{"id":3437,"date":"2026-09-14T08:52:40","date_gmt":"2026-09-14T05:52:40","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/?p=3437"},"modified":"2026-09-17T21:53:03","modified_gmt":"2026-09-17T18:53:03","slug":"evlenme-yoluyla-vatandaslik-reddi","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/evlenme-yoluyla-vatandaslik-reddi\/","title":{"rendered":"Annulment Ruling Regarding the Rejection of Citizenship by Marriage Due to Absence of Concrete Evidence"},"content":{"rendered":"<div id=\"ez-toc-container\" class=\"ez-toc-v2_0_88 counter-hierarchy ez-toc-counter ez-toc-grey ez-toc-container-direction\">\n<div class=\"ez-toc-title-container\">\n<p class=\"ez-toc-title\" style=\"cursor:inherit\">Ba\u015fl\u0131klar<\/p>\n<span class=\"ez-toc-title-toggle\"><a href=\"#\" class=\"ez-toc-pull-right ez-toc-btn ez-toc-btn-xs ez-toc-btn-default ez-toc-toggle\" aria-label=\"Toggle Table of Content\"><span class=\"ez-toc-js-icon-con\"><span class=\"\"><span class=\"eztoc-hide\" style=\"display:none;\">Toggle<\/span><span class=\"ez-toc-icon-toggle-span\"><svg style=\"fill: #999;color:#999\" xmlns=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg\" class=\"list-377408\" width=\"20px\" height=\"20px\" viewbox=\"0 0 24 24\" fill=\"none\"><path d=\"M6 6H4v2h2V6zm14 0H8v2h12V6zM4 11h2v2H4v-2zm16 0H8v2h12v-2zM4 16h2v2H4v-2zm16 0H8v2h12v-2z\" fill=\"currentColor\"><\/path><\/svg><svg style=\"fill: #999;color:#999\" class=\"arrow-unsorted-368013\" xmlns=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg\" width=\"10px\" height=\"10px\" viewbox=\"0 0 24 24\" version=\"1.2\" baseprofile=\"tiny\"><path d=\"M18.2 9.3l-6.2-6.3-6.2 6.3c-.2.2-.3.4-.3.7s.1.5.3.7c.2.2.4.3.7.3h11c.3 0 .5-.1.7-.3.2-.2.3-.5.3-.7s-.1-.5-.3-.7zM5.8 14.7l6.2 6.3 6.2-6.3c.2-.2.3-.5.3-.7s-.1-.5-.3-.7c-.2-.2-.4-.3-.7-.3h-11c-.3 0-.5.1-.7.3-.2.2-.3.5-.3.7s.1.5.3.7z\"\/><\/svg><\/span><\/span><\/span><\/a><\/span><\/div>\n<nav><ul class='ez-toc-list ez-toc-list-level-1' ><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-1\" href=\"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/evlenme-yoluyla-vatandaslik-reddi\/#Kararin_Kisa_Ozeti\" >Brief Summary of the Decision<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-2\" href=\"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/evlenme-yoluyla-vatandaslik-reddi\/#Uyusmazlik_Nasil_Ortaya_Cikti\" >How Did the Dispute Arise?<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-3\" href=\"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/evlenme-yoluyla-vatandaslik-reddi\/#Evlenme_Yoluyla_Turk_Vatandasligi_Otomatik_Olarak_Kazanilir_mi\" >Is Turkish Citizenship Acquired Automatically Through Marriage?<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-4\" href=\"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/evlenme-yoluyla-vatandaslik-reddi\/#Vatandaslik_Basvurusunda_Idarenin_Takdir_Yetkisi_Sinirsiz_midir\" >Is the Administration's Discretionary Power in Citizenship Applications Unlimited?<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-5\" href=\"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/evlenme-yoluyla-vatandaslik-reddi\/#Birinci_Ret_Gerekcesi_Sosyal_Medya_Paylasimina_Iliskin_Ihbar\" >First Grounds for Rejection: Denunciation Regarding Social Media Posts<\/a><ul class='ez-toc-list-level-3' ><li class='ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-6\" href=\"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/evlenme-yoluyla-vatandaslik-reddi\/#Ceza_sorusturmasinin_ilerletilmemesi_idareyi_her_durumda_baglar_mi\" >Does the discontinuation of a criminal investigation bind the administration in every case?<\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-7\" href=\"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/evlenme-yoluyla-vatandaslik-reddi\/#Ikinci_Ret_Gerekcesi_Turk_Vatandasi_Es_Hakkindaki_Istihbari_Degerlendirme\" >Second Grounds for Rejection: Intelligence Assessment Regarding the Turkish Citizen Spouse<\/a><ul class='ez-toc-list-level-3' ><li class='ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-8\" href=\"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/evlenme-yoluyla-vatandaslik-reddi\/#Es_hakkindaki_bilgi_basvuru_sahibine_karsi_kullanilabilir_mi\" >Can information concerning the spouse be used against the applicant?<\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-9\" href=\"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/evlenme-yoluyla-vatandaslik-reddi\/#Dosyadaki_Olumlu_Tespitler_Nelerdi\" >What Were the Favorable Findings in the Case File?<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-10\" href=\"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/evlenme-yoluyla-vatandaslik-reddi\/#Ankara_12_Idare_Mahkemesinin_Iptal_Gerekcesi\" >Grounds for Annulment by the Ankara 12th Administrative Court<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-11\" href=\"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/evlenme-yoluyla-vatandaslik-reddi\/#Karar_Ne_Anlama_Geliyor_Ne_Anlama_Gelmiyor\" >What the Judgment Means and Does Not Mean<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-12\" href=\"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/evlenme-yoluyla-vatandaslik-reddi\/#Vatandaslik_Basvurusunun_Reddi_ile_Vatandasligin_Iptali_Ayni_Sey_midir\" >Are the Rejection of a Citizenship Application and the Revocation of Citizenship the Same Thing?<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-13\" href=\"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/evlenme-yoluyla-vatandaslik-reddi\/#Benzer_Bir_Ret_Isleminde_Hangi_Belgeler_Incelenmelidir\" >Which Documents Should Be Examined in Similar Rejection Proceedings?<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-14\" href=\"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/evlenme-yoluyla-vatandaslik-reddi\/#Ret_Gerekcesi_Dava_Acilmadan_Once_Nasil_Analiz_Edilmelidir\" >How Should the Grounds for Rejection Be Analyzed Before Filing a Lawsuit?<\/a><ul class='ez-toc-list-level-3' ><li class='ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-15\" href=\"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/evlenme-yoluyla-vatandaslik-reddi\/#Dosyadaki_olumlu_ve_olumsuz_veriler_karsilastirilmalidir\" >The positive and negative data in the file must be compared.<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-16\" href=\"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/evlenme-yoluyla-vatandaslik-reddi\/#Islem_tarihi_ile_dava_tarihindeki_durum_ayrilmalidir\" >The situation as of the date of the administrative act and the date of the lawsuit must be distinguished.<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-17\" href=\"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/evlenme-yoluyla-vatandaslik-reddi\/#Gizli_veya_istihbari_bilgi_karsisinda_yargisal_denetim_istenmelidir\" >Judicial review must be requested in the face of confidential or intelligence information.<\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-18\" href=\"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/evlenme-yoluyla-vatandaslik-reddi\/#Evlenme_Yoluyla_Vatandaslik_Diger_Kazanma_Yollarindan_Nasil_Ayrilir\" >How Does Citizenship by Marriage Differ from Other Modes of Acquisition?<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-19\" href=\"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/evlenme-yoluyla-vatandaslik-reddi\/#Evlenme_Yoluyla_Vatandaslik_Reddi_Davasinda_Sure_ve_Gorevli_Mahkeme\" >Statute of Limitations and Competent Court in Lawsuits Regarding the Rejection of Citizenship by Marriage<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-20\" href=\"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/evlenme-yoluyla-vatandaslik-reddi\/#Mahkemenin_Hukmu_ve_Kanun_Yolu\" >Judgment of the Court and Legal Remedies<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-21\" href=\"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/evlenme-yoluyla-vatandaslik-reddi\/#Sik_Sorulan_Sorular\" >Frequently Asked Questions<\/a><ul class='ez-toc-list-level-3' ><li class='ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-22\" href=\"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/evlenme-yoluyla-vatandaslik-reddi\/#Turk_vatandasiyla_uc_yil_evli_olan_yabanci_kesin_olarak_vatandaslik_kazanir_mi\" >Does a foreigner married to a Turkish citizen for three years acquire citizenship definitively?<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-23\" href=\"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/evlenme-yoluyla-vatandaslik-reddi\/#Milli_guvenlik_gerekcesiyle_verilen_her_ret_karari_iptal_edilir_mi\" >Is every rejection decision rendered on the grounds of national security annulled?<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-24\" href=\"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/evlenme-yoluyla-vatandaslik-reddi\/#Takipsizlik_karari_vatandaslik_reddini_kendiliginden_hukuka_aykiri_yapar_mi\" >Does a decision of non-prosecution automatically render the rejection of citizenship unlawful?<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-25\" href=\"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/evlenme-yoluyla-vatandaslik-reddi\/#Iptal_karari_dogrudan_vatandaslik_kazandirir_mi\" >Does the annulment decision directly grant citizenship?<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-26\" href=\"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/evlenme-yoluyla-vatandaslik-reddi\/#Es_hakkindaki_olumsuz_kayit_yabanci_esin_basvurusunu_etkiler_mi\" >Does a negative record concerning the spouse affect the foreign spouse's application?<\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-27\" href=\"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/evlenme-yoluyla-vatandaslik-reddi\/#Sonuc\" >Conclusion<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-28\" href=\"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/evlenme-yoluyla-vatandaslik-reddi\/#Kararin_Anonimlestirilmis_Tam_Metni\" >Full Anonymized Text of the Decision<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-29\" href=\"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/evlenme-yoluyla-vatandaslik-reddi\/#Yazar_Bilgisi\" >Author Information<\/a><ul class='ez-toc-list-level-3' ><li class='ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-30\" href=\"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/evlenme-yoluyla-vatandaslik-reddi\/#TBB_Meslek_Kurallari_ve_Reklam_Yasagina_Uyum_Ibaresi\" >Compliance Statement with TBB Professional Rules and Advertising Prohibition<\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-31\" href=\"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/evlenme-yoluyla-vatandaslik-reddi\/#Iletisim_ve_Hukuki_Bilgilendirme\" >Communication and Legal Information<\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/nav><\/div>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Rejection of citizenship by marriage<\/strong>, may not be deemed lawful if the administration relies solely on a general and abstract assessment of \"national security and public order.\" The Ankara 12th Administrative Court annulled the rejection decision in a dispute where the marital union was genuine, the citizenship commission issued a favorable opinion, and the negative allegations against the applicant were not supported by concrete documents. However, this decision does not mean that marriage automatically confers Turkish citizenship or that everyone meeting the application requirements must obligatorily be granted citizenship.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The lawsuit examined in this article was filed and pursued in the capacity of plaintiff's counsel by <strong>Atty. Bat\u0131n Y\u0131lmaz<\/strong> was filed and pursued by. The review has been prepared based on the anonymized judgment text, the Turkish Citizenship Law No. 5901, and relevant secondary legislation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Kararin_Kisa_Ozeti\"><\/span>Brief Summary of the Decision<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table\"><table><tbody><tr><th>Court<\/th><td>Ankara 12th Administrative Court<\/td><\/tr><tr><th>Case file number<\/th><td>2023\/1014<\/td><\/tr><tr><th>Decision number<\/th><td>2024\/629<\/td><\/tr><tr><th>Decision date<\/th><td>April 5, 2024<\/td><\/tr><tr><th>Subject of the lawsuit<\/th><td>Annulment of the decision regarding the rejection of the application for Turkish citizenship by marriage<\/td><\/tr><tr><th>Core dispute<\/th><td>Whether the grounds of national security and public order are supported by concrete and reviewable information<\/td><\/tr><tr><th>Conclusion<\/th><td>Annulment of the rejection decision subject to the lawsuit<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The court did not eliminate the discretionary power granted to the administration regarding citizenship; rather, it reviewed the specific data upon which this power was exercised in the concrete case. It was concluded that, notwithstanding the favorable marriage investigation report in the file, the grounds for denial were not presented with sufficient concreteness.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Uyusmazlik_Nasil_Ortaya_Cikti\"><\/span>How Did the Dispute Arise?<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The applicant applied to acquire Turkish citizenship pursuant to Article 16 of Law No. 5901, based on their marriage to a Turkish citizen, which has lasted for more than three years. During the police investigation, interview, and commission evaluation in the application process, findings were established indicating that the spouses live together as a family union, the marriage continues in the ordinary course, and no situation incompatible with the marital union was identified.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Despite this, the Ministry of Interior rejected the application by its transaction dated May 9, 2023, and numbered 2023\/383. The rejection transaction was based on a past social media tip-off concerning the applicant and intelligence assessments indicating that the Turkish citizen spouse might pose a hazard in terms of national security and public order.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The applicant filed an annulment action, asserting that their marriage is genuine, the family union continues, no negativity was identified during the investigation and interview, the tip-off concerning them was not of a nature to require the continuation of a criminal investigation, and the assessment regarding the spouse was not based on any concrete document.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Evlenme_Yoluyla_Turk_Vatandasligi_Otomatik_Olarak_Kazanilir_mi\"><\/span>Is Turkish Citizenship Acquired Automatically Through Marriage?<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">No. Marrying a Turkish citizen does not automatically grant Turkish citizenship to the foreign spouse. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.mevzuat.gov.tr\/MevzuatMetin\/1.5.5901.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Article 31 of the Turkish Citizenship Law No. 5901<\/a> Pursuant to Article 16, a foreigner who has been married to a Turkish citizen for at least three years and whose marriage continues only acquires the right to apply. The General Directorate of Civil Registration and Nationality <a href=\"https:\/\/www.nvi.gov.tr\/turk-vatandasliginin-kazanilmasi\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">regarding the acquisition of Turkish citizenship<\/a> also explicitly states that marriage does not directly confer citizenship.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table\"><table><thead><tr><th>Legal requirement<\/th><th>Subject of the review<\/th><\/tr><\/thead><tbody><tr><td>Being married for at least three years and the continuation of the marriage<\/td><td>Duration and marital status as of the application date<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Living within a family union<\/td><td>The reality of shared life and the marital relationship<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Refraining from activities incompatible with the marital union<\/td><td>The purpose of the marriage and the conduct of the applicant<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Not posing an impediment in terms of national security and public order<\/td><td>Security and public order data concerning the applicant<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Details regarding the application procedure, interview, and investigation <a href=\"https:\/\/www.resmigazete.gov.tr\/eskiler\/2010\/04\/20100406-11.htm\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Regulation on the Implementation of the Turkish Citizenship Law<\/a> is regulated under. Current legislation links can also be checked via the pages of the Directorate General of Population and Citizenship Affairs <a href=\"https:\/\/www.nvi.gov.tr\/kanunlar\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">laws<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.nvi.gov.tr\/yonetmelikler\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">regulations<\/a> can be checked from the pages.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Vatandaslik_Basvurusunda_Idarenin_Takdir_Yetkisi_Sinirsiz_midir\"><\/span>Is the Administration's Discretionary Power in Citizenship Applications Unlimited?<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Article 10 of Law No. 5901 stipulates that fulfilling the statutory requirements does not grant the applicant an absolute right to acquire citizenship. Therefore, the court does not make an assessment to the effect that \"if the conditions are met, the administration must grant citizenship.\" The decision to naturalize is subject to the discretion of the competent authority.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">However, discretionary power is not the freedom to make arbitrary decisions. The grounds for the administrative act must be real, the justification must be correlated with the file, and it must be subject to judicial review. A statement such as \"it was assessed that it may be objectionable,\" which merely states the outcome without showing how that conclusion was reached, may not be deemed sufficient on its own depending on the specific circumstances of the case.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">For individuals facing the rejection of their citizenship application regarding the general legal framework, litigation period, and remedies <a href=\"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/turk-vatandaslik-basvurusunun-reddi\/\">Rejection of Turkish citizenship application<\/a> Our guide on the subject may also be reviewed.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Birinci_Ret_Gerekcesi_Sosyal_Medya_Paylasimina_Iliskin_Ihbar\"><\/span>First Grounds for Rejection: Denunciation Regarding Social Media Posts<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">One of the grounds relied upon by the administration is the notice record created concerning the applicant due to social media posts. The allegation was associated with the claim of publicly degrading the Turkish nation and the Republic of Turkey. However, upon the prosecutor's evaluation, it was concluded that the posts constituted subjective comments directed at individuals who did not comply with pandemic rules, and that there were no derogatory statements directed at the Turkish nation as a whole. Therefore, considering that there was no post containing constitutive elements of a crime, it was deemed unnecessary to continue the criminal investigation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Ceza_sorusturmasinin_ilerletilmemesi_idareyi_her_durumda_baglar_mi\"><\/span>Does the discontinuation of a criminal investigation bind the administration in every case?<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">No. The objectives and standards of proof in criminal law and administrative law are not identical. An administrative authority may evaluate legally relevant and reliable data regarding national security or public order, even in the absence of a criminal conviction. Therefore, the fact that the investigation was not pursued should not be interpreted as an absolute rule requiring the administration to completely disregard the relevant incident in every citizenship file.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">What was decisive in the specific decision, in addition to the prosecutor's evaluation, is that no other concrete information was presented to show that the applicant constitutes an obstacle in terms of public order. In other words, rather than relying solely on the outcome of the criminal file, the court examined all the data in the citizenship file together.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Ikinci_Ret_Gerekcesi_Turk_Vatandasi_Es_Hakkindaki_Istihbari_Degerlendirme\"><\/span>Second Grounds for Rejection: Intelligence Assessment Regarding the Turkish Citizen Spouse<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The second element in the rejection procedure is the intelligence information suggesting that the Turkish citizen spouse may pose a risk in terms of national security and public order. The court requested concrete findings and documents supporting this evaluation from the administration through its interim decisions. The decision stated that, despite the interim decisions dated November 15, 2023, December 19, 2023, and February 20, 2024, sufficient documents demonstrating the basis of the alleged risk were not submitted to the case file.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Es_hakkindaki_bilgi_basvuru_sahibine_karsi_kullanilabilir_mi\"><\/span>Can information concerning the spouse be used against the applicant?<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">When conducting family unity and security evaluations during a citizenship application, certain information regarding the spouse may be relevant depending on the nature of the dispute. However, for a record concerning the spouse to produce adverse consequences for the applicant, the content, currency, reliability of the information, and its connection to the application must be explained. Transmitting merely an abstract opinion regarding the spouse, without evaluating the individual situation of the applicant, undermines judicial review.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">In this case, the court did not categorically dismiss the existence of intelligence information as legally worthless. The focal point of the decision is that the administration failed to support the alleged risk with the degree of concreteness that the court could examine, and that this abstract evaluation was not explained together with the positive findings in the file.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Dosyadaki_Olumlu_Tespitler_Nelerdi\"><\/span>What Were the Favorable Findings in the Case File?<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>The completion of the three-year marriage period required for marriage as of the application date and the continuation of the marriage,<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>The determination that the spouses live within a family union,<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>The existence of a law enforcement evaluation indicating that the marriage is a normal and genuine marriage,<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>The absence of any activity inconsistent with the marital union,<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>The absence of any other adverse record in the security investigation regarding the applicant,<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>The Citizenship Review and Investigation Commission issuing a favorable opinion.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">These findings do not solely make the grant of citizenship mandatory. However, if the administration reaches a different conclusion from these, the opposing data resulting in the refusal must be set forth with sufficient clarity. In the decision, it was evaluated that the grounds for the adverse decision were not substantiated in the face of the favorable field research and commission opinion.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Ankara_12_Idare_Mahkemesinin_Iptal_Gerekcesi\"><\/span>Grounds for Annulment by the Ankara 12th Administrative Court<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The Court based its decision on the file findings regarding the applicant's meeting the conditions set forth in Article 16 of Law No. 5901. It evaluated together the prosecutor's assessment that the posts subject to the social media tip-off contained no criminal elements and the lack of concrete documentary support for the security concern alleged against the spouse.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">At the end of this holistic review, it was concluded that the refusal procedure established on the grounds of national security and public order did not comply with the law and equity. Thus, the Ministry of Interior's refusal procedure dated May 9, 2023, was annulled.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Karar_Ne_Anlama_Geliyor_Ne_Anlama_Gelmiyor\"><\/span>What the Judgment Means and Does Not Mean<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table\"><table><thead><tr><th>The implication of the decision<\/th><th>Conclusion that should not be drawn from the decision<\/th><\/tr><\/thead><tbody><tr><td>Refusal procedures based on discretionary power are subject to judicial review.<\/td><td>The Court did not state that the administration lacks discretionary power in the field of citizenship.<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Abstract security statements may be deemed insufficient in a specific case.<\/td><td>It has not been accepted that every piece of intelligence is invalid.<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>The favorable and unfavorable data in the file must be evaluated together.<\/td><td>It has not been stated that a favorable commission opinion automatically grants citizenship.<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>The rejection procedure has been annulled.<\/td><td>The court has not directly granted Turkish citizenship.<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>The decision is based on the specific characteristics of the case file.<\/td><td>It is not a binding precedent that produces automatic results in other cases.<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Upon the annulment decision, the administration must render a new transaction by taking into account the reasoning of the court decision. The scope of the reassessment, the finalization status of the decision, subsequently emerging information in the file, and the potential review by the appellate court must also be taken into consideration.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Vatandaslik_Basvurusunun_Reddi_ile_Vatandasligin_Iptali_Ayni_Sey_midir\"><\/span>Are the Rejection of a Citizenship Application and the Revocation of Citizenship the Same Thing?<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">No. The transaction examined in this lawsuit is the rejection of the application of a person who has not yet acquired Turkish citizenship. The revocation or annulment of a decision rendered after the acquisition of citizenship, or the deprivation of citizenship, is subject to different conditions and legal consequences. Regarding this distinction, <a href=\"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/turk-vatandasligi-iptali\/\">Annulment of Turkish citizenship and revocation of administrative acts<\/a> information can be obtained from our article titled.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Benzer_Bir_Ret_Isleminde_Hangi_Belgeler_Incelenmelidir\"><\/span>Which Documents Should Be Examined in Similar Rejection Proceedings?<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<ol class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>The application document indicating which statutory provision the application is based on,<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>The service document and date of service for the rejection decision,<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>The clear justification for the rejection or the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) response regarding the justification,<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>The citizenship interview form and the commission's opinion,<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Marriage and address investigation documents prepared by law enforcement,<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Joint residence, lease, utility bill, and similar records demonstrating family unity,<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>The current outcome of the criminal investigation or prosecution cited as the basis,<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Documents, if any, explaining the connection between the individual and the circumstance in the security evaluation,<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Petitions previously submitted to the administration and the responses provided.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Not all documents may be present in every file. In particular, it is possible that classified information and documents may not be fully accessible at the application stage. In such cases, the court may request the necessary information and documents from the administration via an interim decision. For other types of lawsuits in foreigners' and citizenship law, <a href=\"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/hizmet\/yabancilar-hukuku\/\">on our immigration and aliens law services page<\/a> the subject matter map can be reviewed.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Ret_Gerekcesi_Dava_Acilmadan_Once_Nasil_Analiz_Edilmelidir\"><\/span>How Should the Grounds for Rejection Be Analyzed Before Filing a Lawsuit?<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">It is possible to encounter brief or general justifications in citizenship rejection decisions. In such cases, merely reiterating that the applicant meets the legal requirements often does not constitute sufficient preparation for a lawsuit. First, it must be determined upon which factual circumstance the administrative action is based, how this circumstance is linked to the applicant, and why the positive findings in the file were deemed insufficient.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Dosyadaki_olumlu_ve_olumsuz_veriler_karsilastirilmalidir\"><\/span>The positive and negative data in the file must be compared.<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">In the specific case, although the law enforcement investigation, the determination of family unity, and the commission's opinion were favorable, two negative elements were used as the justification for rejection. The court addressed these elements independently of each other, examining whether the social media denunciation was evaluated by the prosecutor's office and whether the intelligence assessment regarding the spouse was supported by documentation. In similar lawsuits as well, the explanation and documentation specific to each ground for rejection must be evaluated separately.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Islem_tarihi_ile_dava_tarihindeki_durum_ayrilmalidir\"><\/span>The situation as of the date of the administrative act and the date of the lawsuit must be distinguished.<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">In an action for annulment, lawfulness is, as a rule, reviewed based on the conditions existing at the date when the administrative act was issued. Therefore, just as a document obtained subsequently is important, so is the information in the possession of the administration at the date of rejection. Even if subsequent documents may clarify certain facts, the factual and legal framework at the date of the act must be properly established in the petition.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Gizli_veya_istihbari_bilgi_karsisinda_yargisal_denetim_istenmelidir\"><\/span>Judicial review must be requested in the face of confidential or intelligence information.<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The applicant may not always know the content of their security record. This situation neither requires the claim to be accepted outright nor justifies the presumption that it does not exist. In the statement of claim, the court may be requested to order the administration to submit the underlying documents, to examine the information in terms of its currency and connection to the individual, and to review whether it is of sufficient gravity to justify the rejection. In the case at hand, the court's request for documents through three separate interim orders demonstrates the importance of uncovering the material grounds.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Evlenme_Yoluyla_Vatandaslik_Diger_Kazanma_Yollarindan_Nasil_Ayrilir\"><\/span>How Does Citizenship by Marriage Differ from Other Modes of Acquisition?<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">An application based on marriage has different conditions than the acquisition of citizenship through general or exceptional pathways. The core of this application consists of an ongoing marriage of at least three years, a genuine family unity, and the absence of activities incompatible with marriage. In exceptional citizenship through investment, however, a different administrative procedure is carried out based on specific types and amounts of investment. The conditions of these two processes cannot be used interchangeably. Regarding the scope of the exceptional method, <a href=\"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/turkiyede-yatirim-yoluyla-vatandaslik\/\">Citizenship by investment in Turkey<\/a> our guide may be reviewed.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Accurately determining the type of application alters the documents to be submitted, the investigation to be conducted, and the legal grounds to be asserted in the event of a dispute. Therefore, it is not correct to apply a court decision regarding an application made through marriage to another method of acquiring citizenship with all of its consequences.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Evlenme_Yoluyla_Vatandaslik_Reddi_Davasinda_Sure_ve_Gorevli_Mahkeme\"><\/span>Statute of Limitations and Competent Court in Lawsuits Regarding the Rejection of Citizenship by Marriage<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The rejection of a citizenship application is an administrative act. In an action for annulment, the general statute of limitations for filing a lawsuit is 60 days starting from the day following the written notification, unless a special period has been prescribed. The calculation of this period must be evaluated separately based on the form of service, whether an administrative application was made, and the legal remedy information specified in the specific act. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.mevzuat.gov.tr\/MevzuatMetin\/1.5.2577.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Abditory Procedure Law No. 2577<\/a>is the primary source of time limits and trial procedure.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The competent judicial branch for lawsuits filed against citizenship acts established by the Ministry of Interior is the administrative judiciary. When determining the authorized court, the authority that issued the act, special jurisdiction rules, and the specifics of the case file must be considered together. The fact that the lawsuit in this decision was heard in Ankara does not mean that the same court will be deemed authorized in all citizenship disputes without any examination.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Mahkemenin_Hukmu_ve_Kanun_Yolu\"><\/span>Judgment of the Court and Legal Remedies<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Ankara 12th Administrative Court unanimously ruled on April 5, 2024, to annul the subject administrative act of rejection. In the decision, the request for legal aid was granted; rulings were established regarding 90 TL for postal expenses, 25.60 TL for power of attorney copy fees, and 20,900 TL for attorney's fees for hearings, in accordance with the distribution in the text of the decision. The right to appeal before the Ankara Regional Administrative Court was left open within 30 days from the service of the decision.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Litigation expenses and attorney's fees are determined in accordance with the tariff in effect as of the date of the decision and the procedural status of the case. These amounts should not be construed as sample fees or definitive costs for current lawsuits.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Sik_Sorulan_Sorular\"><\/span>Frequently Asked Questions<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Turk_vatandasiyla_uc_yil_evli_olan_yabanci_kesin_olarak_vatandaslik_kazanir_mi\"><\/span>Does a foreigner married to a Turkish citizen for three years acquire citizenship definitively?<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">No. The three-year marriage is only one of the application requirements. Conditions such as the existence of a family union, the absence of activities incompatible with marriage, and the lack of impediments regarding national security and public order are also examined. Even meeting these conditions does not grant the individual an absolute right of acquisition.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Milli_guvenlik_gerekcesiyle_verilen_her_ret_karari_iptal_edilir_mi\"><\/span>Is every rejection decision rendered on the grounds of national security annulled?<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">No. If the administration possesses current, reliable data linked to the individual that can be reviewed by the court, the rejection procedure may be found lawful. The primary reason for reaching an annulment conclusion in the reviewed decision is that the alleged risk was not supported by concrete documentation and that other findings in the case file were favorable.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Takipsizlik_karari_vatandaslik_reddini_kendiliginden_hukuka_aykiri_yapar_mi\"><\/span>Does a decision of non-prosecution automatically render the rejection of citizenship unlawful?<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">No. While the outcome of a criminal investigation is significant data, it does not automatically determine the administrative assessment in every case. The other concrete data relied upon by the administration, the nature of the incident, and the applicant's individual situation are examined together.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Iptal_karari_dogrudan_vatandaslik_kazandirir_mi\"><\/span>Does the annulment decision directly grant citizenship?<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">No. The administrative court finds the rejection procedure unlawful and sets it aside; it does not directly issue an administrative act granting citizenship. The administration is required to reassess the application in accordance with the reasoning of the court decision.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Es_hakkindaki_olumsuz_kayit_yabanci_esin_basvurusunu_etkiler_mi\"><\/span>Does a negative record concerning the spouse affect the foreign spouse's application?<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Depending on the nature of the specific case, it may affect it. However, the connection between the record, the applicant, and the citizenship assessment must be explained, sufficient concrete grounds must exist, and a personalized assessment must be conducted.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Sonuc\"><\/span>Conclusion<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The decision of the Ankara 12th Administrative Court, Case No. 2023\/1014, Decision No. 2024\/629, demonstrates that the administration has discretionary power regarding Turkish citizenship through marriage, but this power is not exempt from judicial review. In the specific case, while a genuine family union and a favorable commission assessment existed, the rejection procedure was annulled because a social media tip was not verified in terms of criminal law and the security opinion regarding the spouse was not substantiated with concrete evidence.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The significance of the decision lies not in every citizenship rejection producing the same outcome, but in demonstrating that the connection between the basis of the administrative act and the concrete findings in the file must be carefully examined. Each application must be evaluated separately based on its own documents, the grounds for rejection, and within the statutory litigation period.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">For the applicant, it is not only important to prove the duration of the marriage. It is also necessary to preserve the records demonstrating family unity, to obtain the rejection decision and the service document completely, to determine the current status regarding criminal or security records, and to ensure that the lawsuit filing period is not missed. The court's outcome in this file does not constitute a guarantee of a result that can be directly applied to different material events; however, it clearly demonstrates that abstract justifications can be tested through concrete and personalized examination.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Kararin_Anonimlestirilmis_Tam_Metni\"><\/span>Full Anonymized Text of the Decision<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">For the anonymized full text of the decision of Ankara 12th Administrative Court, Case No. 2023\/1014, Decision No. 2024\/629, examined in this article, <a href=\"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/2023_1014_karar.pdf\">download the anonymized court decision as a PDF<\/a> link.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><em>This decision is shared solely for informational purposes and the analysis of judicial practice. Personal data and any information that could directly or indirectly allow identification contained within the decision have been anonymized. In the event that the anonymization and editorial work performed on this page are used or shared on another website, publication, or digital medium, batinyilmaz.av.tr must be cited as the source.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Yazar_Bilgisi\"><\/span>Author Information<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Attorney Bat\u0131n YILMAZ<\/strong><br><strong>Istanbul Bar Association Bar Registry No: 77008<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"TBB_Meslek_Kurallari_ve_Reklam_Yasagina_Uyum_Ibaresi\"><\/span>Compliance Statement with TBB Professional Rules and Advertising Prohibition<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">This content is for informational purposes only. It does not aim to advertise, secure business, acquire clients, solicit, claim professional superiority, or guarantee results for any person or institution.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">While preparing the content <strong>the Professional Rules of the Union of Turkish Bar Associations and the provisions regarding the prohibition of advertising for the legal profession<\/strong> have been observed. The information in this article does not constitute legal counsel or a definitive legal opinion with respect to any specific case.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Iletisim_ve_Hukuki_Bilgilendirme\"><\/span>Communication and Legal Information<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Attorney Bat\u0131n YILMAZ<\/strong><br><strong>Istanbul Bar Association Bar Registry No: 77008<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Yakuplu Mahallesi, H\u00fcrriyet Bulvar\u0131, Skyport Residence Kat:12 No:133, Beylikd\u00fcz\u00fc, \u0130stanbul<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Telephone: 0 (532) 669 34 90<br>Alternative Telephone: 0 (532) 732 34 90<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">This contact section has been prepared solely for the purpose of indicating communication channels regarding legal services and <strong>does not carry the purpose of advertising, solicitation, acquiring clients, or claiming professional superiority<\/strong> .<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Evlenme yoluyla vatanda\u015fl\u0131k reddi, idarenin yaln\u0131zca genel ve soyut bir \u201cmilli g\u00fcvenlik ve kamu d\u00fczeni\u201d de\u011ferlendirmesine dayanmas\u0131 h\u00e2linde hukuka uygun kabul edilmeyebilir. Ankara 12. \u0130dare Mahkemesi; evlilik birli\u011finin ger\u00e7ek oldu\u011fu, vatanda\u015fl\u0131k komisyonunun olumlu kanaat bildirdi\u011fi ve ba\u015fvuru sahibi hakk\u0131nda ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclen olumsuzluklar\u0131n somut belgeyle desteklenmedi\u011fi bir uyu\u015fmazl\u0131kta ret i\u015flemini iptal etmi\u015ftir. Bununla birlikte karar, evlenmenin [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_joinchat":[],"footnotes":""},"categories":[449],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3437","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-ornek-kararlar"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3437","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3437"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3437\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3464,"href":"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3437\/revisions\/3464"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3437"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3437"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3437"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}