0131lmaz.<\/p>\n<p>\u0130ncelenen davan\u0131n \u00f6zg\u00fcn y\u00f6n\u00fc, kamu g\u00fcvenli\u011fi gerek\u00e7esinin yaln\u0131zca ayr\u0131nt\u0131land\u0131r\u0131lmam\u0131\u015f olmas\u0131 de\u011fildir. Mahkeme, ilgili kurumlardan a\u00e7\u0131klama ve belge talep etti\u011fi h\u00e2lde <strong>hem somut delil hem de istihbari nitelikte destekleyici bilgi y\u00f6n\u00fcnden bo\u015fluk<\/strong> bulundu\u011funu tespit etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p>Benzer tart\u0131\u015fma, Dan\u0131\u015ftay\u0131n G-87 kay\u0131tlar\u0131na ili\u015fkin kararlar\u0131nda da g\u00f6r\u00fclmektedir. \u00d6rne\u011fin <a href=\"https:\/\/mevzuat.adalet.gov.tr\/ictihat\/1134716900\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">Dan\u0131\u015ftay karar ar\u015fivindeki G-87 uyu\u015fmazl\u0131\u011f\u0131nda<\/a> da dayanak bilgi ve belgelerin istenmesi ve idarece somut veri sunulup sunulmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 incelenmi\u015ftir. Bununla birlikte her karar, kendi taraflar\u0131 ve olgular\u0131 bak\u0131m\u0131ndan de\u011ferlendirilmelidir; bu davan\u0131n h\u00fckm\u00fc ba\u015fka ki\u015filer i\u00e7in do\u011frudan sonu\u00e7 do\u011furmaz.<\/p>\n<h2><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Danistay_ve_Anayasa_Mahkemesi_Kararlariyla_Birlikte_Nasil_Degerlendirilebilir\"><\/span>Dan\u0131\u015ftay ve Anayasa Mahkemesi Kararlar\u0131yla Birlikte Nas\u0131l De\u011ferlendirilebilir?<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n<p>G-87 konulu yarg\u0131 kararlar\u0131 birbirinin ayn\u0131s\u0131 de\u011fildir. Bir uyu\u015fmazl\u0131kta somut g\u00fcvenlik de\u011ferlendirmesi bulunurken ba\u015fka bir uyu\u015fmazl\u0131kta idari i\u015flem gerek\u00e7esinin mahkemeye sunulmam\u0131\u015f olmas\u0131 m\u00fcmk\u00fcnd\u00fcr. Bu nedenle \u00f6rnek kararlar\u0131n ortak noktalar\u0131 kadar farkl\u0131 sonu\u00e7lara neden olan maddi olaylar\u0131n da incelenmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n<h3><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Danistay_10_Dairesinin_2024_Tarihli_G-87_Karari\"><\/span>Dan\u0131\u015ftay 10. Dairesinin 2024 Tarihli G-87 Karar\u0131<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/mevzuat.adalet.gov.tr\/ictihat\/1134716900\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">Dan\u0131\u015ftay 10. Dairesinin E.2020\/4631, K.2024\/5214 say\u0131l\u0131 ve 21.11.2024 tarihli karar\u0131nda<\/a>, uyu\u015fmazl\u0131\u011fa konu G-87 kay\u0131tlar\u0131n\u0131n dayana\u011f\u0131 bilgi ve belgeler ara\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lm\u0131\u015f; ayr\u0131ca kay\u0131tlar\u0131n idarece kald\u0131r\u0131lm\u0131\u015f olmas\u0131 da de\u011ferlendirilmi\u015ftir. Dan\u0131\u015ftay, tahdit kay\u0131tlar\u0131n\u0131n kald\u0131r\u0131lma sebeplerinin ara\u015ft\u0131r\u0131larak yeniden karar verilmesi gerekti\u011fine i\u015faret etmi\u015f ve \u00f6nceki ret h\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fc bozmu\u015ftur. Bu karar, Ankara 26. \u0130dare Mahkemesinin 2026 tarihli karar\u0131yla ayn\u0131 somut olaya ili\u015fkin de\u011fildir; ancak tahdit i\u015fleminin dayana\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ara\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 gereklili\u011fi bak\u0131m\u0131ndan kar\u015f\u0131la\u015ft\u0131rmaya elveri\u015flidir.<\/p>\n<h3><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Anayasa_Mahkemesinin_NO_Basvurusu\"><\/span>Anayasa Mahkemesinin N.O. Ba\u015fvurusu<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/eski--kararlarbilgibankasi.anayasa.gov.tr\/BB\/2018\/36798\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">Anayasa Mahkemesinin N.O. ba\u015fvurusuna ili\u015fkin B. No: 2018\/36798, 17.11.2021 tarihli karar\u0131nda<\/a> ise G-87 ba\u011flant\u0131l\u0131 giri\u015f yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ki\u015finin aile hayat\u0131na etkisi de\u011ferlendirilmi\u015ftir. Y\u00fcksek Mahkeme, idarenin g\u00fcvenlik savunmas\u0131n\u0131n somutla\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmamas\u0131 ve derece mahkemesince yaln\u0131zca \u015fekl\u00ee denetimle yetinilmesi \u00fczerinde durmu\u015ftur. Bu karar\u0131n hukuki inceleme kapsam\u0131, aile hayat\u0131na sayg\u0131 hakk\u0131 iddias\u0131yla s\u0131n\u0131rl\u0131d\u0131r; dolay\u0131s\u0131yla eldeki dosyayla birebir ayn\u0131 h\u00fck\u00fcm olarak sunulamaz.<\/p>\n<h3><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Her_Guvenlik_Kaydinda_Sonuc_Ayni_Olmaz\"><\/span>Her G\u00fcvenlik Kayd\u0131nda Sonu\u00e7 Ayn\u0131 Olmaz<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n<p>Yarg\u0131sal de\u011ferlendirmede idarenin elinde somut, ilgili ve hukuken denetlenebilir bilgi bulunmas\u0131 ba\u015fka sonu\u00e7lara yol a\u00e7abilir. <a href=\"https:\/\/eski--kararlarbilgibankasi.anayasa.gov.tr\/BB\/2018\/29245\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">Anayasa Mahkemesi karar ar\u015fivindeki ba\u015fka G-87 uyu\u015fmazl\u0131klar\u0131<\/a> da somut olay\u0131n, istihbarat\u0131n i\u00e7eri\u011finin, aile hayat\u0131 ba\u011flar\u0131n\u0131n ve denetim gerek\u00e7esinin \u00f6nemini g\u00f6stermektedir. Bu nedenle Ankara 26. \u0130dare Mahkemesi karar\u0131, b\u00fct\u00fcn G-87 kay\u0131tlar\u0131n\u0131n iptal edilmesi gerekti\u011fi y\u00f6n\u00fcnde genel bir kural h\u00e2line getirilmemelidir.<\/p>\n<h2><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"G-87_Tahdit_Kodunun_Iptali_Ne_Sonuc_Dogurur\"><\/span>G-87 Tahdit Kodunun \u0130ptali Ne Sonu\u00e7 Do\u011furur?<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n<p>Mahkeme karar\u0131yla dava konusu i\u015flemin iptal edilmesi, yarg\u0131sal denetimde s\u00f6z konusu idari i\u015flemin hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 bulundu\u011funu ifade eder. \u0130ptal karar\u0131n\u0131n idari kay\u0131t ve s\u0131n\u0131r uygulamalar\u0131na yans\u0131t\u0131lmas\u0131 ise karar\u0131n ilgili makamlara ula\u015fmas\u0131n\u0131 ve gere\u011finin yerine getirilmesini gerektiren ayr\u0131 bir uygulama a\u015famas\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p>2577 say\u0131l\u0131 \u0130dari Yarg\u0131lama Usul\u00fc Kanunu&#8217;nun 28. maddesi uyar\u0131nca idareler, mahkeme kararlar\u0131n\u0131n gere\u011fini gecikmeksizin yerine getirmekle y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcd\u00fcr. Bu s\u00fcre, kural olarak karar\u0131n idareye tebli\u011finden ba\u015flayarak <strong>30 g\u00fcn\u00fc ge\u00e7emez.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Ancak somut dosyada giri\u015f yasa\u011f\u0131 kayd\u0131n\u0131n ilgili sistemlerden hangi tarihte \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131na veya ki\u015finin s\u0131n\u0131r kap\u0131s\u0131ndan fiilen giri\u015f yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkin ayr\u0131ca do\u011frulanm\u0131\u015f bir bilgi bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan, <strong>\u201ctahdit sistemden tamamen silindi\u201d<\/strong> ya da <strong>\u201cT\u00fcrkiye\u2019ye giri\u015f kesin olarak sa\u011fland\u0131\u201d<\/strong> \u015feklinde bir sonu\u00e7 \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lmamal\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n<h3><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Bu_Karar_Yabancinin_Turkiyeye_Girisini_Otomatik_Olarak_Saglar_mi\"><\/span>Bu Karar Yabanc\u0131n\u0131n T\u00fcrkiye\u2019ye Giri\u015fini Otomatik Olarak Sa\u011flar m\u0131?<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n<p>\u0130ptal h\u00fckm\u00fc, davaya konu giri\u015f yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n hukuki dayana\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ortadan kald\u0131rmaya y\u00f6neliktir. Bununla birlikte vize ve pasaport \u015fartlar\u0131, ki\u015fiye ili\u015fkin ba\u015fka bir giri\u015f yasa\u011f\u0131 veya farkl\u0131 bir idari kay\u0131t bulunup bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ayr\u0131ca incelenir. Yeni veya ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z bir hukuki engel varsa bu karar onun hakk\u0131nda kendili\u011finden h\u00fck\u00fcm do\u011furmaz.<\/p>\n<h2><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Mahkeme_Karari_Sonrasinda_Idari_Kayitlarin_Guncellenmesi_Neden_Ayri_Bir_Konudur\"><\/span>Mahkeme Karar\u0131 Sonras\u0131nda \u0130dari Kay\u0131tlar\u0131n G\u00fcncellenmesi Neden Ayr\u0131 Bir Konudur?<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n<p>G-87 tahdit kodu ve giri\u015f yasa\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkin iptal h\u00fckm\u00fc verildi\u011finde, hukuk\u00ee karar\u0131n ilgili idarelerin i\u015flem ve bilgi sistemlerine yans\u0131t\u0131lmas\u0131 bak\u0131m\u0131ndan ayr\u0131ca uygulama s\u00fcreci g\u00fcndeme gelir. Mahkemece iptal edilen i\u015flemin hangi tarih ve say\u0131 ile kay\u0131tl\u0131 oldu\u011fu, varsa ayn\u0131 ki\u015fiye ait ba\u015fka tahdit kayd\u0131n\u0131n bulunup bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve s\u0131n\u0131r kap\u0131lar\u0131ndaki verilerin g\u00fcncel durumu bu a\u015famada \u00f6nem ta\u015f\u0131r.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.mevzuat.gov.tr\/MevzuatMetin\/1.5.2577.pdf\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">2577 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun&#8217;un 28. maddesi<\/a>, idarenin mahkeme karar\u0131n\u0131n gere\u011fini yerine getirme y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc d\u00fczenler. Bununla birlikte somut uyu\u015fmazl\u0131kta kayd\u0131n hangi tarihte fiilen terkin edildi\u011fine dair ayr\u0131ca do\u011frulanm\u0131\u015f bilgi bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 i\u00e7in bu makalede ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmi\u015f bir teknik silme tarihi belirtilmemektedir. \u0130ptal karar\u0131 ile pasaport kontrol\u00fcnde b\u00fct\u00fcn ko\u015fullar\u0131n yerine getirilmi\u015f olmas\u0131 ayn\u0131 vak\u0131a de\u011fildir.<\/p>\n<p>Bu ayr\u0131m \u00f6zellikle uzun y\u0131llar boyunca giri\u015f yasa\u011f\u0131yla kar\u015f\u0131la\u015fm\u0131\u015f ki\u015filer a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan \u00f6nemlidir. Ki\u015finin pasaportunun ge\u00e7erli olmas\u0131, vize muafiyetinden yararlan\u0131p yararlanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131, ba\u015fka bir idari engel bulunup bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve idari kay\u0131tlar\u0131n g\u00fcncellenmesi ayr\u0131 sorulard\u0131r. <strong>Somut mahkeme karar\u0131 davaya konu i\u015flemi hedef al\u0131r; ba\u015fka bir idari tasarrufa otomatik olarak h\u00fck\u00fcm kurmaz.<\/strong><\/p>\n<h3><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Giris_Yasagi_ile_Sinir_Disi_Etme_Karari_Ayni_Sey_Degildir\"><\/span>Giri\u015f Yasa\u011f\u0131 ile S\u0131n\u0131r D\u0131\u015f\u0131 Etme Karar\u0131 Ayn\u0131 \u015eey De\u011fildir<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n<p>Yabanc\u0131n\u0131n \u00fclkeye giri\u015finin engellenmesi ile T\u00fcrkiye&#8217;de bulundu\u011fu s\u0131rada s\u0131n\u0131r d\u0131\u015f\u0131 edilmesine karar verilmesi hukuken farkl\u0131 i\u015flemlerdir. \u0130kisi ayn\u0131 ki\u015fi hakk\u0131nda birlikte bulunabilece\u011fi gibi farkl\u0131 zamanlarda da ortaya \u00e7\u0131kabilir. <a href=\"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/sinir-disi-karari\/\">S\u0131n\u0131r d\u0131\u015f\u0131 karar\u0131n\u0131n iptali rehberimiz<\/a>, s\u0131n\u0131r d\u0131\u015f\u0131 i\u015fleminin ayr\u0131 dava s\u00fcrelerini ve hukuki niteli\u011fini inceler. Bu yaz\u0131n\u0131n konusu ise dava dosyas\u0131ndaki <strong>G-87 tahdit kayd\u0131 ve giri\u015f yasa\u011f\u0131d\u0131r.<\/strong><\/p>\n<h2><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Kararin_Diger_Tahdit_Kodu_Davalari_Acisindan_Onemi\"><\/span>Karar\u0131n Di\u011fer Tahdit Kodu Davalar\u0131 A\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan \u00d6nemi<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n<p>Bu dosya, uzun s\u00fcre devam eden bir giri\u015f yasa\u011f\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131lan iptal davas\u0131nda <strong>idari i\u015flemin dayana\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ara\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n<\/strong> ne kadar belirleyici olabilece\u011fini g\u00f6steriyor. G-87 kayd\u0131n\u0131n varl\u0131\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkin bir ekran g\u00f6r\u00fcnt\u00fcs\u00fc veya kurum yaz\u0131s\u0131, tek ba\u015f\u0131na i\u015flemin hangi maddi sebebe dayand\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131klamaya yetmeyebilir.<\/p>\n<p>\u0130dari yarg\u0131da, dava konusu i\u015flemin dayand\u0131\u011f\u0131 olgular ve bu olgular\u0131n hukuki yeterlili\u011fi ara\u015ft\u0131r\u0131labilir. \u00d6zellikle ilk kayd\u0131n \u00e7ok eski tarihli oldu\u011fu, sonraki d\u00f6nemlerde uzatma veya g\u00fcncelleme i\u015flemleri yap\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 uyu\u015fmazl\u0131klarda farkl\u0131 i\u015flemlerin tarih ve dayanaklar\u0131n\u0131n ayr\u0131 ayr\u0131 belirlenmesi gerekir.<\/p>\n<p>Ofisimizce takip edilen bir di\u011fer dosyada Ankara 26. \u0130dare Mahkemesinin <a href=\"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/c-149-tahdit-kodu-iptali-somut-delil-karari\/\">\u00c7-149 tahdit koduna ili\u015fkin iptal karar\u0131<\/a> da somut gerek\u00e7enin yarg\u0131sal denetimdeki rol\u00fcn\u00fc ortaya koymaktad\u0131r. Bununla birlikte \u00c7-149 ve G-87 kay\u0131tlar\u0131 ayn\u0131 idari i\u015flem de\u011fildir; her bir tahdit kodunun hukuki sebebi, i\u015flem tarihi, kapsam\u0131 ve dayanak belgeleri ayr\u0131 ayr\u0131 incelenmelidir.<\/p>\n<h2><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"C-149_ve_V-69_Kararlarindan_Farki_Ayni_Delil_Sorunu_Farkli_Islemler\"><\/span>\u00c7-149 ve V-69 Kararlar\u0131ndan Fark\u0131: Ayn\u0131 Delil Sorunu, Farkl\u0131 \u0130\u015flemler<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n<p>\u0130dari i\u015flemin somut sebebinin ortaya konulmas\u0131 meselesi, yaln\u0131zca G-87 kodunda de\u011fil ba\u015fka yabanc\u0131lar hukuku dosyalar\u0131nda da ortaya \u00e7\u0131kmaktad\u0131r. Bununla birlikte karar incelemelerinde farkl\u0131 tahdit kodlar\u0131n\u0131n tek bir hukuki i\u015flem gibi de\u011ferlendirilmemesi gerekir. Ofisimiz taraf\u0131ndan takip edilen \u00f6rneklerde uyu\u015fmazl\u0131\u011f\u0131n dayand\u0131\u011f\u0131 i\u015flem ve ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclen olgular farkl\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Karar<\/th>\n<th>\u0130darenin ileri s\u00fcrd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc sebep<\/th>\n<th>Mahkemenin belirleyici de\u011ferlendirmesi<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>G-87, Ankara 26. \u0130dare Mahkemesi, E.2025\/3244<\/td>\n<td>Genel g\u00fcvenlik \/ kamu d\u00fczeni gerek\u00e7eli giri\u015f yasa\u011f\u0131 ve uzatma<\/td>\n<td>Somut belge ve istihbari bilgi ortaya konulamad\u0131.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><a href=\"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/c-149-tahdit-kodu-iptali-somut-delil-karari\/\">\u00c7-149, Ankara 26. \u0130dare Mahkemesi, E.2023\/2678<\/a><\/td>\n<td>Kamu d\u00fczeni ve g\u00fcvenli\u011fi bak\u0131m\u0131ndan olumsuz de\u011ferlendirme<\/td>\n<td>Olumsuz de\u011ferlendirmenin somut dayana\u011f\u0131 sunulmad\u0131.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><a href=\"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/tasinmaz-ikamet-izni-iptali-v69-karari\/\">V-69, \u0130stanbul 15. \u0130dare Mahkemesi, E.2022\/1053<\/a><\/td>\n<td>Ta\u015f\u0131nmaz\u0131n \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc ki\u015fiye kiraya verildi\u011fi iddias\u0131 ve ba\u011flant\u0131l\u0131 giri\u015f yasa\u011f\u0131<\/td>\n<td>Kira ili\u015fkisini do\u011frulayan deliller bulunmad\u0131.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p>Bu tablo kararlar\u0131n ba\u011flam\u0131n\u0131 g\u00f6stermeyi ama\u00e7lar; bir karar\u0131n \u00f6b\u00fcr\u00fc hakk\u0131nda h\u00fck\u00fcm do\u011furmas\u0131 s\u00f6z konusu de\u011fildir. Kamu d\u00fczeni gerek\u00e7eli s\u0131n\u0131r d\u0131\u015f\u0131 i\u015flemlerindeki delil denetimini ayr\u0131ca <a href=\"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/kamu-duzeni-gerekceli-sinir-disi-karari-iptali\/\">kamu d\u00fczeni gerek\u00e7eli s\u0131n\u0131r d\u0131\u015f\u0131 karar\u0131n\u0131n iptali<\/a> incelememizde, geri g\u00f6nderilecek \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc \u00fclkenin a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a g\u00f6sterilmesinin gereklili\u011fini ise <a href=\"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/sinir-disi-kararinin-iptali-guvenli-ucuncu-ulke\/\">g\u00fcvenli \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc \u00fclke karar\u0131nda<\/a> ele ald\u0131k.<\/p>\n<h2><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Benzer_Bir_Giris_Yasagi_Dosyasinda_Hangi_Hususlar_Incelenmelidir\"><\/span>Benzer Bir Giri\u015f Yasa\u011f\u0131 Dosyas\u0131nda Hangi Hususlar \u0130ncelenmelidir?<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n<p>Bu karardan hareketle b\u00fct\u00fcn G-87 kay\u0131tlar\u0131n\u0131n hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011funu s\u00f6ylemek m\u00fcmk\u00fcn de\u011fildir. Bir dosyada izlenecek hukuki yolun sa\u011fl\u0131kl\u0131 \u015fekilde belirlenebilmesi i\u00e7in \u00f6zellikle \u015fu konular\u0131n ara\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekir:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Giri\u015f yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ve tahdit kayd\u0131n\u0131n <strong>ilk tesis tarihi<\/strong> ile i\u015flemi yapan makam,<\/li>\n<li>\u0130lk karar\u0131n s\u00fcresi ve varsa <strong>uzatma ya da yenileme i\u015flemleri<\/strong>,<\/li>\n<li>\u0130darece belirtilen kamu d\u00fczeni veya kamu g\u00fcvenli\u011fi gerek\u00e7esinin dayanaklar\u0131,<\/li>\n<li>\u0130lgili ki\u015fi hakk\u0131nda mevcut adli, idari veya istihbari nitelikteki kay\u0131tlar\u0131n kapsam\u0131,<\/li>\n<li>\u0130\u015flemin tebli\u011f veya \u00f6\u011frenilme tarihi ve uygulanabilecek dava s\u00fcresi,<\/li>\n<li>Giri\u015f yasa\u011f\u0131ndan ayr\u0131 bir s\u0131n\u0131r d\u0131\u015f\u0131 karar\u0131, vize engeli veya ba\u015fka tahdit kayd\u0131 bulunup bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131,<\/li>\n<li>\u0130ptal h\u00fckm\u00fc verilmi\u015fse karar\u0131n idarece uygulanma durumu ve g\u00fcncel tahdit kay\u0131tlar\u0131.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Genel de\u011ferlendirme i\u00e7in <a href=\"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/hizmet\/yabancilar-hukuku\/\">yabanc\u0131lar hukuku<\/a> sayfam\u0131zda yer alan ilgili hukuki a\u00e7\u0131klamalardan da yararlan\u0131labilir.<\/p>\n<h2><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Davaci_Vekilinin_Hukuki_Degerlendirmesi_Dosyayi_Onemli_Kilan_Nedir\"><\/span>Davac\u0131 Vekilinin Hukuki De\u011ferlendirmesi: Dosyay\u0131 \u00d6nemli K\u0131lan Nedir?<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n<p>Av. Bat\u0131n Y\u0131lmaz taraf\u0131ndan davac\u0131 vekili s\u0131fat\u0131yla a\u00e7\u0131lan ve takip edilen bu uyu\u015fmazl\u0131kta esas mesele, 2012 y\u0131l\u0131nda olu\u015fturulan G-87 tahdit kayd\u0131n\u0131n y\u0131llar sonra da s\u00fcrd\u00fcr\u00fclmesini hakl\u0131 g\u00f6sterecek <strong>ki\u015fiye \u00f6zg\u00fc maddi sebebin ortaya konulup konulamad\u0131\u011f\u0131d\u0131r.<\/strong> Giri\u015f yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n 15 y\u0131l daha uzat\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n belirtilmesi i\u015flemin sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131 a\u011f\u0131rla\u015ft\u0131rmaktad\u0131r; ancak karar\u0131n ana dayana\u011f\u0131 sadece s\u00fcrenin uzunlu\u011fu de\u011fildir.<\/p>\n<p>Mahkemenin daval\u0131 idareden, Mill\u00ee \u0130stihbarat Te\u015fkil\u00e2t\u0131 Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan ve emniyet birimlerinden kay\u0131t istemesi, dosyadaki iddian\u0131n somutla\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 hedeflemi\u015ftir. \u0130lgili kurumlardan dayanak somut belge sunulmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve istihbari nitelikte bilgi bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 tespitinin ard\u0131ndan iptal h\u00fckm\u00fc kurulmu\u015ftur. Karar\u0131n uygulamaya ili\u015fkin katk\u0131s\u0131, idari i\u015flemin ta\u015f\u0131d\u0131\u011f\u0131 kod ve kategorinin \u00f6tesinde, <strong>her bir ki\u015fi i\u00e7in hangi olgulara dayand\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ara\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fine<\/strong> i\u015faret etmesidir.<\/p>\n<p>Ba\u015fka bir dosyada kayd\u0131n tesis edildi\u011fi tarih, ilgili makam, idari gerek\u00e7e, yabanc\u0131n\u0131n fiil\u00ee durumu, mevcut raporlar ve i\u015fleme kar\u015f\u0131 ba\u015fvuru s\u00fcresi farkl\u0131 olabilir. Bu sebeple bu karar, hukuki analiz bak\u0131m\u0131ndan yararl\u0131 bir \u00f6rnek olmakla birlikte ba\u015fka ki\u015filere do\u011frudan sonu\u00e7 vaat etmez. Ofisimizin <a href=\"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/category\/ornek-kararlar\/\">anonimle\u015ftirilmi\u015f karar incelemeleri<\/a> b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcnde farkl\u0131 idari uyu\u015fmazl\u0131klar\u0131n maddi ve hukuki ayr\u0131mlar\u0131 da yer almaktad\u0131r.<\/p>\n<h2><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Sik_Sorulan_Sorular\"><\/span>S\u0131k Sorulan Sorular<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n<h3><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Ankara_26_Idare_Mahkemesinin_G-87_Dosyasinda_Hangi_Islem_Iptal_Edildi\"><\/span>Ankara 26. \u0130dare Mahkemesinin G-87 Dosyas\u0131nda Hangi \u0130\u015flem \u0130ptal Edildi?<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n<p>Mahkeme, 29.11.2012 tarihli ve 217335 say\u0131l\u0131 G-87 tahdit koduyla ba\u011flant\u0131l\u0131 i\u015flem ile bu yasa\u011f\u0131n 15 y\u0131l uzat\u0131lmas\u0131 ba\u011flam\u0131ndaki dava konusu i\u015flemin iptaline karar verdi. Karar E.2025\/3244, K.2026\/2355 say\u0131l\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n<h3><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Bu_Dosyada_15_Yillik_Yasagin_Kaldirilmasinin_Hukuki_Dayanagi_Neydi\"><\/span>Bu Dosyada 15 Y\u0131ll\u0131k Yasa\u011f\u0131n Kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n Hukuki Dayana\u011f\u0131 Neydi?<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n<p>Mahkeme, davac\u0131 hakk\u0131nda G-87 kayd\u0131n\u0131 destekleyen somut belge veya istihbari bilgi ortaya konulamamas\u0131n\u0131, ayr\u0131ca davac\u0131 hakk\u0131nda adli veya idari i\u015flem bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 birlikte de\u011ferlendirerek dava konusu i\u015flemde hukuka uygunluk g\u00f6rmedi.<\/p>\n<h3><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Ilk_G-87_Giris_Yasagi_2012_Yilinda_mi_Konulmustu\"><\/span>\u0130lk G-87 Giri\u015f Yasa\u011f\u0131 2012 Y\u0131l\u0131nda m\u0131 Konulmu\u015ftu?<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n<p>Evet. Karara g\u00f6re ilk i\u015flem 29.11.2012 tarih ve 217335 say\u0131l\u0131d\u0131r. Davada bu ilk i\u015flem ve daha sonraki 15 y\u0131ll\u0131k uzatma birlikte tart\u0131\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n<h3><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Mahkeme_Hangi_Kurumlardan_Bilgi_ve_Belge_Istedi-2\"><\/span>Mahkeme Hangi Kurumlardan Bilgi ve Belge \u0130stedi?<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n<p>02.04.2026 tarihli ara kararla daval\u0131 idareden, Mill\u00ee \u0130stihbarat Te\u015fkil\u00e2t\u0131 Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan, Emniyet Genel M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc \u0130stihbarat Daire Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan ve Emniyet Genel M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnden tahdit kodunun dayana\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkin somut tespitler istendi.<\/p>\n<h3><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Bu_Kararda_G-87_Icin_Mutlaka_Ceza_Mahkumiyeti_Gerektigi_mi_Soylendi\"><\/span>Bu Kararda G-87 \u0130\u00e7in Mutlaka Ceza Mahk\u00fbmiyeti Gerekti\u011fi mi S\u00f6ylendi?<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n<p>Hay\u0131r. Mahkeme somut davac\u0131n\u0131n hakk\u0131nda adli veya idari i\u015flem bulunmamas\u0131n\u0131, somut belge ve istihbari bilgi yoklu\u011fuyla birlikte de\u011ferlendirdi. Her G-87 i\u015fleminin mutlaka ceza mahk\u00fbmiyetine dayanmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi y\u00f6n\u00fcnde genel bir kural kurmad\u0131.<\/p>\n<h3><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Bes_Yillik_Giris_Yasaginin_15_Yil_Uzatilmasi_ile_Kanundaki_On_Yillik_Ek_Sure_Ayni_Sey_midir\"><\/span>Be\u015f Y\u0131ll\u0131k Giri\u015f Yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n 15 Y\u0131l Uzat\u0131lmas\u0131 ile Kanundaki On Y\u0131ll\u0131k Ek S\u00fcre Ayn\u0131 \u015eey midir?<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n<p>Hay\u0131r. Karar metni 2012 tarihli be\u015f y\u0131ll\u0131k ilk yasa\u011f\u0131n 15 y\u0131l daha uzat\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirtmektedir. 6458 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun\u2019un 9\/3. maddesinde ise be\u015f y\u0131ll\u0131k genel s\u00fcreye, ciddi tehdit h\u00e2linde en fazla on y\u0131l eklenmesi d\u00fczenlenmi\u015ftir. Mahkeme iptal h\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fc yaln\u0131zca s\u00fcre s\u0131n\u0131r\u0131na de\u011fil, somut dayanak bulunmamas\u0131na dayand\u0131rm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.<\/p>\n<h3><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Bu_Kararin_Verilmesi_Giris_Yasagi_Kaydinin_Sistemden_Silindigini_Kanitlar_mi\"><\/span>Bu Karar\u0131n Verilmesi Giri\u015f Yasa\u011f\u0131 Kayd\u0131n\u0131n Sistemden Silindi\u011fini Kan\u0131tlar m\u0131?<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n<p>Karar\u0131n h\u00fck\u00fcm b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcnde dava konusu i\u015flemin iptaline karar verilmi\u015ftir. Ancak kayd\u0131n idari sistemlerde hangi tarihte g\u00fcncellendi\u011fi veya ki\u015finin s\u0131n\u0131r kap\u0131s\u0131ndan fiilen ge\u00e7ti\u011fi karar metninden anla\u015f\u0131lamaz; bunlar ayr\u0131 do\u011frulama gerektiren konulard\u0131r.<\/p>\n<h3><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Bu_Karar_Diger_G-87_Giris_Yasagi_Davalarinda_Kullanilabilir_mi\"><\/span>Bu Karar Di\u011fer G-87 Giri\u015f Yasa\u011f\u0131 Davalar\u0131nda Kullan\u0131labilir mi?<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n<p>Gerek\u00e7esi bak\u0131m\u0131ndan kar\u015f\u0131la\u015ft\u0131rmal\u0131 hukuki de\u011ferlendirmede kullan\u0131labilir. Ancak ba\u015fka yabanc\u0131lar hakk\u0131nda otomatik sonu\u00e7 do\u011furmaz; her i\u015flem kendi tesis tarihi, dayanak kay\u0131tlar\u0131, tebligat ve ba\u015fvuru \u015fartlar\u0131yla birlikte incelenmelidir.<\/p>\n<h2><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Sonuc_Uzun_Suren_Giris_Yasaginin_Dayanagi_Yargisal_Denetimde_Ortaya_Konulamadi\"><\/span>Sonu\u00e7: Uzun S\u00fcren Giri\u015f Yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n Dayana\u011f\u0131 Yarg\u0131sal Denetimde Ortaya Konulamad\u0131<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n<p>Ankara 26. \u0130dare Mahkemesinin 29 Eyl\u00fcl 2026 tarihli karar\u0131, <strong>2012 y\u0131l\u0131nda ba\u015flayan ve daha sonra 15 y\u0131l uzat\u0131lan G-87 tahdit kodlu giri\u015f yasa\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkin \u00f6nemli bir yarg\u0131sal incelemedir.<\/strong> Davac\u0131 vekili Av. Bat\u0131n Y\u0131lmaz taraf\u0131ndan takip edilen davada mahkeme, 2 Nisan 2026 tarihli ara kararla ilgili idare ve g\u00fcvenlik birimlerinden kay\u0131tlar\u0131n dayanaklar\u0131n\u0131 ara\u015ft\u0131rm\u0131\u015f; buna kar\u015f\u0131n somut veya istihbari nitelikte destekleyici bilgiye ula\u015f\u0131lamad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 tespit ederek dava konusu i\u015flemi iptal etmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p>Karar\u0131n temel hukuki mesaj\u0131, idarenin kamu d\u00fczenini ve kamu g\u00fcvenli\u011fini koruma yetkisini ortadan kald\u0131rmak de\u011fildir. <strong>Bu yetkinin ki\u015fiye \u00f6zg\u00fc, yarg\u0131sal denetime elveri\u015fli maddi sebepten ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z \u015fekilde kullan\u0131lamayaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131<\/strong> g\u00f6stermesidir. Dosyada iptal h\u00fckm\u00fc verilmi\u015f olmas\u0131, ba\u015fka bir g\u00f6\u00e7 hukuku i\u015fleminin varl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 veya pasaport ve vize ko\u015fullar\u0131n\u0131 kendili\u011finden ortadan kald\u0131rd\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u015feklinde yorumlanmamal\u0131d\u0131r.<\/p>\n<h2><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Hukuki_Kaynaklar_ve_Ilgili_Incelemeler\"><\/span>Hukuki Kaynaklar ve \u0130lgili \u0130ncelemeler<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n<ul>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.goc.gov.tr\/kurumlar\/goc.gov.tr\/Kanunlar\/YUKK\/YUKK-TURKCE.pdf\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">6458 say\u0131l\u0131 Yabanc\u0131lar ve Uluslararas\u0131 Koruma Kanunu \u2013 G\u00f6\u00e7 \u0130daresi Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 (PDF)<\/a>, \u00f6zellikle m. 9.<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.mevzuat.gov.tr\/MevzuatMetin\/1.5.2577.pdf\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">2577 say\u0131l\u0131 \u0130dari Yarg\u0131lama Usul\u00fc Kanunu \u2013 Resm\u00ee mevzuat metni<\/a>, \u00f6zellikle m. 20, 28, 45 ve 52.<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.anayasa.gov.tr\/tr\/mevzuat\/anayasa\/\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">T\u00fcrkiye Cumhuriyeti Anayasas\u0131 \u2013 Anayasa Mahkemesi<\/a>, \u00f6zellikle m. 16 ve 23.<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/mevzuat.adalet.gov.tr\/ictihat\/1134716900\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">G-87 tahdit koduna ili\u015fkin Dan\u0131\u015ftay i\u00e7tihad\u0131 \u2013 Adalet Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 i\u00e7tihat ar\u015fivi<\/a>.<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/eski--kararlarbilgibankasi.anayasa.gov.tr\/BB\/2018\/36798\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">Anayasa Mahkemesi N.O. ba\u015fvurusu, B. No: 2018\/36798<\/a>.<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/eski--kararlarbilgibankasi.anayasa.gov.tr\/BB\/2018\/29245\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">Anayasa Mahkemesi karar ar\u015fivinde G-87 konulu ba\u015fka bir bireysel ba\u015fvuru<\/a>.<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/g-87-tahdit-kodu-nedir-nasil-kaldirilir-2026-guncel-rehber\/\">G-87 kodu hakk\u0131nda genel bilgi ve dava s\u00fcre\u00e7leri<\/a>.<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/category\/ornek-kararlar\/\">\u00d6rnek mahkeme kararlar\u0131 ve hukuki incelemeler<\/a>.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h2><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Yazar_ve_Hukuki_Bilgilendirme\"><\/span>Yazar ve Hukuki Bilgilendirme<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n<p><strong>Av. Bat\u0131n YILMAZ<\/strong><br \/>\n\u0130stanbul Barosu \u2013 Sicil No: 77008<\/p>\n<p>Bu metin, Ankara 26. \u0130dare Mahkemesinin 29.09.2026 tarihli, E.2025\/3244, K.2026\/2355 say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131na dayal\u0131 hukuki karar incelemesidir. Taraflar\u0131n ki\u015fisel bilgileri yay\u0131mlanmam\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. \u0130nceleme, dosyada saptanan olgular ve karar\u0131n gerek\u00e7esiyle s\u0131n\u0131rl\u0131d\u0131r; ba\u015fka dosyalarda ayn\u0131 sonucun elde edilece\u011fi anlam\u0131na gelmez.<\/p>\n<\/article>\n<p><!-- FAQPage JSON-LD --><\/p>\n<p><script type=\"application\/ld+json\">\n{\n  \"@context\": \"https:\/\/schema.org\",\n  \"@type\": \"FAQPage\",\n  \"mainEntity\": [\n    {\n      \"@type\": \"Question\",\n      \"name\": \"Ankara 26. \u0130dare Mahkemesinin G-87 dosyas\u0131nda hangi i\u015flem iptal edildi?\",\n      \"acceptedAnswer\": {\n        \"@type\": \"Answer\",\n        \"text\": \"Mahkeme, 29.11.2012 tarihli ve 217335 say\u0131l\u0131 G-87 tahdit koduyla ba\u011flant\u0131l\u0131 i\u015flem ile bu yasa\u011f\u0131n 15 y\u0131l uzat\u0131lmas\u0131 ba\u011flam\u0131ndaki dava konusu i\u015flemin iptaline karar verdi. Karar E.2025\/3244, K.2026\/2355 say\u0131l\u0131d\u0131r.\"\n      }\n    },\n    {\n      \"@type\": \"Question\",\n      \"name\": \"Bu dosyada 15 y\u0131ll\u0131k yasa\u011f\u0131n kald\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n hukuki dayana\u011f\u0131 neydi?\",\n      \"acceptedAnswer\": {\n        \"@type\": \"Answer\",\n        \"text\": \"Mahkeme, davac\u0131 hakk\u0131nda G-87 kayd\u0131n\u0131 destekleyen somut belge veya istihbari bilgi ortaya konulamamas\u0131n\u0131, ayr\u0131ca davac\u0131 hakk\u0131nda adli veya idari i\u015flem bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 birlikte de\u011ferlendirerek dava konusu i\u015flemde hukuka uygunluk g\u00f6rmedi.\"\n      }\n    },\n    {\n      \"@type\": \"Question\",\n      \"name\": \"\u0130lk G-87 giri\u015f yasa\u011f\u0131 2012 y\u0131l\u0131nda m\u0131 konulmu\u015ftu?\",\n      \"acceptedAnswer\": {\n        \"@type\": \"Answer\",\n        \"text\": \"Evet. Karara g\u00f6re ilk i\u015flem 29.11.2012 tarih ve 217335 say\u0131l\u0131d\u0131r. Davada bu ilk i\u015flem ve daha sonraki 15 y\u0131ll\u0131k uzatma birlikte tart\u0131\u015f\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.\"\n      }\n    },\n    {\n      \"@type\": \"Question\",\n      \"name\": \"Mahkeme hangi kurumlardan bilgi ve belge istedi?\",\n      \"acceptedAnswer\": {\n        \"@type\": \"Answer\",\n        \"text\": \"02.04.2026 tarihli ara kararla daval\u0131 idareden, Mill\u00ee \u0130stihbarat Te\u015fkil\u00e2t\u0131 Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan, Emniyet Genel M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc \u0130stihbarat Daire Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan ve Emniyet Genel M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcnden tahdit kodunun dayana\u011f\u0131na ili\u015fkin somut tespitler istendi.\"\n      }\n    },\n    {\n      \"@type\": \"Question\",\n      \"name\": \"Bu kararda G-87 i\u00e7in mutlaka ceza mahk\u00fbmiyeti gerekti\u011fi mi s\u00f6ylendi?\",\n      \"acceptedAnswer\": {\n        \"@type\": \"Answer\",\n        \"text\": \"Hay\u0131r. Mahkeme somut davac\u0131n\u0131n hakk\u0131nda adli veya idari i\u015flem bulunmamas\u0131n\u0131, somut belge ve istihbari bilgi yoklu\u011fuyla birlikte de\u011ferlendirdi. Her G-87 i\u015fleminin mutlaka ceza mahk\u00fbmiyetine dayanmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fi y\u00f6n\u00fcnde genel bir kural kurmad\u0131.\"\n      }\n    },\n    {\n      \"@type\": \"Question\",\n      \"name\": \"Be\u015f y\u0131ll\u0131k giri\u015f yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131n 15 y\u0131l uzat\u0131lmas\u0131 ile kanundaki on y\u0131ll\u0131k ek s\u00fcre ayn\u0131 \u015fey midir?\",\n      \"acceptedAnswer\": {\n        \"@type\": \"Answer\",\n        \"text\": \"Hay\u0131r. Karar metni 2012 tarihli be\u015f y\u0131ll\u0131k ilk yasa\u011f\u0131n 15 y\u0131l daha uzat\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirtmektedir. 6458 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun\u2019un 9\/3. maddesinde ise be\u015f y\u0131ll\u0131k genel s\u00fcreye, ciddi tehdit h\u00e2linde en fazla on y\u0131l eklenmesi d\u00fczenlenmi\u015ftir. Mahkeme iptal h\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fc yaln\u0131zca s\u00fcre s\u0131n\u0131r\u0131na de\u011fil, somut dayanak bulunmamas\u0131na dayand\u0131rm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r.\"\n      }\n    },\n    {\n      \"@type\": \"Question\",\n      \"name\": \"Bu karar\u0131n verilmesi giri\u015f yasa\u011f\u0131 kayd\u0131n\u0131n sistemden silindi\u011fini kan\u0131tlar m\u0131?\",\n      \"acceptedAnswer\": {\n        \"@type\": \"Answer\",\n        \"text\": \"Karar\u0131n h\u00fck\u00fcm b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcnde dava konusu i\u015flemin iptaline karar verilmi\u015ftir. Ancak kayd\u0131n idari sistemlerde hangi tarihte g\u00fcncellendi\u011fi veya ki\u015finin s\u0131n\u0131r kap\u0131s\u0131ndan fiilen ge\u00e7ti\u011fi karar metninden anla\u015f\u0131lamaz; bunlar ayr\u0131 do\u011frulama gerektiren konulard\u0131r.\"\n      }\n    },\n    {\n      \"@type\": \"Question\",\n      \"name\": \"Bu karar di\u011fer G-87 giri\u015f yasa\u011f\u0131 davalar\u0131nda kullan\u0131labilir mi?\",\n      \"acceptedAnswer\": {\n        \"@type\": \"Answer\",\n        \"text\": \"Gerek\u00e7esi bak\u0131m\u0131ndan kar\u015f\u0131la\u015ft\u0131rmal\u0131 hukuki de\u011ferlendirmede kullan\u0131labilir. Ancak ba\u015fka yabanc\u0131lar hakk\u0131nda otomatik sonu\u00e7 do\u011furmaz; her i\u015flem kendi tesis tarihi, dayanak kay\u0131tlar\u0131, tebligat ve ba\u015fvuru \u015fartlar\u0131yla birlikte incelenmelidir.\"\n      }\n    }\n  ]\n}\n<\/script><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Ankara 26. \u0130dare Mahkemesi, 2012 y\u0131l\u0131nda hakk\u0131nda be\u015f y\u0131l s\u00fcreli G-87 tahdit kodu olu\u015fturulan ve T\u00fcrkiye\u2019ye giri\u015f yasa\u011f\u0131 daha sonra 15 y\u0131l uzat\u0131lan yabanc\u0131 hakk\u0131nda tesis edilen i\u015flemi iptal etti. 29 Eyl\u00fcl 2026 tarihli karar\u0131n belirleyici gerek\u00e7esi, kamu d\u00fczeni ve kamu g\u00fcvenli\u011fi bak\u0131m\u0131ndan ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclen tehdidi destekleyen somut bir bilgi veya belgenin, hatta istihbari nitelikte [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_joinchat":[],"footnotes":""},"categories":[449],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3819","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-ornek-kararlar"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3819","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3819"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3819\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3820,"href":"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3819\/revisions\/3820"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3819"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3819"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3819"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}