{"id":3429,"date":"2026-09-13T23:13:59","date_gmt":"2026-09-13T20:13:59","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/?p=3429"},"modified":"2026-09-17T21:53:08","modified_gmt":"2026-09-17T18:53:08","slug":"mense-ulke-arastirmasi-sinir-disi-iptali","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/mense-ulke-arastirmasi-sinir-disi-iptali\/","title":{"rendered":"Annulment Decision of the Deportation Order Issued Without Country of Origin Research"},"content":{"rendered":"<div id=\"ez-toc-container\" class=\"ez-toc-v2_0_88 counter-hierarchy ez-toc-counter ez-toc-grey ez-toc-container-direction\">\n<div class=\"ez-toc-title-container\">\n<p class=\"ez-toc-title\" style=\"cursor:inherit\">Ba\u015fl\u0131klar<\/p>\n<span class=\"ez-toc-title-toggle\"><a href=\"#\" class=\"ez-toc-pull-right ez-toc-btn ez-toc-btn-xs ez-toc-btn-default ez-toc-toggle\" aria-label=\"Toggle Table of Content\"><span class=\"ez-toc-js-icon-con\"><span class=\"\"><span class=\"eztoc-hide\" style=\"display:none;\">Toggle<\/span><span class=\"ez-toc-icon-toggle-span\"><svg style=\"fill: #999;color:#999\" xmlns=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg\" class=\"list-377408\" width=\"20px\" height=\"20px\" viewbox=\"0 0 24 24\" fill=\"none\"><path d=\"M6 6H4v2h2V6zm14 0H8v2h12V6zM4 11h2v2H4v-2zm16 0H8v2h12v-2zM4 16h2v2H4v-2zm16 0H8v2h12v-2z\" fill=\"currentColor\"><\/path><\/svg><svg style=\"fill: #999;color:#999\" class=\"arrow-unsorted-368013\" xmlns=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg\" width=\"10px\" height=\"10px\" viewbox=\"0 0 24 24\" version=\"1.2\" baseprofile=\"tiny\"><path d=\"M18.2 9.3l-6.2-6.3-6.2 6.3c-.2.2-.3.4-.3.7s.1.5.3.7c.2.2.4.3.7.3h11c.3 0 .5-.1.7-.3.2-.2.3-.5.3-.7s-.1-.5-.3-.7zM5.8 14.7l6.2 6.3 6.2-6.3c.2-.2.3-.5.3-.7s-.1-.5-.3-.7c-.2-.2-.4-.3-.7-.3h-11c-.3 0-.5.1-.7.3-.2.2-.3.5-.3.7s.1.5.3.7z\"\/><\/svg><\/span><\/span><\/span><\/a><\/span><\/div>\n<nav><ul class='ez-toc-list ez-toc-list-level-1' ><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-1\" href=\"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/mense-ulke-arastirmasi-sinir-disi-iptali\/#Kararin_Kunyesi\" >Case Citation<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-2\" href=\"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/mense-ulke-arastirmasi-sinir-disi-iptali\/#Uyusmazlik_Nasil_Ortaya_Cikti\" >How Did the Dispute Arise?<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-3\" href=\"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/mense-ulke-arastirmasi-sinir-disi-iptali\/#Mahkeme_Yasa_Disi_Giris_Iddiasini_Reddetti_mi\" >Did the Court Reject the Allegation of Illegal Entry?<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-4\" href=\"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/mense-ulke-arastirmasi-sinir-disi-iptali\/#Sinir_Disi_Etme_Isleminin_Hukuki_Dayanaklari\" >Legal Bases of the Deportation Procedure<\/a><ul class='ez-toc-list-level-3' ><li class='ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-5\" href=\"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/mense-ulke-arastirmasi-sinir-disi-iptali\/#6458_sayili_Kanun_m541-h_Yasal_giris_ve_cikis_kurallarinin_ihlali\" >Law No. 6458, Article 54\/1-(h): Violation of legal entry and exit rules<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-6\" href=\"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/mense-ulke-arastirmasi-sinir-disi-iptali\/#6458_sayili_Kanun_m4_Geri_gonderme_yasagi\" >Article 4 of Law No. 6458: Prohibition of refoulement<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-7\" href=\"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/mense-ulke-arastirmasi-sinir-disi-iptali\/#6458_sayili_Kanun_m551-a_Sinir_disi_karari_alinamayacak_kisiler\" >Law No. 6458, Article 55\/1-(a): Persons against whom a deportation decision shall not be taken<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-8\" href=\"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/mense-ulke-arastirmasi-sinir-disi-iptali\/#Uygulama_Yonetmeligi_m4_Valiligin_resen_arastirma_yukumlulugu\" >Implementation Regulation, Article 4: The Governorship's ex officio obligation of investigation<\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-9\" href=\"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/mense-ulke-arastirmasi-sinir-disi-iptali\/#Anayasanin_17_Maddesi_Kararda_Nasil_Uygulandi\" >How Was Article 17 of the Constitution Applied in the Decision?<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-10\" href=\"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/mense-ulke-arastirmasi-sinir-disi-iptali\/#Mense_Ulke_Arastirmasi_Nedir\" >What Is Country of Origin Research?<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-11\" href=\"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/mense-ulke-arastirmasi-sinir-disi-iptali\/#Idarenin_Arastirmasi_Neden_Yetersiz_Bulundu\" >Why Was the Administration's Research Found Insufficient?<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-12\" href=\"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/mense-ulke-arastirmasi-sinir-disi-iptali\/#Afganistandaki_Genel_Kosullar_Tek_Basina_Yeterli_midir\" >Are General Conditions in Afghanistan Sufficient on Their Own?<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-13\" href=\"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/mense-ulke-arastirmasi-sinir-disi-iptali\/#Geri_Gonderme_Yasagi_ile_Uluslararasi_Koruma_Ayni_Sey_midir\" >Are the Principle of Non-Refoulement and International Protection the Same Thing?<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-14\" href=\"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/mense-ulke-arastirmasi-sinir-disi-iptali\/#Bu_Karar_Onceki_Guvenli_Ucuncu_Ulke_Kararindan_Nasil_Ayrilir\" >How Does This Decision Differ from the Previous Safe Third Country Decision?<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-15\" href=\"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/mense-ulke-arastirmasi-sinir-disi-iptali\/#Mahkemenin_Hukmu\" >The Ruling of the Court<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-16\" href=\"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/mense-ulke-arastirmasi-sinir-disi-iptali\/#Kararin_Uygulama_Bakimindan_Onemi\" >Significance of the Decision in Terms of Enforcement<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-17\" href=\"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/mense-ulke-arastirmasi-sinir-disi-iptali\/#Bu_Karardan_Hangi_Sonuclar_Cikarilmamalidir\" >What Conclusions Should Not Be Drawn from This Decision?<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-18\" href=\"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/mense-ulke-arastirmasi-sinir-disi-iptali\/#Sinir_Disi_Davasinda_Hangi_Belgeler_Onem_Tasir\" >Which Documents Are Crucial in a Deportation Lawsuit?<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-19\" href=\"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/mense-ulke-arastirmasi-sinir-disi-iptali\/#Davaci_Vekilinin_Hukuki_Degerlendirmesi\" >Legal Assessment by Plaintiff's Counsel<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-20\" href=\"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/mense-ulke-arastirmasi-sinir-disi-iptali\/#Sikca_Sorulan_Sorular\" >Frequently Asked Questions<\/a><ul class='ez-toc-list-level-3' ><li class='ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-21\" href=\"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/mense-ulke-arastirmasi-sinir-disi-iptali\/#Mense_ulke_arastirmasini_kim_yapmalidir\" >Who should conduct the country of origin research?<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-22\" href=\"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/mense-ulke-arastirmasi-sinir-disi-iptali\/#Yasa_disi_giris_yapan_yabanci_geri_gonderme_yasagindan_yararlanabilir_mi\" >Can a foreigner who entered illegally benefit from the principle of non-refoulement?<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-23\" href=\"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/mense-ulke-arastirmasi-sinir-disi-iptali\/#Bir_ulkenin_genel_olarak_guvensiz_olmasi_yeterli_midir\" >Is it sufficient for a country to be generally unsafe?<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-24\" href=\"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/mense-ulke-arastirmasi-sinir-disi-iptali\/#Mense_ulke_raporu_eskiyse_sinir_disi_karari_iptal_edilir_mi\" >Is a deportation decision annulled if the country of origin report is outdated?<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-25\" href=\"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/mense-ulke-arastirmasi-sinir-disi-iptali\/#Sinir_disi_kararinin_iptali_ikamet_izni_saglar_mi\" >Does the annulment of a deportation decision grant a residence permit?<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-26\" href=\"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/mense-ulke-arastirmasi-sinir-disi-iptali\/#Bu_mahkeme_kararina_karsi_istinaf_veya_temyiz_yolu_acik_miydi\" >Was an appeal or cassation remedy available against this court decision?<\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-27\" href=\"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/mense-ulke-arastirmasi-sinir-disi-iptali\/#Sonuc\" >Conclusion<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-28\" href=\"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/mense-ulke-arastirmasi-sinir-disi-iptali\/#Kararin_Anonimlestirilmis_Tam_Metni\" >Full Anonymized Text of the Decision<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-29\" href=\"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/mense-ulke-arastirmasi-sinir-disi-iptali\/#Yazar_Bilgisi\" >Author Information<\/a><ul class='ez-toc-list-level-3' ><li class='ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-30\" href=\"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/mense-ulke-arastirmasi-sinir-disi-iptali\/#TBB_Meslek_Kurallari_ve_Reklam_Yasagina_Uyum_Ibaresi\" >Compliance Statement with TBB Professional Rules and Advertising Prohibition<\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-31\" href=\"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/mense-ulke-arastirmasi-sinir-disi-iptali\/#Iletisim_ve_Hukuki_Bilgilendirme\" >Communication and Legal Information<\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/nav><\/div>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>In its ruling numbered E. 2022\/4831 and K. 2023\/2420, the Istanbul 15th Administrative Court acknowledged that grounds for deportation had arisen regarding a foreigner who violated the provisions on lawful entry into Turkey; however, it annulled the deportation proceeding because the risks that might arise regarding the right to life and the prohibition of ill-treatment in the event of removal to Afghanistan were not clarified through sufficient country-of-origin information.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow\">\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Short answer:<\/strong> The fact that a foreigner entered Turkey through illegal means may constitute a legal basis for issuing a deportation order. However, this circumstance does not eliminate the principle of non-refoulement. Prior to removing the individual, the Administration must evaluate current conditions and personal risks in the destination country through a legally acceptable, up-to-date, and thorough investigation.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Kararin_Kunyesi\"><\/span>Case Citation<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table\"><table><tbody><tr><th>Court<\/th><td>Istanbul 15th Administrative Court<\/td><\/tr><tr><th>Case file number<\/th><td>2022\/4831<\/td><\/tr><tr><th>Decision number<\/th><td>2023\/2420<\/td><\/tr><tr><th>Decision date<\/th><td>26.04.2023<\/td><\/tr><tr><th>The administrative act subject to the lawsuit<\/th><td>Annulment of the deportation order issued pursuant to Article 54\/1-(h) of Law No. 6458<\/td><\/tr><tr><th>Date of the administrative act<\/th><td>15.09.2022<\/td><\/tr><tr><th>Grounds for deportation<\/th><td>Violation or attempted violation of the provisions concerning lawful entry into or lawful exit from Turkey<\/td><\/tr><tr><th>Counsel for the plaintiff<\/th><td>Atty. Bat\u0131n Y\u0131lmaz<\/td><\/tr><tr><th>Defendant administration<\/th><td>Istanbul Governorate<\/td><\/tr><tr><th>Outcome of the Decision<\/th><td>Annulment of the deportation order<\/td><\/tr><tr><th>Legal remedy<\/th><td>Final pursuant to Article 53\/3 of Law No. 6458<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The ruling of the Istanbul 15th Administrative Court, numbered E. 2022\/4831, K. 2023\/2420, which is the subject of this review, was handled by the counsel for the plaintiff <strong>Atty. Bat\u0131n Y\u0131lmaz<\/strong> . The decision is discussed solely for the purpose of examining its legal grounds and practical importance, without sharing information that could reveal the identity of the relevant person.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Uyusmazlik_Nasil_Ortaya_Cikti\"><\/span>How Did the Dispute Arise?<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">An administrative proceeding was initiated against the plaintiff on the grounds that there was no record of lawful entry into Turkey and that the rules of lawful entry and exit were violated. By its decision dated September 15, 2022, the Istanbul Provincial Directorate of Migration Management ordered the deportation of the foreigner pursuant to Article 54\/1-(h) of the Law on Foreigners and International Protection No. 6458.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The plaintiff's party asserted that, due to current political and security conditions in Afghanistan, they could not return to their country, that their life safety would be endangered if removed, and that the deportation proceeding violated the principle of non-refoulement. No statement of defense was submitted to the case file by the defendant administration.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The primary issue to be resolved by the Court does not merely consist of whether a foreigner deemed to have violated the provisions on lawful entry into Turkey can be deported. The core dispute is whether, even if a statutory ground for deportation has arisen, sufficient investigation was conducted regarding the principle of non-refoulement prior to the plaintiff's removal to Afghanistan.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Mahkeme_Yasa_Disi_Giris_Iddiasini_Reddetti_mi\"><\/span>Did the Court Reject the Allegation of Illegal Entry?<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">No. The Court acknowledged that the ground capable of serving as the basis for issuing a deportation order against the plaintiff had materialized. The decision does not contain a conclusion to the effect that \u201ca deportation order cannot be issued against a foreigner who enters Turkey illegally\u201d.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Article 54\/1-(h) of Law No. 6458 regulates the issuance of deportation orders against foreigners who violate or attempt to violate the provisions concerning lawful entry into or lawful exit from Turkey. Nevertheless, the existence of a ground under Article 54 of the same Law does not preclude the application of protections regulated under Articles 4 and 55 of the Law.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table\"><table><thead><tr><th>Review stage<\/th><th>Key question<\/th><th>The court's assessment in this case<\/th><\/tr><\/thead><tbody><tr><td>Grounds for deportation<\/td><td>Has a violation occurred within the scope of Article 54\/1-(h) of Law No. 6458?<\/td><td>Yes; it was accepted that the grounds upon which the deportation order could be based materialized.<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Non-refoulement<\/td><td>Is there a risk to the foreigner's life or regarding the prohibition of ill-treatment in the country to which they will be sent?<\/td><td>It was determined that this matter was not clarified through an adequate and legally acceptable country of origin information (COI) research.<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Conclusion<\/td><td>Is the administrative act lawful in all its elements?<\/td><td>Due to the failure to investigate the risk of refoulement, the act was found to be unlawful with respect to its subject matter.<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Sinir_Disi_Etme_Isleminin_Hukuki_Dayanaklari\"><\/span>Legal Bases of the Deportation Procedure<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Deportation orders must be examined by jointly evaluating Articles 4 and 52 through 60 of Law No. 6458, along with constitutional and international provisions concerning the right to life and the prohibition of ill-treatment. To the current text of the Law <a href=\"https:\/\/www.mevzuat.gov.tr\/MevzuatMetin\/1.5.6458.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\">Legislation Information System<\/a> via; and to institutional explanations regarding the practice <a href=\"https:\/\/www.goc.gov.tr\/sinir-disi-etme\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\">Deportation by the Presidency of Migration Management<\/a> can be accessed via the page.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"6458_sayili_Kanun_m541-h_Yasal_giris_ve_cikis_kurallarinin_ihlali\"><\/span>Law No. 6458, Article 54\/1-(h): Violation of legal entry and exit rules<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Article 54\/1-(h) of the Law lists foreigners who violate or attempt to violate the provisions regarding legal entry into or legal exit from Turkey among the persons for whom a deportation decision shall be issued. The court accepted that this legal ground was established in the specific case, but did not terminate its review here.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"6458_sayili_Kanun_m4_Geri_gonderme_yasagi\"><\/span>Article 4 of Law No. 6458: Prohibition of refoulement<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Pursuant to the principle of non-refoulement, no person shall be sent to a place where they would be subjected to torture, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment, or where their life or freedom would be threatened on account of their race, religion, nationality, membership of a particular social group, or political opinions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">This protection is assessed independently of the foreigner's manner of entry into Turkey. The fact that an individual has violated migration legislation does not render their removal to a country where there is a risk of torture or a threat to the right to life lawful.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"6458_sayili_Kanun_m551-a_Sinir_disi_karari_alinamayacak_kisiler\"><\/span>Law No. 6458, Article 55\/1-(a): Persons against whom a deportation decision shall not be taken<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Pursuant to Article 55\/1-(a) of the Law, even if they fall within the scope of Article 54, no deportation decision shall be taken regarding a foreigner in respect of whom there are serious indications that they would be subjected to the death penalty, torture, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment in the country to which they will be deported. The statements of the Presidency of Migration Management also indicate that this assessment shall be made individually for each foreigner.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Uygulama_Yonetmeligi_m4_Valiligin_resen_arastirma_yukumlulugu\"><\/span>Implementation Regulation, Article 4: The Governorship's ex officio obligation of investigation<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Article 4 of the Regulation on the Implementation of the Law on Foreigners and International Protection provides that, before a foreigner who has no right to stay in Turkey is removed, the governorship shall investigate ex officio the possibility of being subjected to torture, inhuman or degrading treatment in the destination country, or facing a threat to their life and freedom. To the official text of the Regulation <a href=\"https:\/\/www.resmigazete.gov.tr\/eskiler\/2016\/03\/20160317-11.htm\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\">Official Gazette<\/a> can be accessed via.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Anayasanin_17_Maddesi_Kararda_Nasil_Uygulandi\"><\/span>How Was Article 17 of the Constitution Applied in the Decision?<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The Court evaluated the right to life and the right to the protection of the material and spiritual integrity of the individual, guaranteed under Article 17 of the Constitution, together. The third paragraph of the same article prohibits torture, persecution, and punishments or treatments incompatible with human dignity. To the official text of the Constitution <a href=\"https:\/\/www.mevzuat.gov.tr\/MevzuatMetin\/1.5.2709.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\">Legislation Information System<\/a> can be accessed via.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The decision drew attention to the absolute nature of the prohibition of ill-treatment, emphasizing that even in times of war, state of siege, or state of emergency, the material and spiritual integrity of the individual cannot be infringed. The obligation of the State does not merely consist of refraining from ill-treatment by its own officials. The State is also obligated to protect the individual against the real risk of ill-treatment they may encounter in the place to which they are to be sent.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights also prohibits torture and inhuman or degrading treatment. The official Turkish text of the Convention <a href=\"https:\/\/www.echr.coe.int\/documents\/d\/echr\/convention_tur\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\">on the website of the European Court of Human Rights<\/a> published.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Mense_Ulke_Arastirmasi_Nedir\"><\/span>What Is Country of Origin Research?<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Country of origin research is the examination of current security, human rights, and political conditions in the country to which a foreign national is to be sent, in conjunction with the individual risks asserted by the person. The purpose is to determine whether the execution of the deportation measure would pose a real risk regarding the right to life or the prohibition of ill-treatment.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The research does not merely consist of drafting a generic template sentence about the country. The information used must be up-to-date, reliable, and connected to the concrete allegation; and the administration must explain the conclusion it has reached in a reasoned manner. Rather than declaring the entire country safe or unsafe, the specific region to which the foreigner will be sent and their personal characteristics may also be included in the evaluation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table\"><table><thead><tr><th>Research title<\/th><th>Matters that may be examined<\/th><\/tr><\/thead><tbody><tr><td>Up-to-dateness<\/td><td>Political, military, and humanitarian developments close to the date of the decision<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Source reliability<\/td><td>Official institutions, international organizations, and reliable country reports<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Geographical scope<\/td><td>Differences between the country as a whole and the specific region to which the foreigner may be sent<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Personal risk<\/td><td>Political opinion, social group, ethnic or religious affiliation, profession, gender, and past events<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Accessibility<\/td><td>Whether the foreigner can be safely admitted to the destination country<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>Justification<\/td><td>Establishing a clear connection between general country information and the individual's claims<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Idarenin_Arastirmasi_Neden_Yetersiz_Bulundu\"><\/span>Why Was the Administration's Research Found Insufficient?<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">In the deportation proceedings, it was stated that there is no legal impediment under Articles 4 and 55\/1-(a) of Law No. 6458 regarding the claimant's removal to Afghanistan. However, the court found that it was not demonstrated which current country information led to this conclusion, nor how the risk to the right to life asserted by the claimant was evaluated.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">According to the court, taking into account the current stage of the situation in Afghanistan, whether sending the claimant back to their country poses a risk of producing a negative impact on the right to life should have been investigated at a legally acceptable and sufficient level. The deportation decision rendered without clarifying this issue lacked lawfulness.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow\">\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The court accepted that the grounds for deportation had materialized; however, because the necessary risk assessment regarding the country to which the foreigner would be sent was not completed, it found the administrative act unlawful with respect to the \"subject matter\" element.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Afganistandaki_Genel_Kosullar_Tek_Basina_Yeterli_midir\"><\/span>Are General Conditions in Afghanistan Sufficient on Their Own?<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The decision does not establish an absolute rule that every Afghan citizen can under no circumstances be deported. While general country conditions are important, the foreigner's personal claims, background, the region to which they will be sent, and current country information must be evaluated together in the review of the prohibition of refoulement.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">On the other hand, it cannot be said that every abstract risk claim raised by the foreigner automatically renders the deportation order invalid. The applicant must explain and support their claims to the extent possible, and the administration must ex officio investigate these claims with current, reliable, and relevant information. The two obligations are not alternatives to each other.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Geri_Gonderme_Yasagi_ile_Uluslararasi_Koruma_Ayni_Sey_midir\"><\/span>Are the Principle of Non-Refoulement and International Protection the Same Thing?<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">No. The prohibition of refoulement is a fundamental protection ensuring that sending a person to a specific country is prevented with respect to the right to life or the prohibition of ill-treatment. International protection, on the other hand, is a separate legal mechanism encompassing application, evaluation, and status procedures within the scope of Law No. 6458.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The annulment of a deportation decision does not automatically grant the foreigner international protection status or a residence permit. Likewise, the absence of an international protection application does not entirely eliminate the administration's obligation to assess the prohibition of refoulement ex officio. The foreigner's subsequent legal status in Turkey is determined under separate procedures.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">In some cases where departure from Turkey cannot be enforced due to the prohibition of refoulement, a humanitarian residence permit may additionally come into question. However, this permit and the annulment of the deportation decision are distinct legal proceedings. For detailed information, <a href=\"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/insani-ikamet-izni-2026\/\">humanitarian residence permit<\/a> you may review our guide.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Bu_Karar_Onceki_Guvenli_Ucuncu_Ulke_Kararindan_Nasil_Ayrilir\"><\/span>How Does This Decision Differ from the Previous Safe Third Country Decision?<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table\"><table><thead><tr><th>Dispute<\/th><th>Grounds for deportation<\/th><th>Primary ground for revocation<\/th><\/tr><\/thead><tbody><tr><td>E. 2022\/4831, K. 2023\/2420<\/td><td>Violation of legal entry or exit rules to Turkey<\/td><td>Failure to conduct sufficient and up-to-date country of origin research regarding deportation to Afghanistan<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>E. 2024\/2102, K. 2025\/427<\/td><td>Assessment of the threat to public order or public security<\/td><td>Failure to concretely determine the safe third country to which the individual is stated to be deported instead of the country of origin<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Both decisions pertain to the principle of non-refoulement; however, the legal issues they resolve are different. This decision examines the sufficiency of the investigation regarding the known country of origin. The other decision concerns the inability to conduct a judicial review on a country-by-country basis due to the administration's failure to specify which state it designates as a \"safe third country.\" This distinction prevents the two decision texts from repeating the same search intent.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Mahkemenin_Hukmu\"><\/span>The Ruling of the Court<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The Istanbul 15th Administrative Court, unanimously on 26.04.2023:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ol class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Ordered the annulment of the subject deportation proceeding,<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Granting the plaintiff's request for legal aid,<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Since the defendant administration is exempt from judicial fees, ruling that no judicial fee expenses be assessed against the administration,<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Issuing a writ to the relevant tax office for the collection of the 55.50 TL postal expense, covered from official mail funds, from the defendant administration,<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Ordering the collection of 5,500 TL in attorney's fees from the defendant administration to be paid to the plaintiff in accordance with the Minimum Wage Tariff for Attorneys in effect as of the decision date,<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Rendering the decision as final pursuant to Article 53\/3 of Law No. 6458<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">has rendered a decision. The litigation period and procedure against deportation decisions must be separately examined in accordance with the legislation in force at the time of the administrative act and notification.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Kararin_Uygulama_Bakimindan_Onemi\"><\/span>Significance of the Decision in Terms of Enforcement<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>The non-refoulement principle due to deportation shall be examined separately:<\/strong> Even if the grounds set forth in Article 54 of the Law are present, Articles 4 and 55 shall apply additionally.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Country-of-origin information must be researched ex officio:<\/strong> The administration must evaluate the risk to the right to life and ill-treatment in the destination country prior to rendering the decision.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>The research must be up-to-date:<\/strong> Outdated or general information may not be sufficient under rapidly changing political and security conditions.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>General country information must be correlated with individual risk:<\/strong> The risks asserted by the foreigner must be examined in conjunction with concrete country conditions.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>The statement \"there is no objection\" is insufficient on its own:<\/strong> The sources and assessments upon which this conclusion is reached must be subject to judicial review.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>An annulment decision does not automatically grant status:<\/strong> The foreigner's international protection, residence, or other legal right to stay shall be evaluated separately.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Bu_Karardan_Hangi_Sonuclar_Cikarilmamalidir\"><\/span>What Conclusions Should Not Be Drawn from This Decision?<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>It cannot be said that entering Turkey illegally produces no legal consequences.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>A general conclusion cannot be drawn to the effect that no Afghan citizen can be deported under any circumstances.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>A foreigner simply stating \"my country is not safe\" cannot be deemed sufficient in every case for the annulment of the administrative act.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Country of origin information (COI) research does not merely consist of examining the general security situation of the country.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>The annulment of a deportation order does not automatically grant the foreigner a residence permit or international protection status.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>The reviewed court of first instance decision does not demonstrate that all deportation lawsuits will conclude with the same outcome.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Sinir_Disi_Davasinda_Hangi_Belgeler_Onem_Tasir\"><\/span>Which Documents Are Crucial in a Deportation Lawsuit?<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Depending on the specifics of the case; the deportation order and notification document, the administration's country of origin assessment, the foreigner's detailed risk statement, documents demonstrating past events, current and reliable country reports, family and social ties, medical records, and other lawful evidence demonstrating the individualized threat may be examined.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The legal grounds for the deportation order, the country of destination, the principle of non-refoulement, the limitation period for filing a lawsuit, and the execution of the stay of execution are distinct headings. For the general legal framework of deportation decisions, <a href=\"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/sinir-disi-karari\/\">deportation order and annulment lawsuit<\/a> you may review our guide. For the scope of information regarding immigration law, <a href=\"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/hizmet\/yabancilar-hukuku\/\">to our immigration law services page<\/a> you can refer.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Davaci_Vekilinin_Hukuki_Degerlendirmesi\"><\/span>Legal Assessment by Plaintiff's Counsel<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>According to the evaluation of Atty. Bat\u0131n Y\u0131lmaz<\/strong> the distinguishing aspect of the decision is that it reviews the deportation procedure in two separate stages. The court first accepted that the ground for deportation materialized due to the violation of legal entry provisions, and subsequently stated that this acceptance does not eliminate the review of the principle of non-refoulement.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">In deportation lawsuits, merely objecting to the subparagraph of Article 54 upon which the act is based may not be sufficient. The country of destination, the date and sources of the country of origin research, the individual risks of the foreigner, the justification in the administrative assessment, and how Articles 4 and 55 of the Law are applied to the specific case must be examined separately. Since the evidence and target country conditions of each file differ, this decision does not constitute a guarantee of outcome.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Sikca_Sorulan_Sorular\"><\/span>Frequently Asked Questions<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Mense_ulke_arastirmasini_kim_yapmalidir\"><\/span>Who should conduct the country of origin research?<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Pursuant to the Implementing Regulation, risks under the principle of non-refoulement must be investigated ex officio by the governorship prior to deportation or removal from the country. It is also important for the foreigner to assert their personal risks as clearly and with as much documentation as possible.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Yasa_disi_giris_yapan_yabanci_geri_gonderme_yasagindan_yararlanabilir_mi\"><\/span>Can a foreigner who entered illegally benefit from the principle of non-refoulement?<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Yes. While the violation of legal entry provisions may constitute grounds for deportation, no one can be sent to a place where there is a risk of torture or a threat to the right to life. The grounds for deportation and the bar to removal are evaluated separately.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Bir_ulkenin_genel_olarak_guvensiz_olmasi_yeterli_midir\"><\/span>Is it sufficient for a country to be generally unsafe?<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">General country conditions are an important starting point; however, they must be examined together with personal risks, the specific region to which the person will be sent, and up-to-date information. An individualized assessment must be made for each foreigner.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Mense_ulke_raporu_eskiyse_sinir_disi_karari_iptal_edilir_mi\"><\/span>Is a deportation decision annulled if the country of origin report is outdated?<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The use of an outdated report does not automatically result in annulment in every case. However, if conditions in the destination country have changed significantly, obsolete information may not be sufficient to assess the actual risk. The date and reliability of the source, as well as its connection to the individual's claims, are examined collectively.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Sinir_disi_kararinin_iptali_ikamet_izni_saglar_mi\"><\/span>Does the annulment of a deportation decision grant a residence permit?<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">No. The annulment decision invalidates the unlawful deportation procedure; it does not automatically grant the foreigner a residence permit or international protection status. The current legal basis for staying in T\u00fcrkiye must be evaluated separately.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Bu_mahkeme_kararina_karsi_istinaf_veya_temyiz_yolu_acik_miydi\"><\/span>Was an appeal or cassation remedy available against this court decision?<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">No. The decision was rendered as final pursuant to Article 53\/3 of Law No. 6458, which was in force at the date of the decision. The rules regarding lawsuits and legal remedies against deportation decisions must be checked in accordance with the legislation in effect at the time of the administrative act and service of process.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Sonuc\"><\/span>Conclusion<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The decision of the Istanbul 15th Administrative Court, Case No. 2022\/4831, Decision No. 2023\/2420, establishes that even if grounds for deportation arise regarding a foreigner under Article 54\/1-(h) of Law No. 6458, an assessment of the prohibition of refoulement must still be conducted separately. The Administration must clarify whether sending the individual to Afghanistan would have a negative impact on the right to life through an up-to-date, legally acceptable, and sufficient country of origin information (COI) research.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">In the specific case, merely stating that there is no obstacle to deportation without conducting this research was not deemed sufficient. Although the Court acknowledged the existence of grounds for deportation, it annulled the administrative act on the grounds of unlawfulness regarding its subject matter.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Kararin_Anonimlestirilmis_Tam_Metni\"><\/span>Full Anonymized Text of the Decision<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Analyzed in this article <strong>Of the decision of the Istanbul 15th Administrative Court, Case No. 2022\/4831, Decision No. 2023\/2420<\/strong>, you can access the anonymized sample, with personal data and information that could identify the data subject redacted, in PDF format via the link below.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-buttons is-layout-flex wp-block-buttons-is-layout-flex\">\n<div class=\"wp-block-button\"><a class=\"wp-block-button__link wp-element-button\" href=\"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/2023_5745_Karar_01_07_2024.udf_.pdf\">Review the Deportation Annulment Decision Regarding Country of Origin Research as a PDF<\/a><\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-small-font-size wp-block-paragraph\"><em>The decision is shared solely for informational purposes and for the review of judicial practice. Personal data and information that may directly or indirectly allow identification contained in the decision have been anonymized. In the event that the anonymization and editorial work performed on this page is used or shared on another website, publication, or digital medium <strong>batinyilmaz.av.tr<\/strong> must be cited as the source.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Yazar_Bilgisi\"><\/span>Author Information<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Attorney Bat\u0131n YILMAZ<\/strong><br><strong>Istanbul Bar Association Bar Registry No: 77008<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"TBB_Meslek_Kurallari_ve_Reklam_Yasagina_Uyum_Ibaresi\"><\/span>Compliance Statement with TBB Professional Rules and Advertising Prohibition<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">This content is for informational purposes only. It does not aim to advertise, secure business, acquire clients, solicit, claim professional superiority, or guarantee results for any person or institution.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">While preparing the content <strong>the Professional Rules of the Union of Turkish Bar Associations and the provisions regarding the prohibition of advertising for the legal profession<\/strong> have been observed. The information in this article does not constitute legal counsel or a definitive legal opinion with respect to any specific case.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Iletisim_ve_Hukuki_Bilgilendirme\"><\/span>Communication and Legal Information<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Attorney Bat\u0131n YILMAZ<\/strong><br><strong>Istanbul Bar Association Bar Registry No: 77008<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Yakuplu Mahallesi, H\u00fcrriyet Bulvar\u0131, Skyport Residence Kat:12 No:133, Beylikd\u00fcz\u00fc, \u0130stanbul<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Telephone: 0 (532) 669 34 90<br>Alternative Telephone: 0 (532) 732 34 90<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">This contact section has been prepared solely for the purpose of indicating communication channels regarding legal services and <strong>does not carry the purpose of advertising, solicitation, acquiring clients, or claiming professional superiority<\/strong> .<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>\u0130stanbul 15. \u0130dare Mahkemesi, E. 2022\/4831 ve K. 2023\/2420 say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131nda; T\u00fcrkiye\u2019ye yasal giri\u015f h\u00fck\u00fcmlerini ihlal eden yabanc\u0131 hakk\u0131nda s\u0131n\u0131r d\u0131\u015f\u0131 sebebinin olu\u015ftu\u011funu kabul etmi\u015f, ancak Afganistan\u2019a g\u00f6nderilmesi h\u00e2linde ya\u015fam hakk\u0131 ve k\u00f6t\u00fc muamele yasa\u011f\u0131 bak\u0131m\u0131ndan do\u011fabilecek riskler yeterli men\u015fe \u00fclke ara\u015ft\u0131rmas\u0131yla a\u00e7\u0131kl\u0131\u011fa kavu\u015fturulmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 i\u00e7in s\u0131n\u0131r d\u0131\u015f\u0131 i\u015flemini iptal etmi\u015ftir. K\u0131sa cevap: Yabanc\u0131n\u0131n T\u00fcrkiye\u2019ye yasa [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_joinchat":[],"footnotes":""},"categories":[449],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3429","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-ornek-kararlar"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3429","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3429"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3429\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3457,"href":"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3429\/revisions\/3457"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3429"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3429"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3429"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}