{"id":2544,"date":"2025-12-23T12:22:52","date_gmt":"2025-12-23T09:22:52","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/?p=2544"},"modified":"2026-09-17T21:56:18","modified_gmt":"2026-09-17T18:56:18","slug":"neticesi-sebebiyle-agirlasmis-yaralama-tck-87-nedir","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/neticesi-sebebiyle-agirlasmis-yaralama-tck-87-nedir\/","title":{"rendered":"What is Intentional Injury Resulting in Qualified Injury (TCK 87)?"},"content":{"rendered":"<div id=\"ez-toc-container\" class=\"ez-toc-v2_0_88 counter-hierarchy ez-toc-counter ez-toc-grey ez-toc-container-direction\">\n<div class=\"ez-toc-title-container\">\n<p class=\"ez-toc-title\" style=\"cursor:inherit\">Ba\u015fl\u0131klar<\/p>\n<span class=\"ez-toc-title-toggle\"><a href=\"#\" class=\"ez-toc-pull-right ez-toc-btn ez-toc-btn-xs ez-toc-btn-default ez-toc-toggle\" aria-label=\"Toggle Table of Content\"><span class=\"ez-toc-js-icon-con\"><span class=\"\"><span class=\"eztoc-hide\" style=\"display:none;\">Toggle<\/span><span class=\"ez-toc-icon-toggle-span\"><svg style=\"fill: #999;color:#999\" xmlns=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg\" class=\"list-377408\" width=\"20px\" height=\"20px\" viewbox=\"0 0 24 24\" fill=\"none\"><path d=\"M6 6H4v2h2V6zm14 0H8v2h12V6zM4 11h2v2H4v-2zm16 0H8v2h12v-2zM4 16h2v2H4v-2zm16 0H8v2h12v-2z\" fill=\"currentColor\"><\/path><\/svg><svg style=\"fill: #999;color:#999\" class=\"arrow-unsorted-368013\" xmlns=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg\" width=\"10px\" height=\"10px\" viewbox=\"0 0 24 24\" version=\"1.2\" baseprofile=\"tiny\"><path d=\"M18.2 9.3l-6.2-6.3-6.2 6.3c-.2.2-.3.4-.3.7s.1.5.3.7c.2.2.4.3.7.3h11c.3 0 .5-.1.7-.3.2-.2.3-.5.3-.7s-.1-.5-.3-.7zM5.8 14.7l6.2 6.3 6.2-6.3c.2-.2.3-.5.3-.7s-.1-.5-.3-.7c-.2-.2-.4-.3-.7-.3h-11c-.3 0-.5.1-.7.3-.2.2-.3.5-.3.7s.1.5.3.7z\"\/><\/svg><\/span><\/span><\/span><\/a><\/span><\/div>\n<nav><ul class='ez-toc-list ez-toc-list-level-1' ><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-1\" href=\"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/neticesi-sebebiyle-agirlasmis-yaralama-tck-87-nedir\/#Neticesi_Sebebiyle_Agirlasmis_Yaralama_Sucunun_Sartlari\" >Conditions of the Offense of Intentional Injury Resulting in Qualified Injury<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-2\" href=\"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/neticesi-sebebiyle-agirlasmis-yaralama-tck-87-nedir\/#Neticesi_Sebebiyle_Agirlasmis_Yaralama_Halleri_TCK_871\" >Cases of Intentional Injury Resulting in Qualified Injury (TCK 87\/1)<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-3\" href=\"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/neticesi-sebebiyle-agirlasmis-yaralama-tck-87-nedir\/#Neticesi_Sebebiyle_Agirlasmis_Yaralama_Halleri_TCK_872\" >Cases of Intentional Injury Resulting in Qualified Injury (TCK 87\/2)<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-4\" href=\"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/neticesi-sebebiyle-agirlasmis-yaralama-tck-87-nedir\/#Neticesi_Sebebiyle_Agirlasmis_Yaralama_Kemik_Kirigi_veya_Cikigi_TCK_873\" >Intentional Injury Resulting in Qualified Injury: Bone Fracture or Dislocation (TCK 87\/3)<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-5\" href=\"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/neticesi-sebebiyle-agirlasmis-yaralama-tck-87-nedir\/#Neticesi_Sebebiyle_Agirlasmis_Yaralama_Sonucu_Olum_TCK_874\" >Death Resulting from Intentional Injury Resulting in Qualified Injury (TCK 87\/4)<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-6\" href=\"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/neticesi-sebebiyle-agirlasmis-yaralama-tck-87-nedir\/#Neticesi_Sebebiyle_Agirlasmis_Yaralama_Nasil_Ispatlanir\" >How is Intentional Injury Resulting in Qualified Injury Proven?<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-2'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-7\" href=\"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/neticesi-sebebiyle-agirlasmis-yaralama-tck-87-nedir\/#Sikca_Sorulan_Sorular_SSS\" >Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)<\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/nav><\/div>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Intentional injury resulting in qualified injury<\/strong>, as a result of the act of intentional injury, in the victim&nbsp;<strong>of the severe consequences explicitly enumerated in the law,<\/strong>&nbsp;upon the occurrence of which, the circumstances leading to the imposition&nbsp;<strong>heavier penalties<\/strong>&nbsp;against the perpetrator.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The critical distinction here is:&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Fail\u00a0<strong>intentionally commits<\/strong>\u00a0the assault.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>However, the liability of the perpetrator regarding the resulting severe consequence (e.g., permanent scar on the face, loss of organ function, death, etc.) is assessed based on the specific circumstances of the case.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>In the jurisprudence of the Yarg\u0131tay, it is emphasized that at least\u00a0<strong>negligence<\/strong>\u00a0is required regarding the severe consequence (the above-mentioned CGK decision).<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Neticesi_Sebebiyle_Agirlasmis_Yaralama_Sucunun_Sartlari\"><\/span><strong>Conditions of the Offense of Intentional Injury Resulting in Qualified Injury<\/strong><span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Base Act for Injury Qualified by Result: Intentional Injury<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">For the provisions on injury qualified by result to be applicable, first&nbsp;<strong>the act of intentional injury<\/strong>&nbsp;must be present. In practice, this is mostly encountered as:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>battery,<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>kicking, punching,<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>injury with a cutting\/piercing tool,<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>injury with a weapon,<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>joint\/planned assault<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">and similar acts.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Occurrence of the Aggravated Consequence for Injury Aggravated by its Result<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">TCK m.87&nbsp;<strong>in a list<\/strong>&nbsp;has enumerated. Unless one of these consequences occurs, \"m.87\" shall not apply.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Causation Link with Injury Aggravated by its Result<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Between the act of injury and the aggravated result, there&nbsp;<strong>must be a causal nexus<\/strong>&nbsp;. For example:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Is the scar on the face truly permanent due to the injury?<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Did the loss of organ function develop following the assault, or was it a pre-existing condition?<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Did death occur as a complication of the injury?<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The answers to these questions are generally determined by&nbsp;<strong>forensic medicine reports<\/strong>&nbsp;.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Neticesi_Sebebiyle_Agirlasmis_Yaralama_Halleri_TCK_871\"><\/span><strong>Cases of Intentional Injury Resulting in Qualified Injury (TCK 87\/1)<\/strong><span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Offense Aggravated by its Result: Permanent Impairment of Organ or Sensory Function<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The scope of TCK Article 87\/1-a may apply in cases such as a permanent decrease in visual acuity or permanent hearing loss.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Offense Aggravated by its Result: Permanent Speech Difficulty<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Scope of TCK Article 87\/1-b; may be associated with conditions such as post-traumatic speech disorder, permanent slurred speech, etc. (permanence is strictly required).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Injury Aggravated by its Result: Permanent Mark on the Face<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">TCK Article 87\/1-c is frequently debated in practice. \"Permanent mark\" is a criterion possessing the nature of an aesthetic\/permanent scar and is evaluated in forensic reports.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Injury Aggravated by its Result: Endangering Life<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">TCK Article 87\/1-d covers injuries that medically pose a life-threatening danger. Hospital records, intensive care, blood loss, and internal organ injuries serve as decisive data.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Injury Aggravated by its Result: Premature Birth in a Pregnant Woman<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">TCK Article 87\/1-e applies if the victim is pregnant and the act causes premature birth.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Penalty effect:<\/strong>&nbsp;In this group, the penalty determined pursuant to TCK Article 86&nbsp;<strong>is increased by 1 fold<\/strong>; furthermore, the law&nbsp;<strong>lower limits<\/strong>&nbsp;provides for (in the official text, lower limits of 4 years \/ 6 years).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Neticesi_Sebebiyle_Agirlasmis_Yaralama_Halleri_TCK_872\"><\/span><strong>Cases of Intentional Injury Resulting in Qualified Injury (TCK 87\/2)<\/strong><span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Injury Aggravated by its Result: Incurable Disease or Persistent Vegetative State<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Article 87\/2-a of the TCK entails one of the most severe consequences. Conditions such as permanent paralysis or a vegetative state are evaluated within this scope.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Injury Aggravated by its Result: Loss of Organ or Sensory Function<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Article 87\/2-b of the TCK is more severe than \"permanent weakening\"; the&nbsp;<strong>loss<\/strong>&nbsp;of function is required.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Injury Aggravated by its Result: Loss of Speech or Reproductive Capacity<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Article 87\/2-c of the TCK may encompass severe consequences such as permanent aphasia and permanent sterility.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Injury Aggravated by its Result: Permanent Alteration of the Face<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Article 87\/2-d of the TCK is considered more severe than a \"permanent scar on the face\"; it involves consequences that permanently alter the general appearance of the face.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Injury Aggravated by its Result: Miscarriage in a Pregnant Woman<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">TCK 87\/2-e applies if the victim is pregnant and the act results in a miscarriage.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Penalty effect:<\/strong>&nbsp;The penalty in this group&nbsp;<strong>is increased by 2 fold<\/strong>&nbsp;and additionally&nbsp;<strong>lower limits such as 6 years \/ 9 years<\/strong>&nbsp;are stipulated.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Neticesi_Sebebiyle_Agirlasmis_Yaralama_Kemik_Kirigi_veya_Cikigi_TCK_873\"><\/span><strong>Intentional Injury Resulting in Qualified Injury: Bone Fracture or Dislocation (TCK 87\/3)<\/strong><span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Qualified Injury Due to Its Consequences and the Criterion of Impact on Vital Functions<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The increase under TCK 87\/3 is not automatically in the form of \"1 fold\/2 fold\". The law&nbsp;<strong>depending on the impact of the fracture\/dislocation on vital functions<\/strong>&nbsp;of the sentence&nbsp;<strong>up to half<\/strong>&nbsp;states that it will be increased.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Therefore, in practice:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>the location of the fracture (rib, arm, head trauma, etc.),<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>treatment duration,<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>permanent sequelae<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>loss of function<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">such criteria are evaluated through reports.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Neticesi_Sebebiyle_Agirlasmis_Yaralama_Sonucu_Olum_TCK_874\"><\/span><strong>Death Resulting from Intentional Injury Resulting in Qualified Injury (TCK 87\/4)<\/strong><span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>The Distinction Between Injury Resulting in Aggravated Consequences and Homicide<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">the intent of the perpetrator under TCK Article 87\/4&nbsp;<strong>to kill<\/strong>&nbsp;not, but rather&nbsp;<strong>to injure<\/strong>&nbsp;is directed at; however, the act of injury results in death.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Emphasizing this distinction in the Court of Cassation precedent (the 1st Criminal Chamber decision shared above), for Article 87\/4 to apply:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>the act falling within the scope of Article 86\/1 or 86\/3 of the TCK,<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>the occurrence of death as a consequence,<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>the circumstances of the incident being compatible with Article 87\/4,<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">it has been stated that it is required.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Penalty for Death Resulting from Injury Qualified by its Consequences<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">According to the official statutory text (TCK 87\/4):<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>In cases falling under Article 86\/1 of the TCK\u00a0<strong>from 10 to 14 years<\/strong><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>In cases falling under Article 86\/3 of the TCK\u00a0<strong>from 14 to 18 years<\/strong>\u00a0imprisonment<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Neticesi_Sebebiyle_Agirlasmis_Yaralama_Nasil_Ispatlanir\"><\/span><strong>How is Intentional Injury Resulting in Qualified Injury Proven?<\/strong><span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Forensic Medicine Reports in Injury Cases Qualified by their Consequences<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">In the application of TCK 87, generally&nbsp;<strong>the forensic medical report<\/strong>&nbsp;is decisive. The following determinations are significant in such reports:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>whether the injury\u00a0<strong>poses a life-threatening<\/strong>\u00a0danger or not,<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>whether there is a\u00a0<strong>permanent scar<\/strong>\u00a0on the face or not,<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>whether there is a\u00a0<strong>permanent weakening<\/strong>\u00a0of an organ function or not,\u00a0<strong>loss<\/strong>\u00a0whether it is,<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>bone fracture\/dislocation and\u00a0<strong>its impact on vital functions<\/strong>,<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>if death has occurred, the causal link between the death and the injury\u00a0<strong>nexus of causality<\/strong>.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Causation and Culpability Assessment for Injury Aggravated by its Result<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">In practice, the debate revolves around the following axis:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>\"Is this aggravated result the natural\/foreseeable consequence of the act of injury?\"<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>\"Did the perpetrator act with at least negligence regarding the aggravated result?\"<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Sikca_Sorulan_Sorular_SSS\"><\/span><strong>Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)<\/strong><span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<ol class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>What is the difference between intentional injury and injury aggravated by its result?<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Intentional injury (TCK art. 86) is the foundational act.&nbsp;<strong>Injury aggravated by its result (TCK art. 87)<\/strong>&nbsp;however, as a result of this act:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>life-threatening condition,<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>permanent scar on the face,<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>permanent impairment or loss of organ function,<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>bone fracture,<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>such as death\u00a0<strong>severe consequences<\/strong>\u00a0lead to an increase in the sentence.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">   2. <strong>Is intentional injury aggravated by its result subject to a complaint?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Since the severe consequences regulated under TCK Article 87 cause the offense to become more severe, in practice they generally appear as&nbsp;<strong>not subject to a complaint<\/strong>&nbsp;(investigated ex officio) circumstances. However, since the applicable paragraph (especially the nature of the basic injury and the scope of the incident) may vary depending on the specific case, an evaluation must be made based on the case file.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">3. <strong>In which cases does intentional injury aggravated by its result (TCK 87\/1) apply?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Within the scope of TCK 87\/1, as an example:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>loss of an organ or sensory function\u00a0<strong>permanent weakening<\/strong>,<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>permanent difficulty in speaking<\/strong>,<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>permanent scar on the face<\/strong>,<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>endangering life<\/strong>\u00a0injury,<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>committed against a pregnant woman and\u00a0<strong>premature birth<\/strong>\u00a0in cases where it causes, the sentence determined according to TCK 86\u00a0<strong>increased by one half<\/strong>.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">4. <strong>In which circumstances does intentional injury resulting in aggravated consequences (TCK 87\/2) apply?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">TCK 87\/2 covers more severe consequences. Examples:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>incurable disease<\/strong>\u00a0or\u00a0<strong>vegetative state<\/strong>,<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>loss of an organ or sensory function\u00a0<strong>loss<\/strong>,<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>speech<\/strong>\u00a0or\u00a0<strong>procreation<\/strong>\u00a0loss of capacity,<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>permanent facial disfigurement<\/strong>,<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>committed against a pregnant woman and\u00a0<strong>miscarriage<\/strong>\u00a0being caused. In these cases, the penalty\u00a0<strong>is increased twofold<\/strong>.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">5. <strong>How is intentional injury aggravated by its consequence (TCK Art. 87\/3) applied in the presence of a bone fracture?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">According to TCK Art. 87\/3, if a bone fracture or dislocation occurs, the penalty is increased; however, this increase:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>is not a fixed \"1-fold\/2-fold\",<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>of the fracture\/dislocation\u00a0<strong>depending on its effect on vital functions<\/strong>,<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>up to half<\/strong>\u00a0is applied. Therefore, the assessment of the \"effect on life functions\" in the medical forensic report is of critical importance.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">6. <strong>What happens if death occurs as a result of intentional injury aggravated by its consequence (TCK Art. 87\/4)?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">If death results from the act of intentional injury&nbsp;<strong>death occurs<\/strong>, TCK Art. 87\/4 shall apply even if the perpetrator's intent was directed at causing injury rather than death. According to the statutory text:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>For injuries within the scope of TCK Art. 86\/1\u00a0<strong>10 to 14 years<\/strong>,<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>For (qualified) injuries within the scope of TCK Art. 86\/3\u00a0<strong>14 to 18 years<\/strong>\u00a0imprisonment shall apply.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">7. <strong>How is \"life-threatening condition\" determined for intentional injury aggravated by its consequence?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">A \"condition endangering life\" (TCK Art. 87\/1-d) generally entails:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>intensive care admission,<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>internal bleeding,<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>organ injury,<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>critical blood loss,<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>are associated with medical findings such as head trauma. The most decisive evidence is often the\u00a0<strong>forensic medicine report<\/strong>\u00a0and hospital records.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">8. <strong>What does \"permanent scar on the face\" mean within the scope of injury aggravated by its result?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Permanent fixed scar<\/strong>, means the medical determination that a permanent scar remains on the face after the wound has healed. This determination is:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>generally after the healing process is completed,<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>through photographs and examination,<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>determined in the forensic report as \"permanent scar exists\/does not exist\".<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">9. <strong>What is \"permanent alteration of facial appearance\" within the scope of injury aggravated by its result?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cPermanent alteration of facial features\u201d (TCK Art. 87\/2-d) is evaluated as a more severe consequence than a \u201cpermanent scar on the face.\u201d It may arise in cases where the general appearance of the face is permanently altered (e.g., tissue loss, severe deformation). This distinction is mostly&nbsp;<strong>the forensic medical report<\/strong>&nbsp;clarified with<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">10. <strong>What happens if there are multiple severe consequences in injury aggravated by its result?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">In practice, the same act may give rise to multiple consequences, such as life-threatening condition, bone fracture, and loss of function simultaneously. In such cases, the court generally:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>proceeds with the logic of determining the sanction based on the \u201cmost severe consequence.\u201d This approach is also an evaluation method observed in the precedents of the Court of Cassation.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">11. <strong>By which evidence is the offense of injury aggravated by its result proven?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The most common evidence includes:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>forensic reports (forensic medicine\/health reports),<\/strong>,<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>hospital epicrisis reports, tomography\/MRI results,<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>crime scene footage, security camera recordings,<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>witness statements,<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>photographs showing signs of battery and violence,<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>autopsy report in case of death.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">For more information <a href=\"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/iletisim\/\">https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/iletisim\/<\/a> you can contact us through our address.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Atty. Bat\u0131n YILMAZ<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Neticesi sebebiyle a\u011f\u0131rla\u015fm\u0131\u015f yaralama, kasten yaralama fiilinin sonucunda ma\u011fdurda&nbsp;kanunda tek tek say\u0131lan a\u011f\u0131r sonu\u00e7lar\u0131n&nbsp;ortaya \u00e7\u0131kmas\u0131yla, fail hakk\u0131nda&nbsp;daha a\u011f\u0131r ceza&nbsp;uygulanmas\u0131na yol a\u00e7an h\u00e2llerdir. Burada kritik ayr\u0131m \u015fudur:&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Neticesi Sebebiyle A\u011f\u0131rla\u015fm\u0131\u015f Yaralama Su\u00e7unun \u015eartlar\u0131 Neticesi Sebebiyle A\u011f\u0131rla\u015fm\u0131\u015f Yaralama \u0130\u00e7in Temel Fiil: Kasten Yaralama Neticesi sebebiyle a\u011f\u0131rla\u015fm\u0131\u015f yaralama h\u00fck\u00fcmlerinin uygulanabilmesi i\u00e7in \u00f6nce&nbsp;kasten yaralama fiili&nbsp;bulunmal\u0131d\u0131r. Uygulamada bu, \u00e7o\u011funlukla: gibi [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":2545,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_joinchat":[],"footnotes":""},"categories":[61],"tags":[317],"class_list":["post-2544","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-ceza-hukuku","tag-neticesi-sebebiyle-agirlasmis-yaralama"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2544","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2544"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2544\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2546,"href":"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2544\/revisions\/2546"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/2545"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2544"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2544"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2544"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}