{"id":2475,"date":"2025-12-18T11:12:06","date_gmt":"2025-12-18T08:12:06","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/?p=2475"},"modified":"2026-09-17T21:56:25","modified_gmt":"2026-09-17T18:56:25","slug":"intihara-yonlendirme-sucu-ve-cezasi-tck-84","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/intihara-yonlendirme-sucu-ve-cezasi-tck-84\/","title":{"rendered":"The Crime of Incitement to Suicide and Its Penalty (TCK 84)"},"content":{"rendered":"<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>What is Incitement to Suicide (TCK 84)?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Incitement to suicide<\/strong>, is a type of crime that occurs when one person&nbsp;<strong>influences another in a manner that drives them<\/strong>&nbsp;to commit suicide or&nbsp;<strong>facilitates<\/strong>&nbsp;the occurrence of suicide. In the Turkish Penal Code,&nbsp;<strong>TCK 84<\/strong>&nbsp;is governed by.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The primary purpose of this offense is to protect the right to life of individuals. The legislature stipulates that even if a person's suicide is their own \"act\";&nbsp;<strong>intentional and effective interventions by third parties<\/strong>&nbsp;are subject to separate penalties.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">An important distinction: In practice and ECtHR judgments (regarding Turkish cases), parallel to the approach of the Court of Cassation,\u00a0<strong>\"simple provocation\/incitement\"<\/strong>\u00a0is often not deemed sufficient for Article 84 of the TCK. The evaluation is made based on the specific circumstances of the case; the intent of the perpetrator and whether the act\u00a0<strong>seriously facilitates the suicide<\/strong>\u00a0play a critical role.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>What is Incitement to Suicide?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Incitement to suicide<\/strong>, in an individual whose thought or decision to commit suicide is not yet clear, the decision to commit suicide&nbsp;<strong>in a manner that will cause the formation of<\/strong>&nbsp;to make suggestions and direct.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>In \"instigation\", the perpetrator is generally the person who\u00a0<strong>initiates or distinctly gives rise to the victim's idea of suicide<\/strong>\u00a0person.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>The scope of the act may materialize through behaviors such as messaging, conversations, directing, and having a plan made.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">In practice, when evaluating instigation, the following questions generally come to the forefront:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Did the victim already have the decision to commit suicide beforehand?<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Were the perpetrator's words and actions decisive in the formation of the decision?<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Did the perpetrator have the requisite intent (intentional guidance)?<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>What is Incitement to Suicide of Another?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Incitement to suicide<\/strong>, encouraging a person to commit suicide&nbsp;<strong>encouraging\/inciting<\/strong>&nbsp;can be evaluated as increasing through behaviors; attempting to portray suicide as a \"solution\".<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Encouragement may appear more \"general\" in certain incidents compared to instigation; however, the key point regarding criminal liability remains as follows:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Is the speech or behavior\u00a0<strong>effective<\/strong>\u00a0in the process leading to suicidal behavior in the specific incident?<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Did the perpetrator\u00a0<strong>intentionally<\/strong>\u00a0do this?<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">According to the approach adopted in ECtHR jurisprudence, behaviors qualifying as \"simple provocation,\" such as harsh words uttered merely during an argument, may not always meet the standard of TCK Article 84;\u00a0<strong>intent with the purpose of significantly facilitating the suicidal act<\/strong>\u00a0of function is required.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>What is Reinforcing the Decision to Commit Suicide?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Article 84 of the TCK also includes \"<strong>reinforcing another person's decision to commit suicide<\/strong>\" as an alternative act. This occurs when the victim has already decided to commit suicide, and the perpetrator reinforces this decision through pressure or persuasion processes such as:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>\"Do it, it would be for the best\"<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>\"You have no other choice anyway\"<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>\"If you don't do it...\"\u00a0<strong>stronger, more definitive<\/strong>\u00a0making it so.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">In this case, it is not a matter of instigating (azmettirme) the formation of a decision; rather, it is a matter of&nbsp;<strong>reinforcing<\/strong>&nbsp;the existing decision.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>What is Aiding Another's Suicide?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">One of the most critical areas within the scope of TCK Article 84 is \"<strong>aiding suicide<\/strong>\". Aiding can be any behavior that&nbsp;<strong>materially facilitates<\/strong>&nbsp;the occurrence of the suicide.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Sample categories (may vary depending on the specific case):<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Providing the instrument to be used (medication, weapon, etc.)<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Preparing the location\/environment<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Explaining the method of suicide and directing<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Facilitating the execution by assisting during the act<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">As emphasized in the ECtHR jurisprudence, in the evaluation of \"aid\" and \"incitement\", the perpetrator's\u00a0<strong>financial facilitation<\/strong>\u00a0and\u00a0<strong>intent<\/strong>\u00a0its elements are important.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Penalty for the Crime of Incitement to Suicide (TCK Article 84 Penalty)<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">TCK 84 determines the sentencing range based on the consequences of the act and the manner of its commission:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>TCK 84\/1<\/strong>: Instigation, encouragement, reinforcing the decision, or assistance<br>\u2192\u00a0<strong>Imprisonment from 2 to 5 years<\/strong><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>TCK 84\/2<\/strong>: If the suicide takes place<br>\u2192\u00a0<strong>imprisonment from 4 to 10 years<\/strong><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>TCK 84\/3<\/strong>: to encourage others to commit suicide\u00a0<strong>publicly<\/strong>\u00a0incitement<br>\u2192\u00a0<strong>Imprisonment from 3 to 8 years<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Here, \"publicly\" may refer to situations where the act is committed in a manner accessible to an indefinite number of persons (e.g., crowded environments, internet broadcasts, publicly accessible shares). Whether the specific incident meets the \"publicity\" requirement is evaluated separately.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>What is the Crime of Publicly Inciting Suicide (TCK Art. 84\/3)?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Publicly inciting suicide<\/strong>encompasses making statements that encourage suicide directed at society or an indefinite number of persons, rather than a specific individual.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">This heading may particularly arise in mediums such as:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Social media content<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Video broadcasts<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Forum posts<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Guidance in publicly accessible groups<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Additionally, there may be another distinct legal risk in the field of content production\/communication: Regarding publications that constitute \"encouraging suicide\" in terms of press law&nbsp;<strong>Press Law Art. 20<\/strong>&nbsp;sanctions may also come to the agenda (this constitutes a framework separate from TCK 84).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Compelling Suicide Through Coercion or Threat: Liability for Intentional Killing (TCK 84\/4)<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">TCK 84\/4 introduces a very crucial threshold: In certain cases, the act is no longer deemed \"inciting suicide,\" but directly&nbsp;<strong>intentional homicide<\/strong>&nbsp;may be evaluated within the scope of.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The Article specifically enumerates two main situations:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ol start=\"1\" class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Inciting individuals whose cognitive capacity is undeveloped or impaired to commit suicide<\/strong><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Compelling a person to commit suicide by using coercion or threats<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">In this case, the law explicitly states: \u201c<strong>shall be held liable for the offense of intentional homicide<\/strong>\u201d. In other words, criminal liability may escalate to a much more severe level.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Intent (Mens Rea) and Evidence in the Offense of Incitement to Suicide<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">TCK 84 bak\u0131m\u0131ndan uygulamadaki en kritik tart\u0131\u015fma alanlar\u0131 \u015funlard\u0131r:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>1) Proof of Intent<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Failin, ma\u011fdurun intihar\u0131na y\u00f6nelik s\u00fcreci&nbsp;<strong>knowingly and intentionally<\/strong>&nbsp;whether it had an impact can be assessed through message contents, witness testimonies, prior incidents, and expert evaluations.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">As also emphasized in ECHR jurisprudence, mere phenomena such as \u201coffensive language, quarrels, or hurtful expressions\u201d do not automatically lead to the application of Article 84 of the TCK in every case;&nbsp;<strong>intent<\/strong>&nbsp;and&nbsp;<strong>material facilitation<\/strong>&nbsp;criteria such as these are crucial.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>2) Causation (The Link Between the Act and the Result)<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">In the event of suicide, the following questions specifically arise:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>What is the extent of the perpetrator's influence on the formation of the decision to commit suicide?<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Is there a strong causal link between the suicide act and the perpetrator's act?<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Are there the victim's independent free will, other contributing causes, or psychiatric processes?<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">This assessment is always dependent on the specific circumstances of the case.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>What is the crime of instigating or aiding suicide (TCK Art. 84)?<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<ol class=\"wp-block-list\"><\/ol>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">According to TCK Art. 84, the crime of instigating or aiding suicide is committed through the acts of&nbsp;<strong>instigating a person to commit suicide,<\/strong>,&nbsp;<strong>the restoration of the victim's liberty<\/strong>, is a more severe judicial measure that results in&nbsp;<strong>reinforcing their decision to commit suicide,<\/strong>&nbsp;or&nbsp;<strong>assisting their suicide in any way.<\/strong>&nbsp;The law increases the penalty depending on whether the suicide is actually carried out or not.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>What is the prison sentence under TCK Art. 84?<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The penalty ranges under TCK Article 84 are briefly as follows:-&nbsp;<strong>TCK 84\/1:<\/strong>&nbsp;Imprisonment from 2 to 5 years<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>TCK 84\/2 (if suicide occurs):<\/strong>\u00a0imprisonment from 4 to 10 years<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>TCK 84\/3 (public incitement):<\/strong>\u00a0Imprisonment from 3 to 8 years<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The penalty amount is determined based on the specific circumstances of the case (intent, evidentiary status, severity of the act, publicity, etc.).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Is saying \"commit suicide\" a crime?<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Whether a single sentence constitutes a crime on its own&nbsp;<strong>depends on the specific circumstances of the case<\/strong>&nbsp;. What is critical in practice is whether this statement&nbsp;<strong>intentionally<\/strong>&nbsp;in a manner that&nbsp;<strong>seriously affects the victim's suicide process<\/strong>&nbsp;and the suicide&nbsp;<strong>to a significant extent facilitating<\/strong>&nbsp;whether it bears the character of. In ECtHR jurisprudence, with reference to the case law of the Court of Cassation, \u201c<strong>simple provocation\/incitement<\/strong>\u201d approach is observed, indicating that it may not always be sufficient.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>What is the difference between encouraging suicide and instigating suicide?<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">In general terms:-&nbsp;<strong>Instigation:<\/strong>&nbsp;Planting the idea\/decision of suicide in the victim&nbsp;<strong>to constitute<\/strong>&nbsp;directing in such a manner.-&nbsp;<strong>Incentive:<\/strong>&nbsp;An existing trend&nbsp;<strong>reinforcement\/encouragement<\/strong>, attempting to portray suicide as an \u201cexit.\u201d Both may fall within the scope of TCK 84; the distinction arises from when and how the victim's decision&nbsp;<strong>was formed<\/strong>&nbsp;and the degree of the perpetrator's influence.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>What does \u201creinforcing the decision to commit suicide\u201d mean?<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">It refers to the perpetrator making the victim's pre-existing suicide ideation\/decision&nbsp;<strong>more definitive and stronger<\/strong>&nbsp;through their words and actions. For example, effects such as pushing the person to the point of \u201cI must do it\u201d and eliminating the possibility of hesitation may be evaluated in the specific case.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Which behaviors are covered by aiding suicide (TCK 84)?<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The concept of \u201caid\u201d is broad and may encompass behaviors&nbsp;<strong>materially facilitates<\/strong>&nbsp;facilitating suicide. Examples include (depending on the case): - Providing the instrument to be used in the suicide<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Providing guidance on the method\/location\/plan<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Providing an environment or immediate support in a way that facilitates the act<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Here too,&nbsp;<strong>intent<\/strong>&nbsp;and&nbsp;<strong>must be a causal nexus<\/strong>&nbsp;(the effect of the assistance on the suicide) is important.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Is a penalty still imposed if the suicide does not take place?<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Yes. TCK Article 84\/1 does not make the occurrence of suicide a condition. Even if the suicide has not taken place,&nbsp;<strong>acts of instigation\/encouragement\/reinforcement\/assistance<\/strong>&nbsp;if proven, the imposition of a penalty may come into question.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>What is publicly inciting suicide (TCK Art. 84\/3)?<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\"Public incitement\" refers to encouraging suicide directed at an indefinite number of persons (e.g., publicly accessible posts, open communities, public settings) in an&nbsp;<strong>encouraging<\/strong>&nbsp;manner. Here, the target does not have to be a single person; what matters is that the act is&nbsp;<strong>publicly accessible<\/strong>&nbsp;nature and incentive content.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Is it a crime to post content on social media that praises or encourages suicide?<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">An assessment may be made within the scope of Article 84\/3 of the TCK, taking into account the content, language, context, target audience, and the condition of \"openness.\" In particular, content that \"depicts suicide as a solution\" and is capable of encouraging it carries legal risks. The assessment in each case is specific to the circumstances; the limits of freedom of expression and the element of intent are also debated.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Can an access block be imposed on content promoting suicide on the internet?<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Regarding content on the internet that falls within the scope of Article 84 of the TCK,&nbsp;<strong>blocking of access<\/strong>&nbsp;there are regulations indicating that the process may come into question. In secondary legislation concerning internet broadcasts, among the crimes that may be the subject of an access blocking decision,&nbsp;<strong>TCK 84 (Incitement to suicide)<\/strong>&nbsp;is also enumerated.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Applicable Legal Steps (For Relatives of Victims \/ Persons Who May File a Complaint)<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<ol start=\"1\" class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Preserve the evidence:<\/strong>\u00a0Messages, emails, social media screenshots, links, witness contact information.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Prepare a criminal complaint for the Prosecutor's Office:<\/strong>\u00a0The sequence of events must be explained chronologically and with concrete evidence.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Access logs \/ platform data:<\/strong>\u00a0If necessary, it may be requested that the prosecutor's office issue writs to the relevant platforms.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Expert examinations:<\/strong>\u00a0Issues such as the psychiatric process, the vulnerability of the victim, and the impact of the events may require expert evaluation.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Legal qualification debate:<\/strong>\u00a0Will the incident constitute an offense under TCK Article 84, or will it evolve into premeditated murder due to TCK Article 84\/4? This distinction directly affects the strategy.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Conclusion \/ Summary<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>TCK 84 (Incitement to suicide)<\/strong>; driving a person to suicide\u00a0<strong>instigation<\/strong>,\u00a0<strong>incitement<\/strong>,\u00a0<strong>reinforcing the decision<\/strong>\u00a0or\u00a0<strong>aiding suicide<\/strong>\u00a0punishes these acts.-\u00a0<strong>Penal range<\/strong>: &#8211; Basic form:\u00a0<strong>2\u20135 years of imprisonment<\/strong>\u00a0(TCK 84\/1)<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>If suicide occurs:\u00a0<strong>4 to 10 years imprisonment<\/strong>\u00a0(TCK 84\/2)<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Public incitement:\u00a0<strong>3 to 8 years imprisonment<\/strong>\u00a0(TCK 84\/3)<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>Compelling someone to commit suicide by force or threats<\/strong>\u00a0or\u00a0<strong>inducing a person lacking the capacity of perception to commit suicide<\/strong>\u00a0in the event of such acts, the perpetrator\u00a0<strong>for intentional homicide<\/strong>\u00a0may be held liable (TCK 84\/4).- In ECHR jurisprudence, referencing the approach of the Court of Cassation,\u00a0<strong>simple provocation<\/strong>\u00a0is not always deemed sufficient; criteria such as\u00a0<strong>the perpetrator intentionally and significantly facilitating the suicide<\/strong>\u00a0come to the forefront.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">For more information <a href=\"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/iletisim\/\">https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/iletisim\/<\/a> via our contact address and <strong>0532 669 34 90<\/strong> you can reach us at our phone number.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Atty. Bat\u0131n YILMAZ<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>\u0130ntihara Y\u00f6nlendirme (TCK 84) Nedir? \u0130ntihara y\u00f6nlendirme, bir ki\u015finin ba\u015fka bir ki\u015fiyi&nbsp;intihar etmeye s\u00fcr\u00fckleyecek \u015fekilde&nbsp;etkilemesi veya intihar\u0131n ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmesini&nbsp;kolayla\u015ft\u0131rmas\u0131&nbsp;\u015feklinde ortaya \u00e7\u0131kan bir su\u00e7 tipidir. T\u00fcrk Ceza Kanunu\u2019nda&nbsp;TCK 84&nbsp;ile d\u00fczenlenir. Bu su\u00e7un temel amac\u0131, ki\u015filerin ya\u015fam hakk\u0131n\u0131 korumakt\u0131r. Kanun koyucu, ki\u015finin intihar\u0131 \u201ckendi fiili\u201d olsa bile;&nbsp;\u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc ki\u015filerin kas\u0131tl\u0131 ve etkili m\u00fcdahalelerini&nbsp;ayr\u0131ca cezaland\u0131r\u0131r. \u00d6nemli bir ayr\u0131m: Uygulamada ve [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":2478,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_joinchat":[],"footnotes":""},"categories":[61],"tags":[299,298,296],"class_list":["post-2475","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-ceza-hukuku","tag-intihara-yonlendirme-cezasi","tag-intihara-yonlendirme-sucu","tag-tck-84"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2475","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2475"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2475\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2482,"href":"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2475\/revisions\/2482"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/2478"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2475"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2475"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/batinyilmaz.av.tr\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2475"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}