{"id":3427,"date":"2026-09-14T00:24:27","date_gmt":"2026-09-13T21:24:27","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/?p=3427"},"modified":"2026-09-17T21:52:40","modified_gmt":"2026-09-17T18:52:40","slug":"tasinmaz-ikamet-izni-iptali-v69-karari","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/tasinmaz-ikamet-izni-iptali-v69-karari\/","title":{"rendered":"Annulment of Real Estate Residence Permit and Annulment of V-69 Entry Ban \u2013 Court Decision"},"content":{"rendered":"<div id=\"ez-toc-container\" class=\"ez-toc-v2_0_88 counter-hierarchy ez-toc-counter ez-toc-grey ez-toc-container-direction\">\n<div class=\"ez-toc-title-container\">\n<p class=\"ez-toc-title\" style=\"cursor:inherit\">Ba\u015fl\u0131klar<\/p>\n<span class=\"ez-toc-title-toggle\"><a href=\"#\" class=\"ez-toc-pull-right ez-toc-btn ez-toc-btn-xs ez-toc-btn-default ez-toc-toggle\" aria-label=\"Toggle Table of Content\"><span class=\"ez-toc-js-icon-con\"><span class=\"\"><span class=\"eztoc-hide\" style=\"display:none;\">Toggle<\/span><span class=\"ez-toc-icon-toggle-span\"><svg style=\"fill: #999;color:#999\" xmlns=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg\" class=\"list-377408\" width=\"20px\" height=\"20px\" viewbox=\"0 0 24 24\" fill=\"none\"><path d=\"M6 6H4v2h2V6zm14 0H8v2h12V6zM4 11h2v2H4v-2zm16 0H8v2h12v-2zM4 16h2v2H4v-2zm16 0H8v2h12v-2z\" fill=\"currentColor\"><\/path><\/svg><svg style=\"fill: #999;color:#999\" class=\"arrow-unsorted-368013\" xmlns=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg\" width=\"10px\" height=\"10px\" viewbox=\"0 0 24 24\" version=\"1.2\" baseprofile=\"tiny\"><path d=\"M18.2 9.3l-6.2-6.3-6.2 6.3c-.2.2-.3.4-.3.7s.1.5.3.7c.2.2.4.3.7.3h11c.3 0 .5-.1.7-.3.2-.2.3-.5.3-.7s-.1-.5-.3-.7zM5.8 14.7l6.2 6.3 6.2-6.3c.2-.2.3-.5.3-.7s-.1-.5-.3-.7c-.2-.2-.4-.3-.7-.3h-11c-.3 0-.5.1-.7.3-.2.2-.3.5-.3.7s.1.5.3.7z\"\/><\/svg><\/span><\/span><\/span><\/a><\/span><\/div>\n<nav><ul class='ez-toc-list ez-toc-list-level-1' ><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-1\" href=\"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/tasinmaz-ikamet-izni-iptali-v69-karari\/#Kararin_Kunyesi\" >Case Citation<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-2\" href=\"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/tasinmaz-ikamet-izni-iptali-v69-karari\/#Uyusmazlik_Nasil_Ortaya_Cikti\" >How Did the Dispute Arise?<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-3\" href=\"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/tasinmaz-ikamet-izni-iptali-v69-karari\/#Metindeki_Tarih_Celiskisi_Nasil_Giderildi\" >How Was the Contradiction of Dates in the Text Resolved?<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-4\" href=\"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/tasinmaz-ikamet-izni-iptali-v69-karari\/#Tasinmaza_Dayali_Kisa_Donem_Ikamet_Izninin_Hukuki_Dayanagi\" >Legal Basis of the Short-Term Residence Permit Based on Real Estate<\/a><ul class='ez-toc-list-level-3' ><li class='ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-5\" href=\"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/tasinmaz-ikamet-izni-iptali-v69-karari\/#6458_sayili_Kanun_m31_Tasinmaz_sahibi_olmak\" >Law No. 6458 Art. 31: Owning Immovable Property<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-6\" href=\"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/tasinmaz-ikamet-izni-iptali-v69-karari\/#6458_sayili_Kanun_m32_Kalis_amaci_ve_adres_bilgisi\" >Law No. 6458 Art. 32: Purpose of stay and address information<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-7\" href=\"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/tasinmaz-ikamet-izni-iptali-v69-karari\/#6458_sayili_Kanun_m33_Amaca_aykiri_kullanim\" >Law No. 6458 Art. 33: Use inconsistent with the purpose<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-8\" href=\"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/tasinmaz-ikamet-izni-iptali-v69-karari\/#Uygulama_Yonetmeligi_m28_ve_m29\" >Implementing Regulation Arts. 28 and 29<\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-9\" href=\"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/tasinmaz-ikamet-izni-iptali-v69-karari\/#Konutun_Kiraya_Verilmesi_Ikamet_Iznini_Etkiler_mi\" >Does Renting Out the Residence Affect the Residence Permit?<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-10\" href=\"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/tasinmaz-ikamet-izni-iptali-v69-karari\/#Idarenin_Kiraya_Verme_Iddiasi_Hangi_Delillere_Dayaniyordu\" >What Evidence Was the Administration's Allegation of Leasing Based Upon?<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-11\" href=\"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/tasinmaz-ikamet-izni-iptali-v69-karari\/#Taahhutname_Neden_Kira_Iliskisinin_Kaniti_Sayilmadi\" >Why Was the Commitment Not Considered Proof of the Rental Relationship?<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-12\" href=\"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/tasinmaz-ikamet-izni-iptali-v69-karari\/#Ikamet_Izni_Iptali_ile_V-69_Tahdit_Kaydi_Arasindaki_Iliski\" >The Relationship Between Residence Permit Cancellation and V-69 Restrictive Code<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-13\" href=\"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/tasinmaz-ikamet-izni-iptali-v69-karari\/#Mahkemenin_Iptal_Gerekcesi_Nedir\" >What is the Court's Ground for Annulment?<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-14\" href=\"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/tasinmaz-ikamet-izni-iptali-v69-karari\/#Onceki_Adres_Denetimi_Kararindan_Farki_Nedir\" >What is the Difference from the Previous Address Audit Decision?<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-15\" href=\"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/tasinmaz-ikamet-izni-iptali-v69-karari\/#Mahkemenin_Hukmu\" >The Ruling of the Court<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-16\" href=\"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/tasinmaz-ikamet-izni-iptali-v69-karari\/#Kararin_Uygulama_Bakimindan_Onemi\" >Significance of the Decision in Terms of Enforcement<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-17\" href=\"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/tasinmaz-ikamet-izni-iptali-v69-karari\/#Bu_Karardan_Hangi_Sonuclar_Cikarilmamalidir\" >What Conclusions Should Not Be Drawn from This Decision?<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-18\" href=\"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/tasinmaz-ikamet-izni-iptali-v69-karari\/#Iptal_Davasinda_Hangi_Belgeler_Onem_Tasir\" >Which Documents Are Important in an Annulment Action?<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-19\" href=\"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/tasinmaz-ikamet-izni-iptali-v69-karari\/#Davaci_Vekilinin_Hukuki_Degerlendirmesi\" >Legal Assessment by Plaintiff's Counsel<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-20\" href=\"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/tasinmaz-ikamet-izni-iptali-v69-karari\/#Sikca_Sorulan_Sorular\" >Frequently Asked Questions<\/a><ul class='ez-toc-list-level-3' ><li class='ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-21\" href=\"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/tasinmaz-ikamet-izni-iptali-v69-karari\/#Tasinmazini_kiraya_veren_yabancinin_ikamet_izni_iptal_edilir_mi\" >Can the residence permit of a foreign national who rents out their immovable property be revoked?<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-22\" href=\"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/tasinmaz-ikamet-izni-iptali-v69-karari\/#Arkadas_icin_verilen_barinma_taahhutnamesi_kira_sozlesmesi_sayilir_mi\" >Is a commitment of accommodation provided for a friend considered a lease agreement?<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-23\" href=\"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/tasinmaz-ikamet-izni-iptali-v69-karari\/#Kira_sozlesmesi_olmadan_kiraya_verme_iddiasi_kanitlanabilir_mi\" >Can the allegation of leasing without a written lease agreement be proven?<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-24\" href=\"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/tasinmaz-ikamet-izni-iptali-v69-karari\/#V-69_tahdit_kodu_nedir\" >What is the V-69 restriction code?<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-25\" href=\"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/tasinmaz-ikamet-izni-iptali-v69-karari\/#Ikamet_izni_iptal_edilince_giris_yasagi_otomatik_olarak_hukuka_uygun_olur_mu\" >Was the right of appeal (istinaf) available against this judgment?<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-26\" href=\"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/tasinmaz-ikamet-izni-iptali-v69-karari\/#Bu_karara_karsi_istinaf_yolu_acik_miydi\" >The second significant aspect of the judgment is that the entry ban imposed due to the cancellation of the residence permit was also reviewed based on the same factual grounds. Since the underlying act could not be proven, both the cancellation of the residence permit and the associated entry ban were found to be unlawful.<\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-27\" href=\"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/tasinmaz-ikamet-izni-iptali-v69-karari\/#Sonuc\" >Conclusion<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-28\" href=\"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/tasinmaz-ikamet-izni-iptali-v69-karari\/#Kararin_Anonimlestirilmis_Tam_Metni\" >Full Anonymized Text of the Decision<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-29\" href=\"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/tasinmaz-ikamet-izni-iptali-v69-karari\/#Yazar_Bilgisi\" >Author Information<\/a><ul class='ez-toc-list-level-3' ><li class='ez-toc-heading-level-3'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-30\" href=\"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/tasinmaz-ikamet-izni-iptali-v69-karari\/#TBB_Meslek_Kurallari_ve_Reklam_Yasagina_Uyum_Ibaresi\" >Compliance Statement with TBB Professional Rules and Advertising Prohibition<\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-31\" href=\"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/tasinmaz-ikamet-izni-iptali-v69-karari\/#Iletisim_ve_Hukuki_Bilgilendirme\" >Communication and Legal Information<\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/nav><\/div>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>In its decision numbered E. 2022\/1053 and K. 2023\/3928, the Istanbul 15th Administrative Court found the cancellation of the short-term residence permit based on real estate and the ensuing entry ban to be unlawful, as the allegation that the foreigner leased their residence to someone else could not be proven with concrete evidence.<\/strong> The Court annulled both administrative acts, stating that no lease agreement, bank transaction, witness testimony, or other concrete document was submitted.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow\">\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Short answer:<\/strong> Allowing someone else to use or rent out the residence under a property-based residence permit may affect the purpose for which the permit was granted. However, the administration must substantiate the occurrence of this act with concrete information and documents. In the reviewed casefile, since the allegation of leasing was not proven, the cancellation of the residence permit and the associated entry ban were annulled.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Kararin_Kunyesi\"><\/span>Case Citation<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table\"><table><tbody><tr><th>Court<\/th><td>Istanbul 15th Administrative Court<\/td><\/tr><tr><th>Case file number<\/th><td>2022\/1053<\/td><\/tr><tr><th>Decision number<\/th><td>2023\/3928<\/td><\/tr><tr><th>Decision date<\/th><td>19.07.2023<\/td><\/tr><tr><th>Subject of the lawsuit<\/th><td>Annulment of the cancellation of the short-term residence permit based on real estate and the entry ban<\/td><\/tr><tr><th>The administration's justification<\/th><td>The allegation that the residence underlying the residence permit was rented out to someone else<\/td><\/tr><tr><th>The travel restriction specified in the casefile<\/th><td>V-69 restriction code<\/td><\/tr><tr><th>Counsel for the plaintiff<\/th><td>Atty. Bat\u0131n Y\u0131lmaz<\/td><\/tr><tr><th>Defendant administration<\/th><td>Istanbul Governorate<\/td><\/tr><tr><th>Outcome of the Decision<\/th><td>Annulment of the residence permit cancellation and entry ban acts<\/td><\/tr><tr><th>Legal remedy<\/th><td>Open to appeal at the Istanbul Regional Administrative Court within 30 days following the notification<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The decision of the Istanbul 15th Administrative Court, case no. E. 2022\/1053, K. 2023\/3928, which is the subject of this review, by the plaintiff's counsel <strong>Atty. Bat\u0131n Y\u0131lmaz<\/strong> . The decision is discussed solely for the purpose of examining its legal grounds and practical importance, without sharing information that could reveal the identity of the relevant person.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Uyusmazlik_Nasil_Ortaya_Cikti\"><\/span>How Did the Dispute Arise?<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The plaintiff entered Turkey legally in 2020 and became the sole owner of an independent residential unit located in Istanbul on 20.08.2021. Based on their real estate ownership, the plaintiff obtained a short-term residence permit; however, administrative action was subsequently taken against the plaintiff on the grounds that they had leased the residence to another person and were not occupying it themselves.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The Istanbul Provincial Directorate of Migration Management revoked the real estate-based residence permit by its transaction dated 22.02.2022, and additionally imposed an entry ban on the plaintiff due to the cancellation of the residence permit. Case file details indicate this record as a V-69 restriction code.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The plaintiff's counsel claimed that the residence had not been rented to anyone else, that the use of the property continued, and that there was no concrete document proving the administration's allegation, thereby requesting the annulment of both the residence permit cancellation and the entry ban. The defendant administration argued that the property was rented to another party and was not used for residential purposes.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Metindeki_Tarih_Celiskisi_Nasil_Giderildi\"><\/span>How Was the Contradiction of Dates in the Text Resolved?<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">In the initial summary text of the decision, the date of the residence permit cancellation action was written as 15.11.2023. However, in the \"Summary of the Case\" section of the court decision, the transaction date is explicitly stated as 22.02.2022, and the case file's principal number also belongs to the year 2022. Therefore, in this review, the date contained within the court decision's own text <strong>22.02.2022<\/strong> has been taken as the basis.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">In case reviews, if there is a discrepancy between the summary text and the main text of the judgment, the citation and transaction dates must be additionally verified through the anonymized copy of the decision prior to publication.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Tasinmaza_Dayali_Kisa_Donem_Ikamet_Izninin_Hukuki_Dayanagi\"><\/span>Legal Basis of the Short-Term Residence Permit Based on Real Estate<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The short-term residence permit that may be granted to foreign real estate owners is regulated under Articles 31, 32, and 33 of the Law on Foreigners and International Protection No. 6458. The current text of the Law can be accessed <a href=\"https:\/\/www.mevzuat.gov.tr\/MevzuatMetin\/1.5.6458.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\">Legislation Information System<\/a> via. The institutional explanations of the Presidency of Migration Management regarding the implementation are also <a href=\"https:\/\/www.goc.gov.tr\/ikamet-izni-cesitleri\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\">Types of Residence Permits<\/a> is located on the page.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"6458_sayili_Kanun_m31_Tasinmaz_sahibi_olmak\"><\/span>Law No. 6458 Art. 31: Owning Immovable Property<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Pursuant to Article 31\/1-(b) of the Law, short-term residence permits may be granted to foreigners who own immovable property in Turkey. This provision does not grant an unconditional and immutable right of residence to every real estate owner. The residential nature of the property, the purpose of the application, and other conditions required in current practice are evaluated together.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">For detailed information regarding the value of the property, the single property requirement, the residential nature, and application documents <a href=\"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/tasinmaz-ikamet-izni\/\">real estate residence permit conditions<\/a> you may review our guide.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"6458_sayili_Kanun_m32_Kalis_amaci_ve_adres_bilgisi\"><\/span>Law No. 6458 Art. 32: Purpose of stay and address information<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">A foreigner applying for a short-term residence permit must submit information and documents supporting their purpose of stay in T\u00fcrkiye and declare the address where they will reside. While title deed records demonstrate ownership in property-based applications, it is also crucial that the residence is used in a manner compatible with the purpose of the application.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"6458_sayili_Kanun_m33_Amaca_aykiri_kullanim\"><\/span>Law No. 6458 Art. 33: Use inconsistent with the purpose<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Article 33 of the Law provides that the determination of the short-term residence permit being used outside the scope of its issuance purpose constitutes grounds for refusal, revocation, or non-extension. The condition of \"determination\" implies that the administration cannot rely solely on suspicion or assumption, but must set forth concrete facts regarding the misuse.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Uygulama_Yonetmeligi_m28_ve_m29\"><\/span>Implementing Regulation Arts. 28 and 29<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Pursuant to Article 28 of the Regulation on the Implementation of the Law on Foreigners and International Protection, property-based residence permits require the property to be a dwelling and to be used for this purpose. Article 29 of the Regulation lists the determination of the permit being used outside its purpose among the grounds for the revocation of a short-term residence permit. To the official text where the Regulation was published, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.resmigazete.gov.tr\/eskiler\/2016\/03\/20160317-11.htm\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\">Official Gazette<\/a> can be accessed via.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Konutun_Kiraya_Verilmesi_Ikamet_Iznini_Etkiler_mi\"><\/span>Does Renting Out the Residence Affect the Residence Permit?<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The legal basis of a property-based residence permit relies on the foreigner using their dwelling located in T\u00fcrkiye for this purpose. Renting out the dwelling entirely to a third party and the foreign owner not residing there may lead to the assessment that the basis of the permit has ceased to exist or that the permit is being used outside its purpose, depending on the specific circumstances of the case.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">However, for such a conclusion to be legally valid, the allegation that \"the dwelling has been rented out\" must be proven. The fact that the title deed holder foreigner temporarily accommodates a friend or relative in their home is not the same legal phenomenon as renting out the property to generate income. The mode of use, actual residency, the relationship between the parties, and material evidence must be evaluated together.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Idarenin_Kiraya_Verme_Iddiasi_Hangi_Delillere_Dayaniyordu\"><\/span>What Evidence Was the Administration's Allegation of Leasing Based Upon?<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The court has determined that the defendant administration failed to present sufficient material basis to support the claim that the property was rented out to someone else. The decision specifically noted the absence of the following evidence:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>A lease agreement executed between the plaintiff and a third party,<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Bank account statements demonstrating that rental payments were made to the plaintiff,<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Witness testimony confirming the tenancy relationship,<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Other concrete information or documents demonstrating that the immovable property is not being used by the plaintiff.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The meaning of the enumeration in the decision is not that all four of these pieces of evidence must necessarily be present in every residence permit revocation file. It is possible to prove the rental relationship or the assignment of use to a third party through different lawful evidence. In the specific case, however, no sufficient evidence has been put forward to substantiate the administration's claim.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Taahhutname_Neden_Kira_Iliskisinin_Kaniti_Sayilmadi\"><\/span>Why Was the Commitment Not Considered Proof of the Rental Relationship?<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The case file contains a commitment dated 14.02.2022 stating that a friend of the plaintiff will cover expenses such as accommodation, food, and beverages during their stay in Turkey. The content of this document has been further examined regarding the administration's claim of leasing.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The court determined that the commitment does not contain any information indicating that the plaintiff rented out their home. A person undertaking to cover a friend's accommodation and basic expenses does not, in itself, constitute proof of a lease agreement or rental income. The legal nature of a document must be evaluated based on its content and the true relationship of the parties, rather than its title.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow\">\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The court stated that there was no concrete information or document indicating that the immovable property was used by someone else, and concluded that the residence permit could not be revoked due to an \"unsubstantiated act\".<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Ikamet_Izni_Iptali_ile_V-69_Tahdit_Kaydi_Arasindaki_Iliski\"><\/span>The Relationship Between Residence Permit Cancellation and V-69 Restrictive Code<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">According to the information in the file, following the revocation of the residence permit, an entry ban with a V-69 restriction code was imposed on the plaintiff. In the court decision, this secondary measure was characterized as an entry ban imposed as a result of the revocation of the residence permit.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The entry ban is an administrative act that produces legal consequences distinct from the revocation of a residence permit. Article 9 of the Law No. 6458 regulates the principles regarding the entry ban to Turkey. The official access page of the Law, published by the Presidency of Migration Management, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.goc.gov.tr\/yabancilar-ve-uluslararasi-koruma-kanunu\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\">Law on Foreigners and International Protection<\/a> can be accessed via the link.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The revocation of a residence permit does not automatically render all entry ban measures unlawful in every case and circumstance. Nevertheless, if the sole factual basis for the entry ban is the revocation of the residence permit\u2014which has been found unlawful\u2014the annulment of the underlying act may also affect the legal status of the consequential act. In the examined decision, the court concluded that neither the revocation of the residence permit nor the entry ban imposed on that basis was lawful.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">For the nature of restriction codes, <a href=\"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/tahdit-kodu-nedir-nasil-kaldirilir\/\">our restriction code guide<\/a>; for the procedures to lift the entry ban, <a href=\"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/giris-yasagi-nasil-kaldirilir\/\">How to Lift the Entry Ban to Turkey?<\/a> you may review our article.<\/p>\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The termination of a previously issued and still valid residence permit is a distinct administrative act from the rejection of a new application and the denial of an extension request. For detailed information regarding the grounds for revocation, service of process, litigation period, stay of execution, and the effects of the revocation decision on the foreigner's legal stay, <a href=\"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/ikamet-izni-iptali\/\">our guide on the revocation of residence permits and annulment lawsuits<\/a> you may review.<\/p>\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Mahkemenin_Iptal_Gerekcesi_Nedir\"><\/span>What is the Court's Ground for Annulment?<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The court determined that the plaintiff is the sole owner of the independent section in question and obtained a residence permit based on this real property. The grounds for the revocation are the allegation that the plaintiff does not use the property personally but has leased it to someone else. However, no lease agreement, payment record, witness statement, or other tangible document demonstrating the occurrence of this act has been submitted to the case file.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The commitment letter explained in the petition does not demonstrate a rental relationship either. Therefore, no link could be established between the material event asserted by the administration and the documents in the case file that would justify the conclusion that the residence permit was used for purposes other than its intended purpose.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Consequently, the court ruled that there was no compliance with the law in revoking the property-based residence permit relying on an unproven act. The entry ban imposed as a consequence of the residence permit revocation was also annulled since it was based on the same unlawful material ground.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Onceki_Adres_Denetimi_Kararindan_Farki_Nedir\"><\/span>What is the Difference from the Previous Address Audit Decision?<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table\"><table><thead><tr><th>Ruling<\/th><th>Administrative allegation<\/th><th>Primary ground for revocation<\/th><\/tr><\/thead><tbody><tr><td>E. 2024\/2663, K. 2024\/7206<\/td><td>That the foreigner does not actually reside at the registered address<\/td><td>Failure to supplement the inspection report with neighborhood and utility subscription investigations<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>E. 2022\/1053, K. 2023\/3928<\/td><td>That the foreigner leased their real property to another person<\/td><td>Lack of concrete evidence proving the rental relationship or allowing others to use the property<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Although both decisions concern residence permits for real estate purposes, they do not resolve the same legal issue. The first decision examined the sufficiency of the address verification; whereas this decision examined whether the allegation of leasing was proven and the legal status of the entry ban based thereon. For the evidentiary and procedural aspects of address investigation <a href=\"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/ikamet-izni-adres-denetimi\/\">residence permit address inspection<\/a> you can review our article.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Mahkemenin_Hukmu\"><\/span>The Ruling of the Court<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Istanbul 15th Administrative Court, unanimously on 19.07.2023:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ol class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Annulment of the act regarding the revocation of the residence permit for real estate purposes,<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Annulment of the country entry ban imposed due to the revocation of the residence permit,<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Payment of a total of 695.60 TL in litigation expenses by the defendant administration to the plaintiff,<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Awarding the attorney's fee of 11,000 TL determined for hearings pursuant to the Minimum Attorney Fee Tariff in effect as of the decision date, to be collected from the defendant administration and given to the plaintiff,<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Refund of the remaining postal fee to the plaintiff after the finalization of the decision,<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Rendering the decision with the right of appeal at the Istanbul Regional Administrative Court within 30 days following the service of the decision<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Kararin_Uygulama_Bakimindan_Onemi\"><\/span>Significance of the Decision in Terms of Enforcement<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>The allegation of leasing must be substantiated:<\/strong> Abstract opinion alone does not demonstrate that the residence permit was used outside its purpose.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>The content of the document must be taken as a basis:<\/strong> A housing commitment letter cannot be construed as a lease agreement unless it contains a tenancy relationship.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>The grounds for an administrative act are subject to judicial review:<\/strong> The administration must be able to submit evidence of the act it claims to have taken before the court.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>The connected transaction must be examined separately:<\/strong> The legal basis for an entry ban dependent on the revocation of a residence permit shall be evaluated separately when the primary act is annulled.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>A title deed alone does not confer an unrestricted right of residence:<\/strong> The property must be used for residence purposes and other statutory conditions must continue to be met.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Each case is adjudicated based on its own evidence:<\/strong> A different decision may be rendered in another case involving a lease agreement, payment records, or consistent on-site findings.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Bu_Karardan_Hangi_Sonuclar_Cikarilmamalidir\"><\/span>What Conclusions Should Not Be Drawn from This Decision?<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>A broad private law conclusion cannot be drawn to the effect that a foreign property owner may under no circumstances lease out their residence.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>It cannot be stated that a residence permit may under no circumstances be revoked even if the property is leased.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Every commitment letter issued for a friend does not conclusively prove that the property is actually used by the owner.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>An entry ban does not automatically become void for everyone whose residence permit is revoked.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>The reviewed first-instance court decision does not indicate that all similar cases will be concluded with the same outcome.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Iptal_Davasinda_Hangi_Belgeler_Onem_Tasir\"><\/span>Which Documents Are Important in an Annulment Action?<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Depending on the nature of the dispute; title deed records, residence cards, the substantiated revocation act, records regarding the entry ban, notification documents, inspection reports, electricity, water, and natural gas subscriptions, consumption records, documents relied upon by the administration as the basis for the rental relationship, bank transactions, and other lawful evidence explaining the actual use of the immovable property may be examined together.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">It is important not only that the document exists, but also that it pertains to the period when the revocation act was instituted and that its connection to the administrative reasoning can be established. Filing a lawsuit does not automatically stay the execution of the administrative act. The current legal status of stay, whether the entry ban has been enforced, and the conditions for a stay of execution must be evaluated separately.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">For the general legal consequences of residence permit revocation and the litigation process <a href=\"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/ikamet-izni-iptali\/\">our residence permit revocation guide<\/a> you may review.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Davaci_Vekilinin_Hukuki_Degerlendirmesi\"><\/span>Legal Assessment by Plaintiff's Counsel<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>According to the evaluation of Atty. Bat\u0131n Y\u0131lmaz<\/strong> the distinctive aspect of the decision is that it jointly reviews two separate administrative acts based on the same factual ground. The court first examined whether the allegation that the immovable property was rented out was proven; after determining that this act was not substantiated, it found both the revocation of the residence permit and the entry ban imposed due to this revocation to be unlawful.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">In such case files, merely submitting a title deed record may not constitute a sufficient litigation strategy. The document or determination upon which the administration bases its allegation of rental, how the foreign national actually used the residence, the legal nature of the relationship with the third party, and whether there is an independent justification for the restriction record must be investigated separately. Since the transaction and evidentiary structure of each dispute differ, the decision cannot be interpreted as a guarantee of outcome.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Sikca_Sorulan_Sorular\"><\/span>Frequently Asked Questions<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Tasinmazini_kiraya_veren_yabancinin_ikamet_izni_iptal_edilir_mi\"><\/span>Can the residence permit of a foreign national who rents out their immovable property be revoked?<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">In residence permits based on immovable property, the residence must be used by the foreign property owner for accommodation purposes. Renting out the residence in its entirety and the foreign national not residing there may affect the permit conditions. However, this situation must be demonstrated with concrete information and documents.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Arkadas_icin_verilen_barinma_taahhutnamesi_kira_sozlesmesi_sayilir_mi\"><\/span>Is a commitment of accommodation provided for a friend considered a lease agreement?<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">No. If the content of the document lacks a rental fee, the intention to lease, or other elements indicating that the residence has been rented out, a commitment to cover accommodation and expenses cannot be considered a lease agreement on its own. In the reviewed decision, it was likewise accepted that the commitment does not demonstrate a rental relationship.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Kira_sozlesmesi_olmadan_kiraya_verme_iddiasi_kanitlanabilir_mi\"><\/span>Can the allegation of leasing without a written lease agreement be proven?<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Depending on the specifics of the case, bank transfers, party statements, inspection reports, and other lawfully obtained evidence may demonstrate the existence of a tenancy or occupancy relationship. The absence of a written lease agreement does not, in and of itself, mean that no tenancy exists; however, the administration must substantiate its claims with sufficient evidence.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"V-69_tahdit_kodu_nedir\"><\/span>What is the V-69 restriction code?<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Does an entry ban automatically become lawful when a residence permit is cancelled?<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Ikamet_izni_iptal_edilince_giris_yasagi_otomatik_olarak_hukuka_uygun_olur_mu\"><\/span>Was the right of appeal (istinaf) available against this judgment?<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Istanbul 15th Administrative Court, Case No. 2022\/1053, Decision No. 2023\/3928, establishes that a real estate-based short-term residence permit cannot be revoked based on unproven allegations that the property was rented out to someone else. The court concluded that the alleged act was not substantiated as there was no concrete information or document demonstrating a tenancy relationship or that the property was not being used by the plaintiff.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Bu_karara_karsi_istinaf_yolu_acik_miydi\"><\/span>The second significant aspect of the judgment is that the entry ban imposed due to the cancellation of the residence permit was also reviewed based on the same factual grounds. Since the underlying act could not be proven, both the cancellation of the residence permit and the associated entry ban were found to be unlawful.<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Regarding the judgment of the Istanbul 15th Administrative Court, Case No. 2022\/1053, Decision No. 2023\/3928<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Sonuc\"><\/span>Conclusion<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Review the Annulment Judgment Concerning Real Estate Residence Permit and Entry Ban as a PDF<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The second important aspect of the decision is that the entry ban imposed due to the revocation of the residence permit was also examined based on the same material grounds. Since the underlying act could not be proven, both the revocation of the residence permit and the associated entry ban were found to be unlawful.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Kararin_Anonimlestirilmis_Tam_Metni\"><\/span>Full Anonymized Text of the Decision<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Analyzed in this article <strong>\u0130stanbul 15. \u0130dare Mahkemesinin E. 2022\/1053, K. 2023\/3928 say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131n\u0131n<\/strong>, you can access the anonymized sample, with personal data and information that could identify the data subject redacted, in PDF format via the link below.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-buttons is-layout-flex wp-block-buttons-is-layout-flex\">\n<div class=\"wp-block-button\"><a class=\"wp-block-button__link wp-element-button\" href=\"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/09\/2022-1053-anonimlestirilmis-mahkeme-karari.pdf\">Review the Decision on the Annulment of the Real Estate Residence Permit and Entry Ban as a PDF<\/a><\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-small-font-size wp-block-paragraph\"><em>The decision is shared solely for informational purposes and for the review of judicial practice. Personal data and information that may directly or indirectly allow identification contained in the decision have been anonymized. In the event that the anonymization and editorial work performed on this page is used or shared on another website, publication, or digital medium <strong>batinyilmaz.av.tr<\/strong> must be cited as the source.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Yazar_Bilgisi\"><\/span>Author Information<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Attorney Bat\u0131n YILMAZ<\/strong><br><strong>Istanbul Bar Association Bar Registry No: 77008<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"TBB_Meslek_Kurallari_ve_Reklam_Yasagina_Uyum_Ibaresi\"><\/span>Compliance Statement with TBB Professional Rules and Advertising Prohibition<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">This content is for informational purposes only. It does not aim to advertise, secure business, acquire clients, solicit, claim professional superiority, or guarantee results for any person or institution.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">While preparing the content <strong>the Professional Rules of the Union of Turkish Bar Associations and the provisions regarding the prohibition of advertising for the legal profession<\/strong> have been observed. The information in this article does not constitute legal counsel or a definitive legal opinion with respect to any specific case.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Iletisim_ve_Hukuki_Bilgilendirme\"><\/span>Communication and Legal Information<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Attorney Bat\u0131n YILMAZ<\/strong><br><strong>Istanbul Bar Association Bar Registry No: 77008<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Yakuplu Mahallesi, H\u00fcrriyet Bulvar\u0131, Skyport Residence Kat:12 No:133, Beylikd\u00fcz\u00fc, \u0130stanbul<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Telephone: 0 (532) 669 34 90<br>Alternative Telephone: 0 (532) 732 34 90<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">This contact section has been prepared solely for the purpose of indicating communication channels regarding legal services and <strong>does not carry the purpose of advertising, solicitation, acquiring clients, or claiming professional superiority<\/strong> .<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>\u0130stanbul 15. \u0130dare Mahkemesi, E. 2022\/1053 ve K. 2023\/3928 say\u0131l\u0131 karar\u0131nda; yabanc\u0131n\u0131n konutunu ba\u015fkas\u0131na kiraya verdi\u011fi iddias\u0131 somut delille kan\u0131tlanamad\u0131\u011f\u0131 i\u00e7in ta\u015f\u0131nmaz ama\u00e7l\u0131 k\u0131sa d\u00f6nem ikamet izninin iptalini ve bu i\u015fleme ba\u011fl\u0131 \u00fclkeye giri\u015f yasa\u011f\u0131n\u0131 hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 bulmu\u015ftur. Mahkeme, kira s\u00f6zle\u015fmesi, banka hareketi, tan\u0131k beyan\u0131 veya ba\u015fka bir somut belge sunulmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirterek her iki i\u015flemi [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_joinchat":[],"footnotes":""},"categories":[449],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3427","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-ornek-kararlar"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3427","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3427"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3427\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3520,"href":"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3427\/revisions\/3520"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3427"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3427"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3427"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}